Skip to main content

Discover Our Collections

11 results

Folder, "Military Use of Space," Files of Charles E. Johnson, NSF, Box 15 (Item)

way. TIM Val ... ata&ee u.. .. ; .,.,...... •• u -- le ,.aw e,...aaft. ~.. Imm• -..new• ..ti.. la -,ace., to~ • ....... er •eue, ntef..-matep-lrNl.,•••CwecUtoexam to .. __. ....... wa..--.1l11ht.a1 p..._.-~. •cl .. t, Metile JIily 30

Folder, "Bombs in Orbit - General (Ballistic Missiles in Orbit, FOBS, MOBS, etc.)," Files of Charles E. Johnson, NSF, Box 11 (Item)

which originated the document. (C) Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in the donor's deed of gift. 1/13/2009 QJ ~ NEWS CONFERENCE of SECRETARY OF DEFENSE Robert S. McNamara at Pentagon Friday, November 3, 1967 * * * Mr. Goulding

Folder, "Cooperation in Space - US - Germany," Files of Charles E. Johnson, NSF, Box 13 (Item)

. Germany They There ei-e 1IO easy answers to any of these questions. will require a new spirit of trust and cooperation am:mg all the nations of the world. That spirit, Chancellor Erhard, is embodied 1n the friendship of our two great nations. And so

Folder, "Outer Space Treaty [2 of 2]," Files of Charles E. Johnson, NSF, Box 16 (Item)

this morning from New York. Ben~«~d~ Executive Secretary Enclosure: As stated. -COWFIDENTIAL ENCLOSURE * ., -~-~-.,.......,. ....... ---..----- .. ,.__ ,.,. t If• • -- ' • it . t ..•.... it .,._..i. CQNi!II>iNTJAJ FOR MOYERS.AT.TEXAS

Folder, "NSAM # 285: Cooperation with the USSR on Outer Space Matters, 3/3/1964," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 3 (Item)

to test the Soviets 1 intentions by further conversation. If, however, the next round of conversation is fruitless, NASA should be requested to develop some specific action proposal that would represent a new initiative on our part. At the last meeting

Folder, "Bombs in Orbit - Committee of Principals," Files of Charles E. Johnson, NSF, Box 11 (Item)

By.....__->-.. 'An,A, Da.......__.........,P'I 7 Referring to recent discussions in New York, the ·secret·ary recalled that he had informed Gromyko that while there appeared to be agreement in principle on refraining from placing weapons . of mass destruction- in orbit

Folder, "NSAM # 271: Cooperation with the USSR on Outer Space Matters, 11/12/1963," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 2 (Item)

response to the proposals for cooperation already made by President Kennedy and by you. (b) No new high-level US initiative is recommended until the Soviet Union . has had a fur-ther opportunity (possibly ·t hree months) to discharge its current obligations

Folder, "Outer Space Treaty [1 of 2]," Files of Charles E. Johnson, NSF, Box 16 (Item)

placed ln orbi around th e RatheT, this resolution c lls for abstention. It would repreae t inte tional r cognit on that the a rac in oute sp ce at no be ex nded Lnto thi new nvir en that while a es eking w ye of l iting and rd cing ezieting P111U1nuants

Folder, "NSAM # 300: Review of Alternative Communications, Navigation, Missile and Space Tracking and Data Acquisition Facilities, 5/19/1964," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 4 (Item)

Chile plus Peru and/or Ecuador are denied. i. Establish two new stations, one in Hawaii, and one in either Fiji Islands or American Samoa. A mobile station for special equatorial coverage would possibly be required. 2. Cost: Approximately $14.ooo

Folder, "NSAM # 50: Official Announcement of Launching Into Space of Systems Involving Nuclear Power in any Form [Revised], 4/10/1965," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 1 (Item)

in connection with the orbiting and testing of nuclear devices in space. This new draft would replace the old NSAM No. 50 which had been originally issued in connection with orbiting TRANSIT satellites in 1961.- It has been checked out with ·t he responsible

Folder, "NSAM # 354: U.S. Cooperation with European Launcher Development Organization (ELDO), 7/29/1966," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 9 (Item)

which they are willing to support. This has the effect of withholding specific Presidential approval of every single detailed item of the long statement. I believe, however, that the new form will have the same value as the long one without