Discover Our Collections
Limit your search
Tag- Digital item (30)
- new2024-Dec (30)
- 1966-xx-xx (6)
- 1965-xx-xx (4)
- India (20)
- Shastri, Lal Bahadur, 1904-1966 (3)
- China (1)
- France (1)
- Text (30)
- Folder (30)
30 results
- and !tgure we'd be better off taking that course ri ht of'£ :rathet than trying the back door· fb"G't. AID and State generally fa11or trying the ,a,ivn; 0. (thoug1 ·.uit willing to eon ider t a!ver) thinks, it would be m.or.e stl-aightfor-ward and " rofitable
- ., and was receiving far less per capita aid than most. The President said that he had to prove three things to the Congress; iirst., that others were fully participating in help for India; second, that :ndia was doing everything that she could do for herself
- GSA FORM 7122 i(REV. 5-82) • l _,,,,,,- DECLASSmm E.O. 12356,Sec.3.4 NlJ... . '1't.-/1:/._ By ~.NARA,D:ate ,-~~-"!~ 17 June 1966 RWK: These cables package and Hoopes give you the New Delhi panorama, and the aid paper give you the latest
Folder, "INDIA - Prime Minister Visit 1966 [1 of 3]," Files of Robert W. Komer, NSF, Box 22-2
(Item)
- ..yub's finance minister·· ill be her,e ne:xt wee1'" for informal talks with the orld Bank and AID. Ayub is still pressing for resumption of military aid, and we l.,vill have recomn-, e:ndations ,on that in a :L..N Ne k.:,. But we are ignoring both
- flops), the hastrl vi it should be. an easy one. His, n:aia concern (though, like Ayub, h lrlaf not ask directly) will be when an.d on what terme we 1 ll resume badly needed economic aid. DECLASSIFIED E.O. 13·:>02, Se ...3.4 : NSC Memo, 0/: 5, St
- commitm.eAt of reaource1 ond our dtplomatic 1k1Us but also oa our determination to ocohe1trata lnto e -• co ehen11ve plan the various acUv1t1e• of State, ·USU, AID, Pentagon. Right now for tn1umce ona part of the U. I. G. s urging the Indians to worry more
- on India- .... ao long as he is- ia power lndta will pur•ue vigorowsly the political and He doea.n•t want to put the President economic policies outlined above. on tho spot by asking for aid any mare than .Ayub did, but what are th President's own view1
Folder, "INDIA - Prime Minister Visit 1966 [3 of 3]," Files of Robert W. Komer, NSF, Box 22-2
(Item)
- V.irs. Gan hie ane if t e 22 o wan ed he aide o me tion to get explore The S cretary ma da e. FORM • l S- again behind the PreBident the importance nteersn. 4 of this point "None. He par icularly an energe including In a free ary
Folder, "INDIA - Prime Minister Visit 1966 [2 of 3]," Files of Robert W. Komer, NSF, Box 22-2
(Item)
- with the International Bank for Reconstruction and Developmento From 1958 to 1961 he was again in Washington, that time as Indian Commissioner General for Economic Affairs, a post especially created to deal on a global basis with questions of foreign aid for India. 0 0
- work· .._ out a ·Kashmir settlement the United States will not give aid to , . either country .. This in effect would give Pakistan a veto on U.S. •• ..: .• aid to India. In effect this would permit one party to sabotage the •..•·· Tashkent Agreement
- the aid bill through. ,.~, unduly p-eesim.istic Pr till w• can re-validate here. our Neitheir Kom r nor but we must aak you to. gr.ant tho td nt'if own unpa.,rall~led sense· of the rocky i-o d th &id bill i having and his s t:r-ong desire
- October Dear Dr. 21, 1965 Graham: The wheels of government grind slowly - - obviously. I have had the question of aid for the Ludhiana Christian Medical College of North India in the mill since the day I received your letter. The recommendations
- pnss~-3 -·dia by, inve ting at record leve_0 in other co1..mtricso :p; ::.s cJ.e.• ned t .t rcotoration of o· aid wi r.1:1!:.eit _ ossible to geJc the economy oving d t"!w.t such is a eceos ,,.y essm·ance f :.. _ -~·Ge inves··- .ent • .JJ.:i.•s.G~ndhi
- in the way of interim FIIOllft aid deciaicna •~~cuing We would hope this is not so bwt freeman i!l·actively made for such help and will explore it further authorized after 3. As you know frcxn Deptel Washingtono be revealed Thia to Indians. L
- I POINTED .OUT WOULD ONLY LEAD TO FURTHER TROUBLE IF FULL TEXT LATER BECAME AVAILABLE. JHA : WAS R.ELUCTANT TO CONTEMPLATE RELEASEOF. PRESIDENT'S APRIL , 15 LETTER c'DEPTE.L.2162>' ••BECAUSE OF ITS. REFERENCE TO AID i PROGRA·M. •• • • • l i
- ®d d®@p 001 ©~ at neh ~ intwsio&:ga. USIA NSC ifUhdrnn 0 INR • CIA 3. NSA • • .. .. - ~ 4 • .... In aul>M~nt ~N NIC AID extehl&i probl-.s, ta .. to ah • had earlier po•r it would ~ ..physi©&U.y diffieu1t h@ ~ ~~y expi-.sa
- ." INFORMED SOURCES SAID HE WASSEEKING250 MILLIONTO 300 MILLIONDOLLARS IN U.S. AID OVERTHE 5 YEARS. LT&WE415PED 5/18 -....___/ PA • ME - OF BU AU O ...ALEXANDE ---BRUBECK .. CHASE Not OUNG'AN FDRRESTAL JESSUP __.JOHNSON I • Intel.ligence Secretary T •/e
- !! l' ..lo__,~, tr/I~ lJ H f- /,-f,'ca/ tJ_K. ~~ •INCOMING T~L~G~ t/ep,)rtment . of State COlifIDEN't'JAL 43 ~ction • .NEA 1 Info ! .. ss. 'G SP ... • -SAH. L EUR, p· -~ USIA ·NSC INR CIA ·NSA· IGA AID. STR. -E () . co~ TRSY XMB
- a gr t t • entially th ir ait till y lo Paldatan on their nnedy l •• no intent at lip back into e old a.ya in hich even tr ate aid taa. i ~- is o India va. Pa t heth r ov.r m slve u.bcontinent inves en s orthwhile. The r 1 qu tio 1a ther it would
- by India's need for US aid. She, and especially some of her advisers, are well awe.re o:f of the importance of the US to Indian development, so that no basic modification the Indian non-alignment poli~y is likely. Indeed, non-alignment as a slogan
- - quick:ly as poesible end lilltlmate-ly nation• in tbreworld ,economy. pWtlcipete •• fr" ~ aid~ bow var, con1tltute• an important lev« lo both c ,untri ff,. mtqht 90 to the lule India at 1 1t ovtet Vnf n fot m1Utary equipment, •• have the U' • • •ad
- policy and Pakistan agreement. in concert knows this. with Conmunist China. Harri.ro.an replied We have ne serious Free World countries engaged. we doubt there repeated that want cut off aid any such military to trade with China objection
- the Indians do not count on us following up thia meeting by immediately turning the aid tap full on again. Indeed. I would not envisage aid specifics being discussed much more than they were when Ayub was here. If Indira can convince the President that she ls
- leverage because of our AID program--although if our pressures are too insensitive, the Indians will turn us down at whatever cost to themselves. I ~ However, we can exercise very little leverage in regard to procurement from the USSR. The Communist bloc
- :· ·: ..' /~ ~· 15', 1965 i'..pril REF: .. DATE ' SUSJC::CT: Objectives, policy guid~ca aid raquost~d covcraeo in co~:1nection with the U.So visit of ?rimG 1linister ,...hc.stri. AGENCY USE Jonrr USIS-EhGASSY 720 INFO. ·r;s I/R· I
- ~y for the first time to solicit •military aid. -~WO FOREIGNDISSEM .ee~DtL/NO FOREIGN DISSEM - 2 - The rapid western response to the Indian predicament was appreciated, and in the minds of many Indians the conflict with China raised questions
- · 1tio1 would be considera ly · e s. owever, didn't _·ee - ruah:c:iev .1re arcd to o ,t! is far for ite a w ,ile ;et. sto v--ft n 1. b.ere was an int ,reatin., ide hen .- ;.,.Ras ed ·.,1r e r i vie .. DlcY. aid 1e ad raised this que tion vera.1 ti 1e t
- .crisis. No one could criti.ci~• us for trying to shift an old burden to others, .and we'd then be in a very strong pc.dition to 1nake India and the U'N'get others to match whatever emel:'gency aid we gave. 1f they didn 1t, we wouldn 1t. So I'd stW ur·ge
- is sent. might wish to issue a few days after As you will note, the draft st:atament closely follows the le·tter but reL.es on the info::::-raatim-i cont2.:.ned in the Aide Memoire and thus avvids c~uotir1g G2n-:..::al De Gaulle ts letter to you. Secretary