Skip to main content
-
Tag >
Digital item
(remove)
-
Tag >
new2024-June
(remove)
-
Specific Item Type >
Report
(remove)
Limit your search
Tag
Date
Subject
Type
Collection
Series
Specific Item Type
Time Period
23 results
- the conference report
(H Rept 884). The actions cleared the measure for the
President's signature.
BIii Signed. President Johnson signed HR 6927 on
Sept. 9. He said, "ln the next 35 years, we must literally
build a second America -- putting in place as many
- features
to begin a
that should be
fleet.
The Highway Safety Act of 1966
More -- much more
of America
believe
-- remains
will support
an aggressive
that the same Congress
giving the Secretary
coordinated
Federal
will be sympathetic
action
- be expected to provide the t:Jinirauc essentials to oointoin the
Cuban econooy. The possibilities
of a direct Soviet-US confrontation
in the event of a blockocle, ooo the icpoct of such action on our in
teroo.tiooo.1. position, are not considered
-
to begin a
that should be
fleet.
The Highway Safety Act of 1966
More -- much more
of America
believe
will support
coordinated
I urge direct
Federal
they address.
-- a $500 million,
standards
action to create
..
a
to our efforts
safety programs
-
To establish a Department of Housing and Community Development, and for other purposes.
1.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
2
tives of the United States of America in Oong,:essassembled,
3 That this Act may be cited as the Department
- and size of the Federal Budget.
I
I
---The selection/process
would proceed in two stages.
First, all American ~ities would be invited to make general
proposals for action programs
designed to have a major impact ,
on the living conditio'ns of thei
- , Jl003, 11047,.11161; and International
Aviation Pacilitiea Act, Sectiona·7, 8, 9)
2
.
The hoped for improvementain air safety and technological development
that lay behind these actions have been realized in satisfying measure,
largely because of PAA
-
--------------------------------------------------Other Senato1·s:.
DEMOCRATS
--··----Inouye
Okay
n..,.nc1olph
No commitment·
-
2/18
R SPU DLIC/.1'\S
Cc,op.:·r - ~o:1-co~nrniltal
y.
P, ~.r zo11 - c1~o~
2/ 28
?,/l3
2/ 18
Di'.:PART.MENT
OF TRANSPOR
HOUSE GOVERN11E:\''f
T.ATION
OPERA TIO~S
- capacity, shall nhnte hy 1'\'11,;on
of this ennctment.
Such causes of action mRy he 11sse11ed
h,· 01· 11~11inst.
the l'nited Stntt>s
or such officialof the Depnrtmt>nt 1u1111ny
he 11pp1·opri11te
.
0
•
September
9, 1965
Pub.
- 5 -
Law 89-1 74
79 STAT1
- is !inacne-ea----l-
by any institution supervised,
regulated or insured by the federal govern- ''ment. Such an extension would require action on the part of the Federal
Homo Loan Bank Board,
tion, the Comptroller
the Federal
of the Currency
Savings
-
Act to the issuance of safety regulations and other quasi-legislative
and quasi-judicial actions by the Secretary of Transportation, the
4
ESTABLISffiNG
A DEPARTMENT
ESTABLISmNG
OF TRANSPORTATION
~dministrators, the Maritime Board
- •••••••••••••••••••••••
(a) Community Action Programs •••••••. • ••••••••••••
(b) Bureau of Public Roads •••••.•••••.••••••••••••
(c) Clean Air, Clean Water and Solid Waste Disposal.
(d) Veteran1 Administration Mortgage Insurance ••••••
4
4
4
2 • Transfers Out /'f the Dep~rtment
-
problem•.
action
concentrated
t
affecting
or alone.
that the Department
Thi• doe• not mean,
•
-
or even any -
Nor doea it require that all
problem• of urbanization
in the new Department.
-~
be concerned with identifying,
however
- reorganizatiODa.·
Comment: Mq be 'badlT needed
alterD&tive
to merger.
11.
develop action
Beviev merger policy,
Recommendations See attacbecl
paper A.
proposals.
Comment: Basic review ot anti trust policy in transport area
overdwt. Several retora meaaures
- See all scanned items from file unit "Foundation For Action - 1965 Task Forces"
- Folder, "Foundation For Action - 1965 Task Forces [2 of 2]," Transportation Department, Legislative Background and Domestic Crises File, Box 1
- on the Transportation·
Department and on the Maritupe.
Administration
issue which you can u ■ e
• a ■ back-up when you contact various
Member• today and ov!r the weekend .
•
"'
•
Attachment.
'
J
•
....
•
•
THE DEPARTMENT
..
Why America
Needs A New Department
- .
- 16 While these numbers
to the increased
represent
number
are far too great
a slight
of vehicle
to be tolerated
miles
system
limited-access
highways
study group,
action program
Seventeen
is almost
the urgent
whose job
- )
that the basic decision is now
made and their job is to work with Katzenbach
and keep the CRS in
line.
I recommend
Approve
your approval
__________
of the above actions.
-:-
Disapprove
_________
_
Functions
In
- Urban
of
considering
those
visi6n
- was overstated.
As a
result of our reyiew, immediate action was taken at the lo
$7.9 million and
cal level to cancel requisitions
totaling
In April 1960
to reduce the 1960 program by $3-7 million.
we followed up the actions taken and were informed that di
-
RECOMMENDATIONS:
5-11
Category 1:
Category 2,
Category 3:
III.
U.S. Actions to be Undertaken Immediately
Subsequent U.S. Actions
Required Korean Actions
5
7
10
DISCUSSION2
12-38
A. The Present Situation:
General
Political
Issue of Corruption
Economic
- doubts concerning the efficacy of an interagency
group with a broad general charter, there is a definite role for
interagency consultat1ao and action with respect to certain spe
cf1ic transportation
function§ •. Enlarging the charter of the
existing
- See all scanned items from file unit "Foundation For Action - 1965 Task Forces"
- Folder, "Foundation For Action - 1965 Task Forces [1 of 2]," Transportation Department, Legislative Background and Domestic Crises File, Box 1
- to chaos and irfesponsibility.
They believe that
the railroads are really doing pretty well right now and it is. only the
small rail companies that are in difficulty and that this might be al
leviated by some actions taken by the big railroads
- ) Nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize
16 without appropriate action by Congress, the adoption, revi-.
17 . sion, or implementation of any transportation policy, or
18• investment standards or criteria contrary to or inconsistent
19 wit~ any