Discover Our Collections


  • Tag > Digital item (remove)
  • Specific Item Type > Folder (remove)
  • Subject > NATO (remove)
  • Collection > National Security Files (remove)

6 results

  • - ,.~Lrv) ID NOYember 1959, howeYel', after these new agreemat• for coopen.tlon had 1one Into effect, the Committee wu lnformallJ adriaed of a plaD whenbJ a U. S. nuclear weapon, the MB-1 (th6''Genie"air•to-air rocket) the nucleai- componBnt, would be mated
  • be leaving the meeting at 1100, we should tum to the heart of the problem, the MLF. Mr. Bates said he would like to discuss problem. this it 1n tact it still is a He said he had Just attended 111eetingsof the NATOParliamentarians in New York
  • , as if to flout De Gaulle, announced it would not purchase French tanks as had been contemplated but would instead procure the new German tank. It is understood the US is pressing the FRG to in­ crease military purchases in the US and has informed Bonn
  • the potential and intention of the recipient country to engage in a national program. No new control mechanisms or formalized inter-agency committees are required, but improved coordination, exchange of views and centralized compilation of case-by-case
  • room (room 7261 New State Bldg.). at The Department of State is currently engaged in preparing its semi-annual inventory of existing and pro­ jected contingency plans. In connection with this task, the views of the Planning Group on possible subjects
  • be required. The Secretary has worked out an agreement wit:4 Minister von Hassel under which our Joint Chiefs will work with the FRG military authorities to make a new joint study of the potential military effectiveness of ADM 1 s. The Secretary 1 s • request