Discover Our Collections


  • Tag > new2024-Mar (remove)
  • Collection > National Security Files (remove)
  • Subject > Nuclear weapons (remove)

12 results

  • enriched two year,. sive force of the fission triger. -tes Ma An Sdoaao, = ,,....., PRESERVATION cu.-Y PRESS RELEASE The UDlted Stat.a nuclear baa detected teat la the atmoapbere tu i8tb ol December uother Chine•• Comm-.mbt at taelr te•t
  • -80WOlEI _.ll)hidl _CHASE _COOPER AYNES n:: M f'_KLE,N I"> _j(CW_ - __a."tDY 5:::ilRs - N a:: ~ -;r~ Following publication of the John Finney article in the Paris edition of the NewYork Time·s on April 18, British press coverage of the subject
  • uranium becomes available, there have been hints in the press that France is having difficultieswith its program. Should this be true, the first generation of both the land-based and subm11rine­ launched missile systems might have to use warheads developed
  • with 40 Joel Le Theule, November 7, 1963, Journal officiel, p. 6729. 41 Journal officiel, p. 6735. 42 July 23, 1964, press conference, Le M:>nde, July 25, 1964. 43 Sondages, 1963, No. 3, p. 104. 44 charles de Chambrun, Journal officiel, p. 6765
  • a feasibility study brought about by the French, British, and U.S. SSTpro­ posals being publicized in the Western press. By 1962 Soviet press articles car­ ried sketches of an SST obviously derived from the Bounder bomber prototype. Al­ though not an economical
  • States to •1t a terrible price to pay for a pack o! Mr. HOS:\!ER. l\ir. Speakrr, today we ·selectively proliferate purely defensive words v.·hich could be quite meaningless re-~~!\·ed a message from the t>-residc:nt nuclear armaments to hard-pressed U.S
  • of mounting pressure in Parliament to go nuclear, is not clear. Lower -Indian officials have been quoted in the press as believing that a nuclear explosive for "peaceful purposes" "'- would not vioiate India's formal commitment to Canada to use plutonium from
  • HOMELASTEVENINGA NUMBER OF FRENCHMEN SPOKETO HIM ABOUTTHE PRESIDENTfSCo.NENTSAT PRESS CONFERENCE AND EXPRESSED CONSID£RAB~E BITTERNESSOVERWORDS HE USEDIN CONDEMNING FRENCHNUCLEAR PROGRAM.THE WORD"INIMICAL" UNFORTUNATELY HASA MUCHSTRONGER CONNOTATION IN FRENCH
  • be prudent to continue the techniee.l i'rork now unde:r-.·:ay revision cf tt.1;:, cu1'".i-entembargo c:.efini­ 2.-:d to press in cooa1tor a realistic tion. With respect to the computer complex that Control D:1.t.e.Co:..1>oration proposed to ID..'Portto East