Discover Our Collections


Limit your search

Tag Contributor Date Subject Type Collection Series Specific Item Type Time Period

61 results

  • challenge. Until they do. month-to ...mouth action make• good sense. (See Phil Potter atory in the Baltimore Sun ,wi.erday But none ot u aee • any point ill leldng the morning, Tab A). pipeline break. ao I would like to authorise Komer to give the areea
  • to find way• and mean• of •haring with the local official ■ in Aaia the knowled1e that America baa 1ained from facing aimilar problem•. Certain type• of machinery already exiat, auch aa the "ai ater citie•" which are ••t up throup the People to People
  • was t'eferring to, I told him that I personally doubted any action would l.>etaken that quickly on anything Sec~etary Fr~eman had in mind. simply because there WO\ud not e time for the ne.cesaary di.•cua1i0neJ here. 1 At 3:30 1 had ,an hour•s talk with Iftikar
  • THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON June 10, 1966 · NATIONAL SECURITY ACTION MEMORANDUM NO. 351 TO: The Secretary of State SUBJECT: Indian Nuclear Weapons Problem At the meeting of the National Security Council on June 9, 1966, the President noted
  • National Security Action Memorandums
  • THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON December 17, 1965 NATIONAL SECURITY ACTION MEMORANDUM NO. 339 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE SUBJECT: Critical Indian Food Situation I am deeply concerned on humanitarian grmmds with the near famine
  • National Security Action Memorandums
  • ,, THE WHITE HOUSE W.J>.5HINGTON August 1, 1966 NATIONAL S ECURITY ACTION MEMORANDUM NO. 355 TO: The Secretary of State SUBJECT: The Indian Nuclear Weapons Problem, further to NSAM 351 The President has approved the recommendations
  • National Security Action Memorandums
  • , June 9, 1966 6:00p.rn. () 'V J '· {, ' ~· .If" \\ Mr. President: For your approval. This National Security Action Memo- \~ randum instructs the Secretary of / State to produce by July 15 specific recommendations for your considera­ tion as to how
  • Folder, "NSAM # 351: Indian Nuclear Weapons Problem, 6/10/1966," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 8
  • National Security Action Memorandums
  • THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON .SE CRET - February 8, 1964 NATIONAL SECURITY ACTION MEMORANDUM NO. 279 MEMORANDUM FOR T HE SECRETARY OF STATE THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE S'QBJECT: Military Assistance to India and Pakistan I have no objection
  • National Security Action Memorandums
  • SECURITY ACTION MEMORANDUM NO. 339 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE SUBJECT: Critical Indian Food Situation I am deeply concerned on humanitarian grounds with the near famine conditions which are developing in India, and which may requi~e
  • Folder, "NSAM # 339: Critical Indian Food Situation, 12/17/1965," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 7
  • National Security Action Memorandums
  • ·: ·~ . - - ••• ·, J J ,.. •. > :'.~:,r ..:~ ~\r~·~\ !\ : \ : •,i " #-.-----~-4---------- . ·-..--· · -----------~· ~ # --~~-: - - -- - - - T II E \Y I II TE l r 0 C S E WAS lll :NGTON .SECREY - February 8, 1964 NATIONAL SECURITY ACTION MEMORANDUM
  • Folder, "NSAM # 279: Military Assistance to India and Pakistan, 2/8/1964," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 2
  • National Security Action Memorandums
  • developed by "action level" teams. The exact format of each game varies according to the special requirements that may be posed, but in general, FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY A-1 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY these are "desk" or "manual" type games in which teams meet
  • . Rostow, White House Staff, dated , June 11, 1968 1 stated th~t plans were being made to · trans­ fe:rr ANTON BRUUN to GSA for disposal. Prior to taking. this action, the State Department and the Marine Science Council , Staff were formally asked
  • of action is not likely to prove successful. The attendance at this meeting will be much more limited than at the last Senior Review. They are presently saving a place ~for ~ Authority By~'_., you. DECLASSIFIED '-.) %5"-tt/-3 N~ l ' • . H-1~D
  • suggests that you might wish to advise the President of this action. I recommend that we wait to see what replies he gets from State and the Marine Sciences Council before saying anything more to the Pres.ident in this matter. I attach Haworth's memorandum
  • of the matter is that we seem. to be achieving an agricultural revolution in. India. In part, of course, this is attributable to India'• own dawn­ ing r~alization of past foWes, but our action on PL 480 was unquestionably a major catalyst. Note the attached
  • of tea;: gas. McNa~"-;.-a said that the use of tear gas must be h~:ncil~d cai·efally in the right operation and that he 'Yas opposed to pushing West:moreland ~o use it within the next few days unless \Ve~tmorcfa.~d felt such. action was desirabie
  • repairs to the ship to place her in pre-casualty con­ dition. When this point is reached, there will be material and legal questions which must be negotiated and solved be­ fore we can determine what future course of action we will takeo At the time
  • try to bring Ayub around , s eeking to avoid any action which might cause him to think he was being forced to the brink. I The President wondered how much we unounts of aid we were giving to India nuch our aid to Pakistan was runni n · ; ~ .l..!1
  • was already meeting on Kashmir , State felt any r eply should be delayed for a. few days . There is no indication in NSC files that further action was t aken. - 5 . This collection of documents from Febr uary, March a nd April show the effort to reevaluate