Discover Our Collections


  • Tag > Digital item (remove)
  • Specific Item Type > Folder (remove)
  • Subject > NATO (remove)
  • Collection > National Security Files (remove)

11 results

Folder, "NSAM # 345: Nuclear Planning, 4/22/1966," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 8 (Item)
  • into positions which would endanger the security of our troops, or the integrity of NATO command arrangements; (6) with respect to Allied overflights and French access to Allied com­ munications and intelligence, we should indicate our hope that both can
Folder, "NSAM # 345: Nuclear Planning, 4/22/1966," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 8 (Item)
  • Special Assistant to the President The White House Dear Walt: Would you be kind enough to ex in t he esident that our response to the NSAM 345 Memorandum will be slightly delayedo We are meeting on what I hope is a nearly complete text tomorrowo I expect
Folder, "NATO - US Atomic Information to," Files of Charles E. Johnson, NSF, Box 5 (Item)
Folder, "[NSC Meeting on] Current NATO Issues, 6/19/1968, Volume 5, Tab 70," National Security Council Meetings Files, NSF, Box 2 (Item)
  • . The Ministers will authorize increased surveillance. H< us_, vc;.l .x 1111 1t11:. C bf\!' P~:
Folder, "JCS -- War Games, Vol. 3, 1/65 ‑ 11/65 [1 of 2]," Agency Files, NSF, Box 31 (Item)
  • and pre-game documentation are also in­ cluded in this report. It is hoped that the overall package will be useful to planners and intelligence officers concerned with US policy in this area. The following comments resulted from observations of the Game
Folder, "State Department, Policy Planning, Vol. 5," Agency Files, NSF, Box 52 (Item)
  • of economic policy for which I have more respect than the effort of the Brazilian Government to bring its people out of the inflationary environment in which they have lived so long and which has frustrated the legitimately high hopes and expecta­ tions
Folder, "Multilateral Force - General," Files of Charles E. Johnson, NSF, Box 3 (Item)
  • of achievement by less '!be first possibility is the Special moving 1n November with 8 or possibly Conaittee which we hope to get 9 members. '!he French have opted out of this COIJlllittee, exacting as their price for opting out the promise that 1.4,; ti
Folder, "[NSC Meeting on] NATO, 12/13/1966, Volume 4, Tab 48," National Security Council Meetings Files, NSF, Box 2 (Item)
  • :::-ecious in light of recent Gerr.1&.n pol i tic a l sh i fts ; and 3 ) p oliti c a l influen c e - the NJ'.TO consul tation p.i:'ocess is seen as the best hope of secur­ i ng US attention t o Europe2n interests ~ nd objections . Conseq uently , the Fourteen
Folder, "NSAM # 294: U.S. Nuclear and Strategic Delivery System Assistance to France, 4/20/1964," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 3 (Item)
  • the basis which is suggested i.u the memorandum enclosed with y·o ur letter. My one ackd:aoua.1 Gugg~ation is that I hope a White HO"~;use Staif Officer n~y also be included in the: l\rsA~< Review Group under State chairmanship. I would expect to nominate
Folder, "NUCLEAR - JCAE (Study of U.S. - NATO Nuclear Weapons Arrangement)," Files of Charles E. Johnson, NSF, Box 35 (Item)
Folder, "NATO - 144B," Files of Charles E. Johnson, NSF, Box 4 (Item)