Discover Our Collections


  • Tag > Digital item (remove)
  • Subject > Nuclear weapons (remove)
  • Series > National Security Action Memorandums (remove)

8 results

Folder, "NSAM # 322: Guidelines for Discussions on the Nuclear Defense of the Atlantic Alliance, 12/17/1964," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 6 (Item)
  • their resolutionJ and c) to define the membership, locus and terms of reference for a new Working Group or reconstituted Paris Working Group to continue the multilateral d1acusaion1. An under11tanding 1n advance of thia somewhat l.im1ted 1et of objectives would
Memorandum # 322, Guidelines for Discussions on the Nuclear Defense of the Atlantic Alliance, 12/17/1964 (Item)
  • authority capable of making the decision to use nuclear weapons, the United States recognizes that this will create a new situation in which reconsideration of various provisions of.the charter would be appropriate. In any event, revision of the charter
Folder, "NSAM # 334: Re Request for Nuclear Weapons Dispersal Authorization, 6/1/1965," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 7 (Item)
  • that the next and succeeding dispersal plans focus princi ally on changes of this sort as far and that any recommendation for significant net increases in the stockpile beyond the level authorized by this NSAM wili be made only on the basis of new circum­
Memorandum # 334, Re Request for Nuclear Weapons Dispersal Authorization, 6/1/1965 (Item)
  • recommendation for significant net increases in the stockpile beyond the level authorized by this NSAM will be made only on the basis of new circum­ stances. in.f" ....--- -t\~ -McGeor ge Bundy UMClASS!FIED "'FOP eE ffR:l!i'i' Il:1!13T '.Pt?CY !!1' :B A'l
Folder, "NSAM # 305: Nuclear Weapons Dispersal Authorization for FY 1964, 6/16/1964," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 5 (Item)
  • MEMORANDUM FOR MR. BUNDY SUBJECT: Nuclear Weapons Dispersal Plan for FY 1964 Although this FY 1964 Dispersal Plan is only good through .June 3 0, and a new FY 1965 paper is now under development, we still need Presidential approval of the 1964 Plan to satisfy
Folder, "NSAM # 345: Nuclear Planning, 4/22/1966," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 8 (Item)
  • might also say that you understand the work on nuclear sharing is going very well and that you look forward to receiving the results, as well as the suggestions for construc­ tive new departures in NATO and vis-a-vis the East.) There are three
Folder, "NSAM # 321: Review of Strategic Stockpile Objectives, 12/1/1964," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 6 (Item)
  • in anticipation of eventual Presidential approval of the new guidance. Bennewitz in Defense also told me yesterday that they were hoping the NSAM could be issued shortly because the new guidance will have considerable impact on our approach to stockpiling. I think
Folder, "NSAM # 345: Nuclear Planning, 4/22/1966," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 8 (Item)
  • themselves not to launch new na.tional nuclear programs. Three alternative forms which that force might take are set forth below, beginning with assignment and progressing toward joint ownership of delivery _s ystems and warheads. . 1) · 1