Skip to main content
-
Tag >
Digital item
(remove)
-
Series >
National Security Council Histories Files
(remove)
Limit your search
Tag
Date
Subject
Type
Collection
Series
Specific Item Type
Time Period
57 results
- #51 was illegible. Using a
duplicate o f the document (located in National Security File, Vietnam Country File, “Vietnam,
Volume 15,” Box 7, #77), the text o f page 3 was handwritten on a preservation copy.
Alexis Percle
April 21, 2014
National
- Vietnam
-
Date
Restriction
4/13/65
dup., #54, NSF, Country File, Vietnam,
"NODiS-LOR, Volume2A," Box 46
45a
memo
Intellligence Memo - sanitized 8/98
4/20/65
dup., #198, NSF, Country File, Vietnam,
Volume 32, Box 16
Collection Title National Security File
- See all scanned items from file unit "Deployment of Major U.S. Forces to Vietnam, July 1965: Volume 3"
- Vietnam
- Folder, "Deployment of Major U.S. Forces to Vietnam, July 1965, Volume 3, Tabs 141-169," National Security Council Histories, NSF, Box 41
- a c t o r U N D E R L Y IN G SOV P O S I T I O N I S CONVICTION T H A T I N
VIETNAM S I T U A T I O N , U N L I K E .CUBAN C R I S I S , WE ARE ALMOST ALONE
among a l l i e s
and EVE.N US P U B L I C OPINION S E R I O U S L Y D I V I D E D ;
ANY r e
- See all scanned items from file unit "Deployment of Major U.S. Forces to Vietnam, July 1965: Volume 2"
- Vietnam
- Folder, "Deployment of Major U.S. Forces to Vietnam, July 1965, Volume 2, Tabs 88-119," National Security Council Histories, NSF, Box 40
- See all scanned items from file unit "Deployment of Major U.S. Forces to Vietnam, July 1965: Volume 6"
- Vietnam
- Folder, "Deployment of Major U.S. Forces to Vietnam, July 1965, Volume 6, Tabs 357-383," National Security Council Histories, NSF, Box 43
- E S S R ^ - E ^ ^ U G U S T 5
ON V IE T NAM S ITU A TIO N .
^
QUOTE
ON TH E SECOND AUGUST TH R E E NORTH VIETNAM ESE f*1^ST PATROL,
BOATS Ca r r i e d o u t a t o r p e d o a t t a c k a g a in s t t h e u n i t e -d ' ^ t a t e s
DESTROYER "MADDOX
- Vietnam
- See all scanned items from file unit "Deployment of Major U.S. Forces to Vietnam, July 1965: Volume 1"
- Vietnam
- Folder, "Deployment of Major U.S. Forces to Vietnam, July 1965, Volume 1, Tabs 11-41," National Security Council Histories, NSF, Box 40
-
4
/
- 2 QUESTION:
VJas t h e U.S. a c t i o n i n destroyin.g; N o rth Vietnam ase b o a ts
and h a rb o r i n s t a l l a t i o n s l e g a l ?
/
/
/
ANSWER;
(1) The armed a t t a c k upon our v e s s e l s p a t r o l l i n g th e h ig h
.s
- Vietnam
-
Date
TS
1
[2/10/65]
TS
3
[2/10/65]
Restriction
dup., #5a NSF, Country File, Vietnam, "Volume
28," Box 13
71
cable
CINCPAC 050305Z
dup., #5, NSF, Country File, Vietnam, "Volume
28," Box 13
86
memo
to McGeorge Bundy - sanitized, 5/98
2/12
- See all scanned items from file unit "Deployment of Major U.S. Forces to Vietnam, July 1965: Volume 1"
- Vietnam
- Folder, "Deployment of Major U.S. Forces to Vietnam, July 1965, Volume 1, Tabs 1-10," National Security Council Histories, NSF, Box 40
- - sanitized per
RAC 8/00
Date
Restriction
0
A
dup. #156, NSF, Country File, Vietnam,
"Volume 37," Box 19
Collection Title Natiional Security File, NSC Histories
Folder Title
"Deployment of Major U.S. Forces to Vietnam, July 1965, Volume 7"
Box Number
43
- See all scanned items from file unit "Deployment of Major U.S. Forces to Vietnam, July 1965: Volume 7"
- Vietnam
- Folder, "Deployment of Major U.S. Forces to Vietnam, July 1965, Volume 7, Tabs 401-420," National Security Council Histories, NSF, Box 43
- en sio n t h a t th e p o s s i b i l i t y o f
s te a d y U .S. e s c a l a t i o n o f h o s t i l i t i e s a g a in s t N orth Vietnam was s u f f i c i e n t l y
s e r io u s t o demand a n t i c i p a t o r y a c t- o n a t th e l e v e l o f p
- Vietnam
- out the dangers of US military aid to India. You interrupted
Ahmed ' s presentation to ask whether this explained Ayub 1 s silence on
requests for help in Vietnam, which had 11 shocked you. 11 After an exchange
on Ayub 1 s statement that he might have
- of America.
The determination of all Americans to
carry out our full commitment to the peo
ple and to the government of South VietNam will be redoubled by this outrage. Yet
our response, for the present, will be limited
and fitting. W e Americans know
- Vietnam