Discover Our Collections


  • Tag > Digital item (remove)
  • Series > National Security Action Memorandums (remove)
  • Subject > Nuclear weapons (remove)

4 results

Folder, "NSAM # 345: Nuclear Planning, 4/22/1966," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 8 (Item)
  • into positions which would endanger the security of our troops, or the integrity of NATO command arrangements; (6) with respect to Allied overflights and French access to Allied com­ munications and intelligence, we should indicate our hope that both can
Folder, "NSAM # 345: Nuclear Planning, 4/22/1966," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 8 (Item)
  • Special Assistant to the President The White House Dear Walt: Would you be kind enough to ex in t he esident that our response to the NSAM 345 Memorandum will be slightly delayedo We are meeting on what I hope is a nearly complete text tomorrowo I expect
Folder, "NSAM # 321: Review of Strategic Stockpile Objectives, 12/1/1964," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 6 (Item)
  • in anticipation of eventual Presidential approval of the new guidance. Bennewitz in Defense also told me yesterday that they were hoping the NSAM could be issued shortly because the new guidance will have considerable impact on our approach to stockpiling. I think
Folder, "NSAM # 322: Guidelines for Discussions on the Nuclear Defense of the Atlantic Alliance, 12/17/1964," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 6 (Item)
  • in the gears, however, ve could probably increase the prospects of a meaningf'ul. exchange between Wilson and Erhard. Thia could be done by advising both the Dr1t1sh e.nd the Germans, before that meeting takes place, that we hope it can be followed up