Discover Our Collections
Limit your search
Tag- Digital item (4)
- Johnson, W. Thomas, 1941- (2)
- Jones, James R. (2)
- Harriman, W. Averell (William Averell), 1891-1986 (1)
- Roberts, Juanita (1)
- Rostow, W. W. (Walt Whitman), 1916-2003 (1)
- Vance, Cyrus R. (Cyrus Roberts), 1917-2002 (1)
- 1968-09-25 (2)
- 1967-09-13 (1)
- 1967-10-03 (1)
- Arms control and disarmament (4)
- Middle East (4)
- United Nations (4)
- Vietnam (4)
- Africa (2)
- China (2)
- Czechoslovakia (2)
- Nigeria (2)
- Peace negotiations (2)
- Apartheid (1)
- Civil disobedience (1)
- Draft (1)
- Public relations (1)
- Text (4)
- Meeting Notes (4)
- Folder (4)
- Meeting notes (4)
4 results
- , why were they no longer shelled at the Marine site at Conthien. Secretary McNamara said he did not know if this was a result of our action or their decision. The Pre sic.ent asked if we shou1d move our people bad:;:, as ha.s been sugge s·i:e d
- pass. But I don't think it will and they will say it was a rebuff because of our unreasonable and inhumane action in the bombing. On balance, that would be a loss in my judgement. Goldberg said I don't agree. Katzenbach said he agrees with McNamara
- that have so far been willing to criticize Soviet intervention. In determining what actions the Assembly might take concerning Cz echoslovakia, there are at least three perti nent consid erations for the U.S.: what 't\lOuld b·e he lpful to the Czechs, what
Folder, "September 25, 1968 - 12:17 p.m. National Security Council," Papers of Tom Johnson, Box 4
(Item)
- revanchism", Viet-Nam, and the Middle East) and generally will try to place Czech events in a cold war context in hopes of silencing the non aligned countries that have so far been willing to criticize Soviet intervention. In determining what actions