Discover Our Collections


Limit your search

Tag Contributor Date Subject Type Collection Series Specific Item Type Time Period

26 results

  • MEMORANDUM T H E W HITE HOUSE WASHINGTON F r id a y , A p r il 3, 1964 M r. James F o s burgh a r r iv e d at 10 o 'c lo c k this m orning and we had n ea rly two hours of a rt talk, about what would be nice to go with the ChildeH assam a nd the M
  • Arrangementlooooooooooooooo••··········· 29 39 JOINT COMMITTEEON ATOMIC ENERGY TOP SECRET­ oocuMENrNO... ~_e,..,.O __ ~I....__________ 11.L~ TABLE OF CONTENTS lo INTRODUCTION Ao Purpoae al Inapectlon lo General o "o o o o o o. o "o o o o o o o ,, o o o o o o o o o
  • in our memo to you). The fircst three may take a little time; but they will give· State it_s day in c.o u·r t. What ~e our objectives in this -crisis ? What is DeGaulle after? I I z~ terms o'f 1l0 i11tegrated military ~i of the West. 3, Y ~u do
  • , the NATO exercise scheduled to begin October 12, or to eliminate atomal play therefrom. The time urgency is due to the fact that the U. S. security authorities concerned must make final determinations covering procedures and regulations for transmitting
  • Nationa.l. Review NA'ro Letter Sec. Gen. NA'ro Curu Im:tf!'iM; MISCELLANEOUS (Cont'd) - 10 SOURCE CO~l:X:E?fI'IAL COPIES FREQUENCY DISPOSITION u l Weekly IL u l Weekly IL NewYork Times u 16 Do.ily and Sunda.y 15-M/R routes 1-IL N.Y
  • should cover the full range of activities involved in planning for the operation of existing forces and the development of future forces: intelligence, deployment, targeting, considerations affecting use at times of crisis, res.e arch, development
  • for are not in our favor submarine force, German aspirations -SECR:E'f (UK - ..SECRET - 8 aspirations for of Indian nuclear lost equality continuing to mount, program with backlash on Europe), time may equal lost On balance, seems in the US
  • c #27c rpt #27e rpt #27g rpt s s II s #27q rpt 7p o~ A '\· \~ ·o lo v1 w cn· iot "US Military Information Control Committee" 3p s 8/1/64 A -osNSAM 294 U. S. Nuclear and Strategic Delivery System Assistance to France RESTRICTION
  • of' the Atomic Energy Act. what Congressman Holifield for details some time lO If., for example., we have megatons here? Mr. Holifield asked if there would be any- objection to saying that we have (say) 6,000 weapons in Europe, and no one raised any
  • for your information. A 26 minute summary is also available on 16 mmfilm and we would be happy to show it at a time and place convenient to yourself and interested members of your staff. 2. (U) The participants in EPSILON I-65 and those of us in the Joint
  • :/28/62 A 1 p 01/18/63 A ! p 04/22/63 A 04/-09/-63 A 03/28/63 A from Bundy - ~r-et lOS No. conf. -#7 Hemu MSC Herno Mo. 230 ~ 3-q-D'i NSC .J/.9Action Secret 5lJ.t.A NS-C Mee~in-g -r}H RESTRICTION Conf. NSC NS£· Control DATE
  • Authority By &&& --TOP SECRET occasion of a slump in morale. He described the Vice President's mission as a ' 'tremendous success'' but thought i t should have been saved for a time of greater urgency. He said he had communicated these views
  • = Robert McNamara. DATE: 5/11/67 TIME: 9:40 AM CALLER: Robert McNamara Pages of Transcript: 2 pages Barbara Cline Archivist SERVICE SET . it . . ~~ r ,.) \. . B And just carry them out and depos t them across the street where we have allowed
  • *TRANSCRIPT ONLY OF THIS CONVERSATION; THERE IS NO RECORDING; TRANSCRIPT IS UNDATED AND DOES NOT IDENTIFY CALLER; NAME, DATE AND TIME OF CALL DETERMINED FROM CONTENT OF TRANSCRIPT AND DAILY DIARY
  • Reference No. 13740 November 20, 2008 Processing Note A copy of this transcript was interfiled on this date from the Alpha transcript series. Transcript only of this conversation; there is no recording. The time of this conversation
  • Telephone conversation # 13740, transcript, GEORGE CHRISTIAN and RON ZIEGLER, 11/15/1968, time unknown
  • organizations, either directly or through third parties, which would be reasonably likely to facilitate these efforts by significantly affecting timing, quality or costs or would identify the U.S. as a major supplier or collaborator. However
  • SECRE'f' The Reykjavik Ministerial Meeting of NATO A. Background The North Atlantic Council, in Ministerial session of Foreign Ministers will meet in Reykjavik, Iceland, June 24-25. This will be the first time that Iceland, a small but strategically
  • in planning for the operation of existing forces and the development of future forces: intelligence, deployment, targeting, considerations affecting use at times of crisis, res.e arch, development, production and budgeting, etc. The primary operational focus
  • FOR THE MEETING DID NOT COME AT A TIME .WHEN THE WHITE HOUSE SEEMED TO THINK THE THREAT OF A SOVIET INVASION OF RUMANIA WAS EASING, SAID, "I WOULD ~ NOT COMMENT AT ALL ON THAT." CHRISTIAN SAID THE MEETING WILL BE A "REVIEW SESSION OF A NUMBER OF THINGS." I I I
  • not feel that he should strike north before his security situation in the south is improved, possibly by this Fall. No strike to the north is required now, but there may be a psychological requirement t o hit North Vietnam at a later time . He feels
  • bombing, to see if the talks in fact become serious. If they attack across the DMZ or attack the cities, then we could resume at any time according to the conditions we have put to them. On the other hand, Secretary Rusk pointed out there would be costs
  • been placed under ca'tegoiT A. and one ot tvo DD'a scheduled in 2. Adnnce planned acquisition ot 2 DDa ihe crew necesS&l"J'to man the FY 1963. Neces8&1"7lead time third aubmar:lneis~. :lnvolTed will preclude upediting and deJ.a¥ scrapping ot 2 DE
  • of payments costs for our troops in NATO are temporary . They buy time but they don't cure the problem . Ovet· the Longer term we look for the British to do mo re in Europe which could enable us to do less . We can also anticipate the UK working towa r d some
  • with restrictions contained in the donor's deed of gift, GENERALSERVICES ADMINISTRATION GSA OC 73.495 GSA FORM 7122 (7-72) Jet statements out on Secy. Rusk - Spain 4 hours time - Yugoslav, Poland - How to handle negotiations at Berlin. 14-1 some discussions
  • ·. Since the early 1950' s th'e United States has carried a larger share .of ~he ·· .' . defense burden of the North Atlantic area tar a longer period ot time than was anticipated. Moreover, todo.y this couriti-y has great responsibilities
  • wou lc~ }:;e possible e::ce!_Jt after c. cec l c. r ~tion oi \·;c:r by Frc.nce . No Fre r.cil co:,1mitr.'.ent c c.n be given regc:rd ing such re - entry in time of N.=,To a l ert or crisis . Th e y a r e , howev er , ·w illing to perr.,.:..t c