Discover Our Collections
Limit your search
Tag- Digital item (8)
- new2024-June (1)
- Johnson, W. Thomas, 1941- (2)
- Jones, James R. (2)
- Rostow, W. W. (Walt Whitman), 1916-2003 (2)
- Harriman, W. Averell (William Averell), 1891-1986 (1)
- Roberts, Juanita (1)
- Sisco, Joseph J. (1)
- Stevenson, Adlai E. (Adlai Ewing), 1900-1965 (1)
- Vance, Cyrus R. (Cyrus Roberts), 1917-2002 (1)
- 1968-09-25 (2)
- 1961-xx-xx (1)
- 1962-xx-xx (1)
- 1966-09-15 (1)
- 1967-09-13 (1)
- 1967-10-03 (1)
- 1968-11-25 (1)
- 1971-11-06 (1)
- United Nations (8)
- Vietnam (8)
- Arms control and disarmament (6)
- Middle East (4)
- Peace negotiations (3)
- Africa (2)
- China (2)
- Czechoslovakia (2)
- Nigeria (2)
- Apartheid (1)
- Berlin (Germany) (1)
- Civil disobedience (1)
- Draft (1)
- International economic policy (1)
- National Security Council (U.S.) (1)
- Text (8)
- Meeting Notes Files (3)
- Papers of Tom Johnson (2)
- LBJ Library Oral Histories (1)
- National Security Files (1)
- Vice President Papers of Lyndon B. Johnson (1)
- Meeting Notes (5)
- National Security Council Meetings Files (1)
- Transcripts of LBJ Library Oral Histories (1)
- Vice Presidential Security File (1)
- Folder (7)
- Meeting notes (6)
- Oral history (1)
8 results
- 504th RSCMeeting NSC Control No. 94 ------ - 8ECR:6't- NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL RECORD OF ACTIONS NSC Action 2456 Reaulta of 1962 Nuclear Teat Program to Date and Teat• Proposed for Remainder of Program a. Di1cuaaed a draft Department
- - French relations. Schiller had said with indignation that he had been summoned to Paris the week before the Bonn meeting. He had instead sent his Deputy, Schoellhorn. The French had then threatened drastic action if the Germans did not revalue
- , why were they no longer shelled at the Marine site at Conthien. Secretary McNamara said he did not know if this was a result of our action or their decision. The Pre sic.ent asked if we shou1d move our people bad:;:, as ha.s been sugge s·i:e d
- on the adoption of the agenda. But there was never any subsequent action taken, not because of any lack of initiative in this regard by President Johnson or the Johnson Administration, but rather because the Russians didn't want to have LBJ Presidential
- pass. But I don't think it will and they will say it was a rebuff because of our unreasonable and inhumane action in the bombing. On balance, that would be a loss in my judgement. Goldberg said I don't agree. Katzenbach said he agrees with McNamara
- of many delegates and figure heavily in the general debate . . The Soviets and other Conununist delegations are likely to attack our policy and actions, and we think it probable that some non-aligned nations will display concern, ·if not out right
- that have so far been willing to criticize Soviet intervention. In determining what actions the Assembly might take concerning Cz echoslovakia, there are at least three perti nent consid erations for the U.S.: what 't\lOuld b·e he lpful to the Czechs, what
Folder, "September 25, 1968 - 12:17 p.m. National Security Council," Papers of Tom Johnson, Box 4
(Item)
- revanchism", Viet-Nam, and the Middle East) and generally will try to place Czech events in a cold war context in hopes of silencing the non aligned countries that have so far been willing to criticize Soviet intervention. In determining what actions