Discover Our Collections


  • Tag > Digital item (remove)
  • Series > National Security Council Histories Files (remove)

57 results

  • #51 was illegible. Using a duplicate o f the document (located in National Security File, Vietnam Country File, “Vietnam, Volume 15,” Box 7, #77), the text o f page 3 was handwritten on a preservation copy. Alexis Percle April 21, 2014 National
  • Vietnam
  • Date Restriction 4/13/65 dup., #54, NSF, Country File, Vietnam, "NODiS-LOR, Volume2A," Box 46 45a memo Intellligence Memo - sanitized 8/98 4/20/65 dup., #198, NSF, Country File, Vietnam, Volume 32, Box 16 Collection Title National Security File
  • See all scanned items from file unit "Deployment of Major U.S. Forces to Vietnam, July 1965: Volume 3"
  • Vietnam
  • Folder, "Deployment of Major U.S. Forces to Vietnam, July 1965, Volume 3, Tabs 141-169," National Security Council Histories, NSF, Box 41
  • a c t o r U N D E R L Y IN G SOV P O S I T I O N I S CONVICTION T H A T I N VIETNAM S I T U A T I O N , U N L I K E .CUBAN C R I S I S , WE ARE ALMOST ALONE among a l l i e s and EVE.N US P U B L I C OPINION S E R I O U S L Y D I V I D E D ; ANY r e
  • See all scanned items from file unit "Deployment of Major U.S. Forces to Vietnam, July 1965: Volume 2"
  • Vietnam
  • Folder, "Deployment of Major U.S. Forces to Vietnam, July 1965, Volume 2, Tabs 88-119," National Security Council Histories, NSF, Box 40
  • See all scanned items from file unit "Deployment of Major U.S. Forces to Vietnam, July 1965: Volume 6"
  • Vietnam
  • Folder, "Deployment of Major U.S. Forces to Vietnam, July 1965, Volume 6, Tabs 357-383," National Security Council Histories, NSF, Box 43
  • E S S R ^ - E ^ ^ U G U S T 5 ON V IE T NAM S ITU A TIO N . ^ QUOTE ON TH E SECOND AUGUST TH R E E NORTH VIETNAM ESE f*1^ST PATROL, BOATS Ca r r i e d o u t a t o r p e d o a t t a c k a g a in s t t h e u n i t e -d ' ^ t a t e s DESTROYER "MADDOX
  • Vietnam
  • See all scanned items from file unit "Deployment of Major U.S. Forces to Vietnam, July 1965: Volume 1"
  • Vietnam
  • Folder, "Deployment of Major U.S. Forces to Vietnam, July 1965, Volume 1, Tabs 11-41," National Security Council Histories, NSF, Box 40
  • 4 / - 2 QUESTION: VJas t h e U.S. a c t i o n i n destroyin.g; N o rth Vietnam ase b o a ts and h a rb o r i n s t a l l a t i o n s l e g a l ? / / / ANSWER; (1) The armed a t t a c k upon our v e s s e l s p a t r o l l i n g th e h ig h .s
  • Vietnam
  • Date TS 1 [2/10/65] TS 3 [2/10/65] Restriction dup., #5a NSF, Country File, Vietnam, "Volume 28," Box 13 71 cable CINCPAC 050305Z dup., #5, NSF, Country File, Vietnam, "Volume 28," Box 13 86 memo to McGeorge Bundy - sanitized, 5/98 2/12
  • See all scanned items from file unit "Deployment of Major U.S. Forces to Vietnam, July 1965: Volume 1"
  • Vietnam
  • Folder, "Deployment of Major U.S. Forces to Vietnam, July 1965, Volume 1, Tabs 1-10," National Security Council Histories, NSF, Box 40
  • - sanitized per RAC 8/00 Date Restriction 0 A dup. #156, NSF, Country File, Vietnam, "Volume 37," Box 19 Collection Title Natiional Security File, NSC Histories Folder Title "Deployment of Major U.S. Forces to Vietnam, July 1965, Volume 7" Box Number 43
  • See all scanned items from file unit "Deployment of Major U.S. Forces to Vietnam, July 1965: Volume 7"
  • Vietnam
  • Folder, "Deployment of Major U.S. Forces to Vietnam, July 1965, Volume 7, Tabs 401-420," National Security Council Histories, NSF, Box 43
  • en sio n t h a t th e p o s s i b i l i t y o f s te a d y U .S. e s c a l a t i o n o f h o s t i l i t i e s a g a in s t N orth Vietnam was s u f f i c i e n t l y s e r io u s t o demand a n t i c i p a t o r y a c t- o n a t th e l e v e l o f p
  • Vietnam
  • out the dangers of US military aid to India. You interrupted Ahmed ' s presentation to ask whether this explained Ayub 1 s silence on requests for help in Vietnam, which had 11 shocked you. 11 After an exchange on Ayub 1 s statement that he might have
  • of America. The determination of all Americans to carry out our full commitment to the peo­ ple and to the government of South VietNam will be redoubled by this outrage. Yet our response, for the present, will be limited and fitting. W e Americans know
  • Vietnam