Discover Our Collections


  • Tag > Digital item (remove)
  • Series > National Security Action Memorandums (remove)
  • Subject > Outer space (remove)

5 results

Folder, "NSAM # 285: Cooperation with the USSR on Outer Space Matters, 3/3/1964," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 3 (Item)
  • to test the Soviets 1 intentions by further conversation. If, however, the next round of conversation is fruitless, NASA should be requested to develop some specific action proposal that would represent a new initiative on our part. At the last meeting
Folder, "NSAM # 271: Cooperation with the USSR on Outer Space Matters, 11/12/1963," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 2 (Item)
  • response to the proposals for cooperation already made by President Kennedy and by you. (b) No new high-level US initiative is recommended until the Soviet Union . has had a fur-ther opportunity (possibly ·t hree months) to discharge its current obligations
Folder, "NSAM # 300: Review of Alternative Communications, Navigation, Missile and Space Tracking and Data Acquisition Facilities, 5/19/1964," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 4 (Item)
  • Chile plus Peru and/or Ecuador are denied. i. Establish two new stations, one in Hawaii, and one in either Fiji Islands or American Samoa. A mobile station for special equatorial coverage would possibly be required. 2. Cost: Approximately $14.ooo
Folder, "NSAM # 50: Official Announcement of Launching Into Space of Systems Involving Nuclear Power in any Form [Revised], 4/10/1965," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 1 (Item)
  • in connection with the orbiting and testing of nuclear devices in space. This new draft would replace the old NSAM No. 50 which had been originally issued in connection with orbiting TRANSIT satellites in 1961.- It has been checked out with ·t he responsible
Folder, "NSAM # 354: U.S. Cooperation with European Launcher Development Organization (ELDO), 7/29/1966," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 9 (Item)
  • which they are willing to support. This has the effect of withholding specific Presidential approval of every single detailed item of the long statement. I believe, however, that the new form will have the same value as the long one without