Discover Our Collections


5 results

  • be necessary. 3. We should avoid direct threats that we would cut back (or eliminate) economic aid in the event of a pro­ nuclear decision. However, if India's leaders should ask us what our reaction woµld be, we should consider expressing the view that we
  • ..... ,.. .... ef lta _, ladla Jau --•• la eacb cu• We baYe t. declcle MW c:Wc•. ... •--• It ••:aid N wonla ._ •••• 1. ladla c...W Mly • DD aay ef..., •• mlp& tq .. laa-• IMla elf .. Wlalcll ar• •• ....... ... tnad• a. ps-, ■•ale cvnat
  • assistance. It countered the ChiCom threat by deploy­ ing US air defense, fighter aircraft and air transport units to India and a nuclear capable naval task force into the Bay of Bengal. The Kremlin continued military and economic aid at current levels
  • of "going nuclear" expenditures future ·aid levels.· dual emphasis.on and on the need to hold down defense can be expected to encou~age India·'s to hold the line a$ainst nuclear weapons. unless ways can be found of 111eeting India's
  • Bundy ... Policy Team • • • • • .• .. ...... . . . . .. White House LGen David A. Burchinal • • • • JCS Mr. William S. Gaud • • • AID LGen Andrew J. Goodpaster, USA. • General Harold K. Johnson, USA. • Hon. u