Discover Our Collections


  • Tag > Digital item (remove)
  • Type > Text (remove)
  • Collection > National Security Files (remove)
  • Subject > Nuclear weapons (remove)

18 results

  • . 3/19/2009 ---- Initials - THE NEW YORK TIMES, 'Pf[URSDAY, JANUARY 4, 1968 China', Late,t At~m.. Teat I• -Believed a Failure . ~ IIY JORNW. FINNEY -.i .. '1'1111..., Tenll'lmle WASRINGTON,Jan. :f-Pre- '· ,. UJ. lfetn • Ducr,,-c1 off
  • in anticipation of eventual Presidential approval of the new guidance. Bennewitz in Defense also told me yesterday that they were hoping the NSAM could be issued shortly because the new guidance will have considerable impact on our approach to stockpiling. I think
  • - ,.~Lrv) ID NOYember 1959, howeYel', after these new agreemat• for coopen.tlon had 1one Into effect, the Committee wu lnformallJ adriaed of a plaD whenbJ a U. S. nuclear weapon, the MB-1 (th6''Genie"air•to-air rocket) the nucleai- componBnt, would be mated
  • . The 13 detections of 18 night launches detected by 440L comes out to only 70%. 2o @perational Readiness. The Feb ruary readiness date for the interim detection system is a new target date for initial operational capability. As of 1 November we were
  • on Atomic Energy December Dear Mr. 18, 1965 Secretary: I note that articles in the December 18 issue of the New York Times by Thomas J. Hamilton and in the Washington Post of the same date by Anatole Shub report in considerable detail on the plans
  • to explore questions some of the fundamental and iuvolved. from ~hose intereeted We are requesting conaents in ACDAand in the State ~partment. However, because of the immediate concern with the subject in New York,, I thought you might be interested
  • an arms control agreement between the Soviet Union and the United States. 9. How to reassure the US public and allies that deterrent posture is not impaired by the development Soviet and CHICOMstrategic capabilities. 10. antees Nlpahj the US of new How
  • that the next and succeeding dispersal plans focus princi ally on changes of this sort as far and that any recommendation for significant net increases in the stockpile beyond the level authorized by this NSAM wili be made only on the basis of new circum­
  • their resolutionJ and c) to define the membership, locus and terms of reference for a new Working Group or reconstituted Paris Working Group to continue the multilateral d1acusaion1. An under11tanding 1n advance of thia somewhat l.im1ted 1et of objectives would
  • or military areas. e. A Control Team examines the "Move Message" which each team provides and determines the positions of other countries and influences. A scenario projection is then prepared which advances the situation to a new point in time and requires
  • the atudy of to ■peed tb1 ■ problem. the •tudy of tho Indian nuclea~ problem au Mid be wow.cl laaue a NSAM ahortly. PRESERVATION COPY ~/DRAFT June•• 1966 MEMORANDUM FOR THI: PR.E;IDENT We picked the Indian nucleu in your new ••ri••of meettaa
  • only 5% to 15% of the capability of this new machine. Therefore it seems to me our denial would be effective to forestall a significant contribution to French nuclear warhead and delivery capabilities. Accordingly, I would propose IBM not be authorized
  • be continuously evaluated in terms of both the potential end intention of the recipient country to engage in n mrtional program. 7. Mo new control mechanisms or formalized inter-llecncy committee:i i,ra required, but improved coorclinntion, cr.chnnna of views
  • participants, a tran­ script of the video-film summary and commentary of BETA I & II-67, post-Critique comments of the Game Director and several game participants, transcripts of the Senior Critique and extracts from the Action-level Critique. The object
  • be required. The Secretary has worked out an agreement wit:4 Minister von Hassel under which our Joint Chiefs will work with the FRG military authorities to make a new joint study of the potential military effectiveness of ADM 1 s. The Secretary 1 s • request
  • _ _. ~. INB/WQl - D&yid la Mark Clldr Satt.rwait• IIIO!ll"F ="'DS-322 ..... REPRODUCTION FROM THIS COPY IS PROHIBITEDUNLESS "UNCLASSIFIED" February MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: 19, 1963 FOR THE RECORD .Alsop Column in Washington the French Mirage Bomber Post
  • conventional war stock­ pile objectives. (2) The assumptions, techniques, and goals used in the establishment of post-nuclear attack supply re­ quireme'n ts. · ECI.AS.SIFIED "'CONFIDENTIAL N5< nt.Uuf 11.ff' 8p 'ff NARA, Date I J. -~'11 - I
  • . MEMO - . REPORT cc, OTHER: 11/19/64 OTHER NO• .. ' ]894 J, X OST cy no 1 CLASS, Secret DESCRIPTION, I REC'D, (Mu POST REG. OFFICE NO. b• Unclas,lfudl DATE REPI...Y NECESSARY, NO REPt... Y NECESSARY: BY: ANSWERED, Fl1LE CODE