Discover Our Collections


  • Tag > new2024-Mar (remove)
  • Subject > Nuclear weapons (remove)

14 results

  • be necessary. 3. We should avoid direct threats that we would cut back (or eliminate) economic aid in the event of a pro­ nuclear decision. However, if India's leaders should ask us what our reaction woµld be, we should consider expressing the view that we
  • ..... ,.. .... ef lta _, ladla Jau --•• la eacb cu• We baYe t. declcle MW c:Wc•. ... •--• It ••:aid N wonla ._ •••• 1. ladla c...W Mly • DD aay ef..., •• mlp& tq .. laa-• IMla elf .. Wlalcll ar• •• ....... ... tnad• a. ps-, ■•ale cvnat
  • ~ rV INFO PARIS VIENNA BRUSSELS LONDON •• L P ■O .AID AG" co"' "'"" FROM U.S. Embassy OTTAWA INT LAIi TA" SUBJECT: Proposed Sale of Canadian Uranium to France T" ARMY 010 INOICATO" a XM ■ Al" CIA NAVY DATE: )0 June 1965 REF r
  • of "going nuclear" expenditures future ·aid levels.· dual emphasis.on and on the need to hold down defense can be expected to encou~age India·'s to hold the line a$ainst nuclear weapons. unless ways can be found of 111eeting India's
  • of the Export Control Act we of course try to give reasonable consideration to our other special responsibilities to promote and expand our export trade, to encourage our private foreign investments, and generally to aid our national efforts to improve the U.S
  • capabilities, operating independently, are expensive, prone to obsolescence, and ·lacking in credibility as a deterrent." While our policy with respect to denying any aid to French nuclear deterrent program is thus firm and unchanged, we are also being careful
  • ,•vE HAD A VERY SUCC!SSFll. MEETING•WITHDALEY AND HIS AIDES. IT WAS SIMILAR, HE SAID, 'TO A NEETIN8 RE HADLAST WEEKWITHILLINOIS GOV. OTTO KIRNER. SEABORGSAID THAT CHICAGO•vILL PLAY AN IMPORTANTROLi II MAINTAININS THE NECESSARYENVIRONIINT FORTHE
  • successors will hardly most of whom now accept military matters belong to his not only the size of the military budget will the "reserved but also the again become sub­ of contention. In a pinch, aid funds de Gaulle to the nuclear
  • •• t•hn!Ml .)> tar r tar ranmsi, £#))(1) PIIIOt ■ ldll ~ QllS no m.dw• data to .,,_ Son aid Cbicaa DOV • pdata but Mrelt than that waured not. be danpl- ot tbia lllgbt <-hcN&bWa aboal.d imtieatien ..-.1¥ to Jl'Nnch tran.d.Nien
  • on nuclear proliferation. By the time of the latest French pur­ chase request in late 1964, the U.S. had come out agalMt proliferation rnd decided a,alnst aiding France further In atomic delivery systems. The French are thqht to be· producing enoueh enriched
  • 'between the cirilian and the m;Htary a,encle• of the U. S. Cion~ npre•ented by the Atomic Ener17 Commi••ion on one aide and the Defeue Department oa t:ha other~ Thi• baa rn;_,nffeated it.elf in maay way■ but la DO way more pl"O• IIOUDCedtbaa la the al"ea
  • ? 1mpllcat.lons. Tqo many are accevtlng the for, and to construct, adntinlster, and.· Mr. ASPINALL. I will be ,Ind to yield words of the President and his aides mnintaln an ext.ension ot tte Blue Ridse to the gentleman. without crl,ic,il scrutiny ~ to the ultl
  • ON NEW APPROACHESTO ABM DE.FENS· ANO ON DEVE OPMENT OF SOPHlSTlC.ATPD PEN ·'TRATI.ON DEVICES FOR OUR OFFENSIVE FORCESo IN ADDITION)VASTSUMS@HAVEBEBNSPENTFOR PENE~RATION AIDS TO­ OURE'ISTING MISSILE FORCE. A LIGHTAB!-1SYSTEM WHICHWOULD GIVE APDITIONAL
  • that our !nt~retation ot t~e Export Control Act _includes ~ •• •iet tl·.at any aid to the build--.ip ot the economic potential ot bloc .. .-ions ~houl.d be con::;;.:..'9\le;o. g,o g. ..-~olation ot the Act. This is a I:list ..~ • .. ..)ressi.)n. ·::~1eAct c