Discover Our Collections


  • Tag > Digital item (remove)
  • Type > Text (remove)
  • Subject > Education (remove)
  • Collection > LBJ Library Oral Histories (remove)

12 results

  • obvious that Johnson had told him he wanted it approved. But Daley was an exception. Mayor Wagner in New York would sometimes talk to the President, but more often with Vice President Humphrey. Or Paul Screvane would talk to Humphrey. But only Chicago
  • ; outreach to encourage grant submission; congressmen, such as Carl Perkins and Adam Clayton Powell, getting involved in grant applications; mayors' involvement in CAP; problems with Chicago Mayor Richard Daley; White House involvement in CAP
  • accessible and other times when he was at work on some new strategy when he was not so accessible. Generally, when I saw him--and I never had to see him with any kind of daily urgency--I would submit a request through George Reedy or through Bill Moyers
  • for ESEA; Morse-Green rivalry; the Quie amendment; Congressman Fino objects to busing; reorganizing HEW; Keppel, Mayor Daley, and the Chicago quarrel with HEW; Henry Loomis and the Voice of America press conference; Wilbur Cohen evaluated; the heart-cancer
  • as well as any--we knew Ed I went to Chicago as Levi at the Universit y of Chicago. H: Who was the contact there? M: I can't recall. I guess Ed Levi had been on various task forces-­ LBJ Presidential Library http://www.lbjlibrary.org
  • formerly called services, su.c h as those for libraries and audiovisual aids. In addition, the new division included the program of grants-in-aid authorized the year before in Public Laws 815 and 87l;.--the program to help build nnd operate schools
  • Library oral histories: http://discoverlbj.org/exhibits/show/loh/oh -----~---- DEPAR'n1ENT OF EALTH, EDUCATION AiID WELF ARE Was hing ton, D.C. . Inte rvie w of I FRANCIS KEPPEL . I I by John Sing erho ff New York City Jcl.y 18, 1968
  • i- ·t S0 t '.1 is po int . f·./ . ;-1 r• . ­· c· 0 U~ o· 0i:.r '~ ,J~ · (-- .o' ­ ,_ ' ( i - a nd in -se rvice tra in i ng pro- by th is g 1·oup tha.t } g r am s focus on new r. ·1 ay~3 of organizing for 1ns ·truc·tion
  • because we have not learned proper evaluation techniques, nor do we have personnel trained to do the evaluation job. Henceforth, with our new techniques and with our newly trained personnel, we have the resources to evaluate our programs. Therefore
  • for two major new directions in Federal edu cation pr ograms. ·o ne of these directions can be sugge sted by the word "consolidation "-·­ some kind of pi.:lling together of existing programs so that th ey relate better to each other; so that t hey have
  • Ii A.cJ.r1ca. in order to accommodate the new crisis in And this meant tha t everybo4y who was in that milieu l I) I g I in either USIA or the V~ice was . accu~tome~ to having their resource availa bility cha ngedj owi1:tg
  • is ne1.. mission, the .new emph
  • 1962-1963 was Associate Commission in Bureau of Education Assistance Programs (BEEP); three divisions: 1. State and local elementary and secondary 2. Higher education 3. Manpower training; abrupt increase in staff in 1964 required new emphasis
  • ! r3o's~ essenti ally with the be ginning of the New Deal, ~hen 19 11 the I' ty10 thi ngs h ppened: One , the Nationa l Vocatio na l Edu- . 2 0 l cati on:;.l Prog1"'t..m.s were bro ught by l aw j_ nt o the Office of I 2 1 j Educatio n
  • /exhibits/show/loh/oh 20 I ( l 2 authorize new lcgisla.tinn • j .j As . He i i \\'ha t is by a long t . I. 4 consi~er c~ Senate i _; the Unitecl States both noted the other day shot ~ the ~ most compr c­ ~ hcnsivc p~ecc of hi ghe