Discover Our Collections


  • Tag > Digital item (remove)
  • Subject > India (remove)
  • Series > Files of Charles E. Johnson (remove)

Limit your search

Tag Subject Type Collection Series Specific Item Type Time Period

5 results

  • be necessary. 3. We should avoid direct threats that we would cut back (or eliminate) economic aid in the event of a pro­ nuclear decision. However, if India's leaders should ask us what our reaction woµld be, we should consider expressing the view that we
  • ..... ,.. .... ef lta _, ladla Jau --•• la eacb cu• We baYe t. declcle MW c:Wc•. ... •--• It ••:aid N wonla ._ •••• 1. ladla c...W Mly • DD aay ef..., •• mlp& tq .. laa-• IMla elf .. Wlalcll ar• •• ....... ... tnad• a. ps-, ■•ale cvnat
  • of "going nuclear" expenditures future ·aid levels.· dual emphasis.on and on the need to hold down defense can be expected to encou~age India·'s to hold the line a$ainst nuclear weapons. unless ways can be found of 111eeting India's
  • funds under Public Law 480. (2) A formal proposal of the program would be made to Madras University by FSU and Madras University would forward this program to UGC for approval·. UGC would seek AID financing from the United States and use , rupees
  • 43 Action . SCI · Info SS GPM · SP SC L H NEA p I ­ I.l' USIA NSC :INR CIA ·NSA I· I. ~ ;I ~ DOD 1',11 SFW AID tI. cu COM I I f DOI INT UNCLASS IF I,=ED::::-..--­ l RSR J I It : t I ! I l 1 1 l {r