Discover Our Collections


  • Tag > Digital item (remove)
  • Subject > Defense (remove)
  • Type > Text (remove)
  • Collection > National Security Files (remove)

20 results

  • has no objection to consideration of this item at this time. z. The prohibition against initiating discussion of this subject with Canada contained in NSAM Z48 of June 3, 1963, is accordingly withdrawn. . DECIASmlED 1.0. 12356, Sec. 39' ~ 9.1·S~J
  • ~ ,,, ....... - I I • .,.. 'lo u j I i• I -.:,, ... • ....... ._ • ... I I I I /IL ~ . 31? t DEPUTY UNDER SECRETARY OF STATE WASHINGTON June 12, 1964 -~EGRET MEMORANDUM FOR THE HONORABLE MCGEORGE BUNDY, TIIB WHITE HOUSE SUBJECT: NSAM 298 on U.S
  • WITHDRAWAL SHEET (PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARIES) .C: QRM OF DOCUMENT #1 memo Yl=~·~.+-z.eJ. #2c rpt CORRESPONDENTS OR TITLE Thompson to Bundy TS 6p ~l 1~k(f 1J/S::oof..-~- I 6.lo-i:t "Report in Response to NSAM 300 ... " 16 p [Partial duplicate
  • duplicate of #2c, NSAM 301] s ~ undated A 7/29/64 A 'l- It> -~3 NL. cl&/3-i,,S- s- 1p [Duplicate of #2g, NSAM 301] [Duplicate of #2i, NSAM 301] 114t-HfleJOO~~--J.;~~0f-t6--*.t8t.~~llffilistfftt:ef-~ s 4p [Duplicate of #2j, NSAM 301] #41 memo lo
  • 27, 1964 MEMORANDUM FOR McGEO GE BUNDY THE WHIT HOUSE Subject: "Concord Squadron" Cruise in Indian Ocean lo On receipt of NSAM 289 a State/Defense message was sent to a ll pos t s in the area trans­ mitting the tentative schedule: April 4 passage
  • to incorporate your de sired changes. I have . reduced the time span covered in the preliminary notification from two years to one year, and have asked that a new schedule be supplied each quarter, instead of merely requesting monthly corrections to the original
  • c #27c rpt #27e rpt #27g rpt s s II s #27q rpt 7p o~ A '\· \~ ·o lo v1 w cn· iot "US Military Information Control Committee" 3p s 8/1/64 A -osNSAM 294 U. S. Nuclear and Strategic Delivery System Assistance to France RESTRICTION
  • of' the Atomic Energy Act. what Congressman Holifield for details some time lO If., for example., we have megatons here? Mr. Holifield asked if there would be any- objection to saying that we have (say) 6,000 weapons in Europe, and no one raised any
  • lo ent and release procedures which had been developed b '.:', .s lJ ) an en orse y the Joint Chiefs of Staff. r review o employment and release procedures has been completed. As a result of our ·review I propose the following: a. I • b
  • Will remain 11\ for.ee lo~ whatever level ol fun41ng the Department of Defense may d•t•nnlne· until the program i• rexnove4 f~om the hlghe•t national defeus.e category a.t the request ol tbe Deputmel\t ~ I>efen••· { i •ne!I) W. w. w. SM K eeny:jb: ll-12-68
  • purposes will not be adopted at this time. · I 2. Limited war stockpile objectives will be based upon: a. estimated essential shortages during a two-year emergency period {as opposed to the present three-year planning period), and b. the assumption
  • House, this would be an inopportune time to effect any changes to a NASM. It would be better to defer revisions of NASM 283 until after new staff has taken over. In the interim, the SIG will issue necessary instructions. Revised wording to be developed
  • organizations, either directly or through third parties, which would be reasonably likely to facilitate these efforts by significantly affecting timing, quality or costs or would identify the U.S. as a major supplier or collaborator. However
  • of our intentions in Japan, Southeast Asia, Europe--and in Russia and Communist China, and (b) to expTh.in the good sense of the move to the Congress and the U.S. public. 6. As regards timing, I should like two alternatives to be ex­ plored: one
  • continue to be valid, i.e., that it remains in the U.S. interest to develop alternatives to U.So facilities in Pakistan and that measures toward that end are feasible. 2o The passage of time, however, has necessitated certain changes in specific
  • of ·this month so that there ·may be time for careful consideration and decision before my meeting with Prime Minister Wilson on December 7 and 8. • " SECBE'iE' .,.
  • &ft &Dct·a1fJOelated rmde&r woapoo.• to Canadian buea aa aA -a1enda item 111 lhe US.Cana~ MlAl•terf.al Jola& Comnnuee cm Defo.uo on Juae ZS. It la undot'etood that the aovor~t ot Canada ha• no objecUon to CIJ,u lderatlon ot We Uem at thla time. z
  • tbere m&f ~ time tor careful couWeratloa aa4 ..claloa belu• tn1 mnttag wldl Prim• Mlal•te• Wllaon oa JJecembff 1 aad I. /s/ Lt3J 'l'OP !EGRET December 8, 1964 U. S. Comments on the UK Proposal of a Project for an Atlantic Nuclear Force 1. Preamble
  • that he may come over and pick Uf> Defense 1 s copy as he did the last time. Florence NATIONAL SECURITY. ACTION MEMORANDUM NO. Toi Th• Vice P•••ident The Seoretary of Stat• Tho Sec:t'etl\ry o! Defenae · The. Seca.·etby of Commerce Tbe Chldrm.an. Atomic