Discover Our Collections


7 results

Memo, Levinson and Wattenberg to LBJ, 6/7/67, 7.45 PM (Item)
  • this reaction from community in America: League of the the Jewish Monday there was sharp disillusion and dismay at the McClosky statement concerning "neutrality in word, thought, and deed. " The row -back by Secretary Rusk did not fully catch up
Memo, Hallett to Smith, 12/4/63 (Item)
  • of Staff Emergency Action Procedures {SM-600-63) dated 12 June 1963, the JCS, comman­ ders of unified and specified commands, CINCNORAD or higher authority are authorized to declare Defense Readiness Conditions (DEFCONS) 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. A copy of Chapter
Memo, Fleming to LBJ, 6/5/67, 2.10 PM (Item)
  • on a cease-fire resolution, but there is not yet a clear indication of probable action on the Indian request for condem­ nation of Israel for the deaths of the Indian soldiers. She said it was reported that Britain was seeking a Big Four summit meeting
Memo, Rostow to LBJ, 6/13/67, 3.55 PM (Item)
  • or dropped and the "tone of the exchange lowered. repeated that he saw nothing wrong at all in our asking how it could have happened; who did it; and our requesting that the Israeli government do something about it. The implication of purposeful action
Memo, Fleming to LBJ, 6/6/67, 12.10 PM (Item)
  • with U. S. 1 but no confirniation here. Bob 1 statement still stood although Pierpoint said Mr. Rusk s morning Cairo was not pulling back on charge of U.S. air activity. Richard Hottelet reported no signs yet of USSR action to back words of support to UAR.
Memo, Davis to Rostow, 6/9/67, part II (Item)
  • statement and called for action to uphold it. of the attached report Fedorenko (who no doubt knew th\vcontents from General Bull to Thant) repeatecl7l'ressed Thant to make available said he had all information he had on the situation. Thant repeatedly
Memo, Wattenberg to LBJ, 6/5/67, 11.00 PM (Item)
  • and resolute of the Middle East situation. President Truman is regarded as a great hero in the Jewish community because of his firm action in 194 7. You have done no less and ought to get the credit for it. The "neutrality" statement and I am not not sure