Discover Our Collections


12 results

  • .......................... Section I. II. WHATSHOULD THE FORCEDETER? ................ III. AVOIDINGANOTHER WAROF 'lllE KIND ONE HAS KOOWN •..•..••... IV. V. VI. PARTII. 11 o • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 16 HOWSHOULDTHE FORCEBE USEDIN WAR?........ 23 nIE TRIGGER
  • capability may be pertinent. These concerns relate importantly to Indi~'s ~ - 6 to India's future position vis-a-vis Communist China in Asia, and to whether an effort to "go it alone" militarily (including nuclear as well) will come to be regarded
  • • • • . . • • • • Nuclear Sharing. • , . • • . • • • • (vi) The Plowshare Loophole . . • • . . • • • • 4. Conclusion. 5. Recommendation .. NLJ .....• • ...• of an Indian DECLASSIFIED E.O. 13292, Sec. 3.5 By • . . . . . . . . . . . . . ott- , , a_
  • THIS VIEWWITHABOVESTATEMENT.IT IS MYFEELINGa PARTICULARLY IN VIEW OF EXCHANGE Of IDEASTHATTOOKPLACE DURINGRUSKfSVISIT ANDPROBABILITY Of U.K. ENTRYINTO COMMON MARKET THATWERE-EXAMINE OUR-PRESENT NUCLEAR SITUATIONVIS-A-VIS THE SIX NATIONSANDNATOUSINGCURRENT DISCUSSIONOF MRBM•SIN
  • Party to this Treaty so desiring may, pursuant to a special agreement or agreements, obtain any such benefits on a bilateral basis or through an appropriate international body with adequate representation of non-nuclear-weapon States. f ARTICLE VI Each
  • and subassemblies being considered here and to attain a reasonable production rates- ma.n.n.0unced spot checks of facilities subsequent to th-e ir~itial !.'1$pe ....tion should be adequate. 7. Undeclared Production Inspection teams wou.ld vis:1t, in accordance
  • be bcereattld 1D • ~-; -::::.: ~:::!:::-::~:!'.93 c:-..::::,ltl c:! 01:= .:~;,~::10:1 u:::_.: ~:... ~::::.:.,:i t.:> t.::!~=~~~ •~Q::ly. ,::.:..~i:as vith ?r::r.ca do vi~ ~ cu,ply of tcee Wo:r=:, of U•233 ~~ich t~o !::~ h--vc :c~~~tccl to~ uoa