Skip to main content
-
Tag >
Digital item
(remove)
-
Subject >
Peace negotiations
(remove)
-
Subject >
Bombing, Aerial
(remove)
Limit your search
Tag
Contributor
Date
Subject
Type
Collection
Series
Specific Item Type
Time Period
6 results
- talking about either substance of stopping or row
we get together for talks.
The odds are against talks at this time. I think there is a poss_ibility,
although not a very good one. The chances of getting Vietnam resolved
before November, 1968, 02pends
- resolution of Vietnam.
Unfortunately , it is my conclusion, and that of all of my principal advisers,
that a total cessation of bombing at this time would not in fact lead to
TOP SECRET
SERVICE SET
i~l!l!T!Me t-lOTES COPVRIGJ~+ED
?.walica•i 0 0 Requires
- folde1. W. TAeMat Jgbn;on
- 2There is a necessary preoccupation of our national leadership with
this problem. At the same time there is much anxiety and dismay
in America over the 'Wlr.
Our conviction is that we should contract our operations
- of the
bombing cessation.
The reply fr om Hanoi follows:
At the present time the United States is continuing the escalation of
the war in an extremely grave manner. In these conditions words of
peace are only trickery. At a time when the United States continues
- escaped the bombing in Hanoi just
because two professors are meeting. August 23 is the last time Hanoi
was hit. Does that message (referring to the proposed message which
was to be transmitted from Kisinger to Bo) include the halt of the
August 25
- of weakness.
ED 12958
3.4( b1l1J>2 5Vrs
(CJ
Secretary McNamara said we should push our view on the South
Vietnamese to get them moving
Ambassador Bunker said that these things take time, that we cannot
rush it. The Viet Cong are their enemy we must remember