Discover Our Collections


  • Tag > Digital item (remove)
  • Type > Text (remove)
  • Series > Files of Charles E. Johnson (remove)

36 results

  • . 3/19/2009 ---- Initials - THE NEW YORK TIMES, 'Pf[URSDAY, JANUARY 4, 1968 China', Late,t At~m.. Teat I• -Believed a Failure . ~ IIY JORNW. FINNEY -.i .. '1'1111..., Tenll'lmle WASRINGTON,Jan. :f-Pre- '· ,. UJ. lfetn • Ducr,,-c1 off
  • and provisions of the Treaty are being realized. ARTICLE IX 1. This Treaty shall be open to all States for signature. Any State which does not sign the Treaty before its entry into force in'.accordance with paragraph 3 of this Article may accede to it at any time
  • use of of nucloar weapons. I confim that the Memorandum Understanding -enclosed viith your letter correctly reJresent,s the position of my Government. J"t the s~~a time I note your reference to the continuing validity of the underta.'d.ngs g1van
  • on nuclear proliferation. By the time of the latest French pur­ chase request in late 1964, the U.S. had come out agalMt proliferation rnd decided a,alnst aiding France further In atomic delivery systems. The French are thqht to be· producing enoueh enriched
  • in advance of presentation . 3. The U.S -. statement would include language designed to provide a basis in the public record for re-opening the queo?tion of verification at a future time should it become desirable to do so and for withdrawing if necessar y
  • are still basically the same as·those developed in 1952, at a time when substantial U. S. a.nd Allied forces and resources were engaged in Korea and therefore not available in Europe. Because of this history ·and-the size of the nuclear shield provided
  • Arrangementlooooooooooooooo••··········· 29 39 JOINT COMMITTEEON ATOMIC ENERGY TOP SECRET­ oocuMENrNO... ~_e,..,.O __ ~I....__________ 11.L~ TABLE OF CONTENTS lo INTRODUCTION Ao Purpoae al Inapectlon lo General o "o o o o o o. o "o o o o o o o ,, o o o o o o o o o
  • \· rumpri!'r. our operating mr.di11111.'" :\,J. • mirnl Dnvicl I.. McDonald, then c-hief it :uul «'Xploiting its nnturnl re­ tlm Navy." ,-11ur.-1•:
  • this the approach is not likely leaders At the same time, security needs, to deter an Indian nuclear weapons program indefinitely. 4. Possibility of a "Peaceful" Explosion. other· immediate issue worth noting at this S~&IMITED ... There is one time
  • .of Fact • • • • By Joeeph Alaop The Jlirage of il,e Mirage ON FRIDAY, coldly d•fY· ln1 warnln1 of a plottNI u­ .... naUon, Gen. Charlea de Oaulle went to the Frenrh War Cola.p to •1et'tun the atud.nt hndy. Hla aubJut WU th• mlll­ lo be kllltid bf Saat
  • lnformaUon. (B) Closed by statute or by the agency which originated the documenL (C) Closed In accordance with restrictions contained In the donor's deed at gift. ' j P' DD~sn~ I u , , l\Ilt.l lll,} JdU1 USP f • , • I • r ) TH~ NEW YORK TIMES
  • repairs to the ship to place her in pre-casualty con­ dition. When this point is reached, there will be material and legal questions which must be negotiated and solved be­ fore we can determine what future course of action we will takeo At the time
  • , the NATO exercise scheduled to begin October 12, or to eliminate atomal play therefrom. The time urgency is due to the fact that the U. S. security authorities concerned must make final determinations covering procedures and regulations for transmitting
  • of ncr space and outer space. These rocket forces, promises categorically two zones relate quite diJfercntly to that Soviet rockets could be launched our security. from satellites "at any desirable time Outer space engulfs the limitless and at any point
  • ON AN AMBITIOUSWEAPONS PROGRAJ.'lo IN TERMS OF TIME> T.dE IMPORTANT DATEWASOCTOBER 1964, •1IBEN GIVEN THESE THE CHINESEEXPLOBED THEIR FIRST NUCLEAR DEVICEo xtx JlACTS, I DON'T THINK THE CHINESE DEVELOPMENT vlliICH IS DISCUSSED IN THE JOINT COJ.\'IMITTEE REPORT CHANGES
  • coatrilMator lo tbe We•n ..._ of Ua.e armr ..,x1 •. U:CUT DECLASSIFIED E.O 1,:,,::n, Sec. 3.4 Ei'.4.a,J~. NARA, D3to~-/~ .. - .,, ~-OUTGOING TELEGRAM Department ~ATE, OCOWCI . ~~w ~ of ·state I . • ' '\ 'SECRET '\ 53 1 °' f I~ ,..,, DAC
  • leaders that there was no need for our country to develop a FOBS system. While develop­ ment of it could be initiated at any time for relatively rapid deployment, our analyses conclude that it would not improve our strategic offensive posture
  • i4fo~1at~on of the U.S. delegation~ a space veh cle fox these purposes ca be taken to be one which completes at least one orbit around pe:d.od the earth, or entere outer space fox some substantial of time~ That is, the prohibition is not inte ded
  • to day i.Qple:JOnta~ioD G/PM:OOrwicksfeaa 1n tho on.._oi.nq ~ aetiona ..... •- iii&fl u iiS T: ...... 11111_ .. .,r'IIG'l•ttl!lO •-Nr .. ,... SiiaMil• DF.a.ASSIFIED - • ~J-D?o'?-~ ll,:C.1>. NARA,Date~ 11 lneJDO .:.0:::1:r.J~ ~;;.;.c
  • of' the Atomic Energy Act. what Congressman Holifield for details some time lO If., for example., we have megatons here? Mr. Holifield asked if there would be any- objection to saying that we have (say) 6,000 weapons in Europe, and no one raised any
  • the possibility of our denial being effective, at least to hinder the timing of the French nuclear effort. Therefore I would withhold approval until the British had been approached and given a brief period to respond. The IBM computer is in a much different
  • it nuclear forces. to delineate (France's timing, quality, country. which would be strategic nuclear or cost, or collaborator." and useful the export to that of denying to France those things weapons program) by significantly would identify
  • ~, ISoAEC ·1 l,SAH 03pMC 01,~DP 0tuRSR 0· D/139 W A 0304092 FEB 68 ,M AMEMBASSY TOKYO TO SECSTATE WASHDC8561 iNF'O CINCPAC a a 1t : t B 2 14I I A t TOKYO5298 CINCPACFOR POLAD SUBJECT1 SPACE COOPERATION REF1 Ao TOKYO5 91 Bo STATE tel8419. lo
  • problemo refer anc:1 ~ -,C representa­ Dept in New York which to l, on ad & const! ute At conclusioa points to mutually meeting, respective govern- ments: lo Within 60 days US will enriched uranium necessary Further, US will give
  • on the part of any foreign government by that time to take her. As you may know. there is a "last ditch" effort being made by a small group of private individuals, Acericans and Indians, to persuade the Indian Government to reverse its recent decision and take
  • to their is favorable no doubt attempt the unpopular cause. to bring who are likely nuclear ownership greatness "merchants have to be discreet, officers since pressure de Gaulle's connnitted than de Gaulle. these also time they on the general's
  • with respect to the Indians is to buy time during which, hopefully, we can move forward on broader fronts to bring under more permanent control the dangers inherent in the proliferation of nuclear weapons. /s/ DeanRusk Dean Rusk •• ·CEIVED ~-os I 0\1'S
  • . should be prepared to pay for such agreements. security optimum c. How far it is in the U.S. interest to go in meeting Indian concerns, what form such action mi'~t take, and what the timing might be. d. Whether need to be pursued. there are other
  • that the I:ldians have yet decided to begin weapons development. At the same time, evcrythiJ:1« the Indians have done so far would be compatible "1th a wce.J?.Onsproe;ram 11' at sane future date it appeared desirable to start one. 'lbis is probably no accident. One
  • be reflected in a treaty, subject only to reasonable safety precautions. The USSR has sought to qualify the right of access with such concepts as nreciprocityn and agreement as to the timing of visits. b. Reporting - Our treaty article as tabled provides
  • On the orders of the da7: .(Tn1naration] Mr. Real Caouette
  • regard and the deep affection in which I personally hold you. That regard and that affection are reflected throughout America. There is no truth to the rumor that your reputation as an economist prompted us to invite you here to visit us at budget time
  • HAMPTON BLVD. IF TRANSPORTAT ION INFORMATION IS 'PROVIDED WILL ARRANGE FOR PICKUP AT AIRPORT. 31 ACT 00 09 03 33 92 IP FLAGPLOT BFR CONTROL NO. 33733/ CIRCUIT NO. A422 PAGE 1 OF PAGES TIME 1 or DATE TIME GROUP RECEIPT 18/00382 JUN
  • anything to do with the Committee of Principals. It might be possible to find something by talking personally to Bromley, but the time hasn't seemed to arrive; if you want to talk with him, that might help. * Attached. Ina