Discover Our Collections


  • Tag > Digital item (remove)
  • Subject > Nuclear weapons (remove)

11 results

  • LBJ Presidential Library http://www.lbjlibrary.org ORAL HISTORY TRANSCRIPT Lyndon B. Johnson Library Oral Histories [NAID 24617781] INTERVIEWEE: DWIGHT A INK INTERVIEWER: DAVID G. McCOMB More on LBJ Library oral histories: http
  • See all online interviews with Dwight A. Ink
  • Ink, Dwight A.
  • Oral history transcript, Dwight A. Ink, interview 1 (I), 2/5/1969, by David G. McComb
  • Dwight A. Ink
  • after his attack there was a NATO meeting in Paris. I went to the meeting; the wives went along. Lyndon had had this attack, and Eisenhower offered his presidential plane that had bedrooms on it if Lyndon wanted to go and thought he ought to go and get
  • ; Formosan Resolution; Tax Bill; Disarmament; Highway Bill; Natural Gas Act of 1956 and reason Eisenhower vetoed it; investigation of Bobby Baker and attempts to get testimony from Walter Jenkins
  • went to Washington to advise President Eisenhower that we should be aggressive about meeting the challenge of Sputnik rather than LBJ Presidential Library http://www.lbjlibrary.org ORAL HISTORY TRANSCRIPT Lyndon B. Johnson Library Oral Histories
  • . Having decided that this would be a worthwhile thing to undertake I then obtained permission from the president of Johns Hopkins, who at that time was Milton Eisenhower and who was rather enthusiastic about my taking such a responsibility in the Federal
  • to build nuclear power plant. ~ President Eisenhower offers 5-point disarmament plan that could follow proof of USSR peaceful intent. Vishinsky revives USSR proposal for unconditional· ban on weapons of mass destruction. USSR claims to have H-bomb
  • issue between Washington and Paris, and a major underlying reason for the • French campal,:n to .end )'.llil• ita.ry "subordination" to NATO and the United States. •. • The differences go back to 1957',whell the Eisenhower Ad­ nunistratlon decided
  • on the staff. There was no justification for having an agricultural economist as a member of the council, even though that had been the tradition under Eisenhower and Truman, I guess. F: Did the President ever voice the opinion that in one sense agriculture
  • to the supreme armament." condition was the appearance of inter­ in the supreme and up to now excluded and sufficient is "the according oneself here] Eisenhower entry inferior levels to be called 115 a statement of defense, ''What is at stake