Discover Our Collections


Limit your search

Tag Contributor Date Subject Type Collection Series Specific Item Type Time Period

327 results

  • Disarmament Committee, January 21, 1964. It has a five-point program. The first was a reference to an exchange of correspondence that he had already had with Khrushchev at the end of the year--to the use of force in the solution of territorial disputes. But he
  • : Well, nobody else did either. D: That's right. We had as operating elements the special forces, and the Kennedys were pushing very hard because Kennedy, you know, had been insulted by Khrushchev--frightened, I think, by Khrushchev, too
  • on LBJ Library oral histories: http://discoverlbj.org/exhibits/show/loh/oh Reedy :: XIV G: 4 Another international issue that was perhaps more significant to you was the problem of Berl in and Khrushchev's announcement that he was going to open some
  • buffer between North Viet Nam and the rest of Southeast Asia. President Kennedy talked to Chairman Khrushchev about that in Vienna in June 1961, and Khrushchev seemed to agree that the answer to Laos was for everybody to get out and leave it alone. So we
  • we could take from here on in to influence the period when Khrushchev leaves the scene. h. The Future of Japan. Analysis of trends in Japan and recommendations on U.S. policy. io African Strategy. policy toward Africa. Review of our long-term j
  • fron other sources. It is n P re n ~a Latina story with a Rio dateline, speculating on tho impaot of the Khrushchev-Eisenhower visits on our policy in Latin Amer ica. I would hope that wo would find an opportunity to express ourselves vi g orously
  • , have shot an astronaut through 81 consecutive orbiu and placed one directly above both our national capital arid our heartland. If this is not sufficient to ring alarm bclls, we have Khrushchev's warning that Vostoks can "carry other freight than man
  • to a majority ot the UN or evea to th• principles or- th• Charter. Khrushchev has said this in so man1 words. (We have aot, but oD.l.ybecause w• have had no need to.) Th• di:f:ferenc•s -. CONFID~lAl. ~0IFIM:lffttL - 12 - Th• dittereaeea betw••• th• US ud
  • several conversations with Khrushchev in Moscow. As soon as we know what went on in these conversations we may well need to take a long range look at our mainland Southeast Asia policy. ::±:$>SECRET 08DEWORD • ' I -~··SE6RE'l' - 3­ pape~mphasized
  • men to be facetious . . . Secretary McNamara: Let me first say I don't know what they were referring to when Khrushchev made the statement. I believe it was Khrushchev who made the statement about an orbital bomb. I don't know whether this was what he
  • in the 1950 1 s, that Soviet Communism is the same under Soviet Party Chief Brezhnev as it was under the tyrannical dictatorship of Khrushchev and Stalin. -- There is once again blood on the Iron Curtain and another nation's death piled on the debris
  • the way we carried on, and I'm sure in my own mind that one of the things that unseated Khrushchev was Ike's honesty. There's no way to admit to a spy plane, give them meterological details or something. r don't think the public really wants to know
  • conventional war, or a nuclear war. spokesmen of all three capitals, Khrushchev, Kosygin, Lin Pi Mao, all of them have proclaimed openly: do it." 0, The Giap, IIThis is the way we're going to So this is the real test of whether or not this technique
  • . And they had a proposal up here that I described as a deal to give Khrushchev a credit card to buy wheat and stuff. want it, and we beat 'em two or three times. And I didn't But I found out since, it's one of the few times I ever really got in a kind
  • to that area . This I agreed to do . I was then assigned as Commanding Officer of the Naval Dispensary on Constitution Avenue, Washington, D . C . My visits to Camp David were on frequent weekends and occasionally visiting when dignitaries such as Khrushchev
  • factors it's hard Of course he did have on that very narrow point an enormous break because of the Khrushchev thing that happened the next day that swept this off the front pages. And I nrust say, I don 1 t think the President really distinguished
  • him a free hand to obtain arms from any source. Dur­ ing their visit to Kabul in December 1955, Bulganin and Khrushchev offered a $100 mil­ lion line of credit to Afghanistan and pub­ licly endorsed its Pushtunistan cause. Nego­ tiations were also
  • way-to rid the world ot capitalism is by war and that this will solve the problomo ot all the non-white people. The Chinese are helping people in all the non-white co~ntries ot the world whenever struggle cccurs and KHRUSHCHEV' 1s 11hite and therefore
  • " Khrushchev ' s gri~ly a~o~t mi=c.cle "- - ~!:at he pla::lted i~ wheat i n Kazakhsta:::1 and harvested i~ Canada . 2. The new leaders had th:..s in mi:1d wl::e :::i they planned agr~cultural to 1970, but :iow investmen~s t~ey for 1 966 appaar
  • /6 Meets JFK upon his return from Europe this morning (Khrushchev summit?), speaks to Advertising Council, meets with Sterling Kottrell, head of President’s Task Force on Vietnam, meets with JFK and leadership re: JFK’s trip. 6/7 Commencement
  • between President Kennedy and Soviet Premier Khrushchev. Mr. Beschloss is a frequent contributor to the "News Hour with Jim Lehrer" and has also served as a network analyst, commenting on American-Russian relations, the failed Soviet coup of 1991
  • between President Kennedy and Soviet Premier Khrushchev. Mr. Beschloss is a frequent contributor to the "News Hour with Jim Lehrer" and has also served as a network analyst, commenting on American-Russian relations, the failed Soviet coup of 1991
  • of unfair coverage in Vietnam, or unfair analysis? S: Oh, yes. Bill Moyers did, and Bob McNamara did. But that went with the turf. You know, Truman did, Eisenhower did. We did a debate with Khrushchev--no, not a debate; we did "Face the Nation
  • . In ..the U-2 • Incident and Its ,.!t • CONSIDER first Soviet·: two major Chinese cities, botched handling got 1n the:: relations with Communist . Nannlng and . Canton, ·there __,,tway,Khrushchev wu trying , China Before the Paris peace· have been ·public
  • policies in Asia paralleling our own interests. To be sure, there may be occasions when for. tactical reasons we will momentarily find ourselves on the same side of the table. But a little more than three years ago Khrushchev was threatening Jack Kennedy
  • and more steel for more and more steel plants. As Khrushchev once put it: you can't eat steel. They are struggling to make the beginnings of a modern consum.er economy of the kind enjoyed already in Western Europe and Japan as well as here in the United