Discover Our Collections


  • Tag > Digital item (remove)
  • Subject > Nuclear weapons (remove)

Limit your search

Tag Contributor Date Subject Type Collection Series Specific Item Type Time Period

57 results

  • .... THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON June 1, 1965 NATIONAL SECURlTY ACTION MEMORANDUM NO. 334 TO: The Secretary of State The Secretary of Defense The Chairman, Atomic Energy Commission The President has noted the request for nuclear weapons
  • National Security Action Memorandums
  • The Acting Secretary Future Ste;pa. on ANF/lU: 9·1955 ACTION MEMORANDUM In the month and a half since NASM 322 was issued., there ha.ve baon a fev ofticisl.•lovel A?'IF/if!Jl discussions, notably betw'eon the Germano o.nd the Dr1t1oh. While some movement
  • Folder, "NSAM # 322: Guidelines for Discussions on the Nuclear Defense of the Atlantic Alliance, 12/17/1964," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 6
  • National Security Action Memorandums
  • is subject to first providing for the requested DoD dispersal requirements. ~.I~) The current authority for dispersal of nuclear weapons in support of non-U. S. forces is derived from National Security Action Memorandum No. 143, as modified, and subsequent
  • Folder, "NSAM # 305: Nuclear Weapons Dispersal Authorization for FY 1964, 6/16/1964," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 5
  • National Security Action Memorandums
  • Folder, "NSAM # 269: Procedure for Approval of Certain Nuclear Tests, 10/31/1963," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 2
  • National Security Action Memorandums
  • -proliferation in coordinated for military a pro• defense action in the contingencies. This memorandum examines a number of general iesues nuclear terms, form of the undertaking, and/or by the two major nuclear or by sny single or formal agreement
  • developed by "action level" teams. The exact format of each game varies according to the special requirements that may be posed, but in general, FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY A-1 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY these are "desk" or "manual" type games in which teams meet
  • with restrictions contained in the donor's deed of gift. NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRAT I ON. NA FORM 1429 (6-85) THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON SI; CRE'i' . NATIONAL SECURITY ACTION MEMORANDUM NO. 345 MEMORANDUM FOR: The Secretary of State
  • Folder, "NSAM # 345: Nuclear Planning, 4/22/1966," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 8
  • National Security Action Memorandums
  • of and concurs in the above action. It has been noted that previous determinations have been made which permit limited dissemination of the atomic information involved to NATO member states and the Channel Command and that the proposed determination would permit
  • is, of vulnerability position, Denmark and Norway enter is, military however, The Swedes, given special in Stockholm of the Swedish sense to the Soviet Israel The argument on Sweden sufficiently as a rational course costly that for the of action
  • we recommend that NSAM 294 be construed to DECLA.. I i E.0. BycJ»k ID l ~ .3-IZ~'i a~o1'=» - 2 call for denial of exports covered by NSAM 294 only when our denial action would be effective to impede the French nuclear weapons program
  • 79 6 3 c, UBJECT FOBS f . ON 3 NOV ~MBER SECRE TAR Y MCNAM ARA ANNOUNCED THAT THE SO ~IE TS ~PPEAR To 8~ DEVE LOPING t f ~ACTION AL o ~e ITA L AOMBAROM ENT SY STEM irO BS)• DE FENSE CA ~LE 19 9 '.3 Cb El~G R~PEATE D TO ALL AO D~ ESS~SSI QUOTES T~E
  • _eowMANV ~~~!~R - Y RECD: 3 4:55 P~ FEBRUARY _JE~UP _JO FROM: OTTAWA AMEMBASSY _KOMER _MOODY JEEDY _$AUNDERS· _$AYRE _THOMSON G H p USIA NSC ACTION: INR CIA DATE: NSA • FEBRUARY 3 5 PM DOD SCI E AEC COM L'l'ff TRSY RMR Ci IIFlB!!!IH I
  • of action is not likely to prove successful. The attendance at this meeting will be much more limited than at the last Senior Review. They are presently saving a place ~for ~ Authority By~'_., you. DECLASSIFIED '-.) %5"-tt/-3 N~ l ' • . H-1~D
  • over Canada would make it extremely difficult politically .. The Soviets have never taken another interpretation. · They have never admitted their actions. DR. HORNIG: There will be two types of reaction. Here in this country I know the reaction
  • derived from the United States. The Director, DIA did not feel that any drastic action was justifiec. on the basis of the &?ecific evidence cited to date. General Carroll believel that we should take account only of the broader ?roblem in stating intellige
  • ...... ss 1382 , • ACTION: AmembaaayPAB.IS- Jt8 ~ \ ,..~ TOPOL PRI USMiaalon GENEVA TODIS PRIORITY 13 ,u ~•-·,, I INFO: G SP L AmembaaayANKARA (by pouch) " ATHENS (by pouch) " BONN " BRUSSELS (by pouch) COPENHAGEN (by pouch) THE HAGUE