Discover Our Collections


  • Tag > Digital item (remove)
  • Subject > Arms control and disarmament (remove)
  • Subject > United Nations (remove)

6 results

  • 504th RSCMeeting NSC Control No. 94 ------ - 8ECR:6't- NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL RECORD OF ACTIONS NSC Action 2456 Reaulta of 1962 Nuclear Teat Program to Date and Teat• Proposed for Remainder of Program a. Di1cuaaed a draft Department
  • , why were they no longer shelled at the Marine site at Conthien. Secretary McNamara said he did not know if this was a result of our action or their decision. The Pre sic.ent asked if we shou1d move our people bad:;:, as ha.s been sugge s·i:e d
  • pass. But I don't think it will and they will say it was a rebuff because of our unreasonable and inhumane action in the bombing. On balance, that would be a loss in my judgement. Goldberg said I don't agree. Katzenbach said he agrees with McNamara
  • of many delegates and figure heavily in the general debate . . The Soviets and other Conununist delegations are likely to attack our policy and actions, and we think it probable that some non-aligned nations will display concern, ·if not out­ right
  • that have so far been willing to criticize Soviet intervention. In determining what actions the Assembly might take concerning Cz echoslovakia, there are at least three perti­ nent consid erations for the U.S.: what 't\lOuld b·e he lpful to the Czechs, what
  • revanchism", Viet-Nam, and the Middle East) and generally will try to place Czech events in a cold war context in hopes of silencing the non­ aligned countries that have so far been willing to criticize Soviet intervention. In determining what actions