Discover Our Collections
Limit your search
Tag- Digital item (19)
- 1964-04-20 (2)
- 1964-05-05 (2)
- 1964-05-19 (2)
- 1964-05-22 (2)
- 1964-11-14 (2)
- 1964-02-13 (1)
- 1964-03-14 (1)
- 1964-03-19 (1)
- 1964-07-10 (1)
- 1964-11-12 (1)
- 1964-12-01 (1)
- 1966-05-30 (1)
- 1967-01-13 (1)
- 1967-01-26 (1)
- Defense (19)
- Korea (2)
- NATO (2)
- Western Europe (2)
- Canada (1)
- Cuba (1)
- Intelligence (1)
- Military personnel (1)
- Nuclear weapons (1)
- Outer space (1)
- Pakistan (1)
- South Asia (1)
- Telecommunication systems (1)
- Text (19)
- Folder (15)
- Memorandum (4)
19 results
- to incorporate your de sired changes. I have . reduced the time span covered in the preliminary notification from two years to one year, and have asked that a new schedule be supplied each quarter, instead of merely requesting monthly corrections to the original
- organizations, either directly or through third parties, which would be reasonably likely to facilitate these efforts by significantly affecting timing, quality or costs or would identify the U.S. as a major supplier or collaborator. However
Memorandum # 298, Study of Possible Redeployment of U.S. Division Now Stationed in Korea, 5/5/1964
(Item)
- of our intentions in Japan, Southeast Asia, Europe--and in Russia and Communist China, and (b) to expTh.in the good sense of the move to the Congress and the U.S. public. 6. As regards timing, I should like two alternatives to be ex plored: one
- has no objection to consideration of this item at this time. z. The prohibition against initiating discussion of this subject with Canada contained in NSAM Z48 of June 3, 1963, is accordingly withdrawn. . DECIASmlED 1.0. 12356, Sec. 39' ~ 9.1·S~J
- continue to be valid, i.e., that it remains in the U.S. interest to develop alternatives to U.So facilities in Pakistan and that measures toward that end are feasible. 2o The passage of time, however, has necessitated certain changes in specific
- . Division Now Stationed in Korea Attached pursuant to your request in NSAM No. 298 is a coordinated State-AID-Defense study or a possible redeployment of' one or the two U.S. divisions now stationed in Korea. Appended to the study is a time-phased plan f'or
- , and agrees that it is not feasible to have such plans to cover every case. At the same time, the report leaves unanswered a number of questions. There is enclosed herewith a copy of the principal comments of the representative of the Department of State
- of ·this month so that there ·may be time for careful consideration and decision before my meeting with Prime Minister Wilson on December 7 and 8. • " SECBE'iE' .,.
- &ft &Dct·a1fJOelated rmde&r woapoo.• to Canadian buea aa aA -a1enda item 111 lhe US.Cana~ MlAl•terf.al Jola& Comnnuee cm Defo.uo on Juae ZS. It la undot'etood that the aovor~t ot Canada ha• no objecUon to CIJ,u lderatlon ot We Uem at thla time. z
- tbere m&f ~ time tor careful couWeratloa aa4 ..claloa belu• tn1 mnttag wldl Prim• Mlal•te• Wllaon oa JJecembff 1 aad I. /s/ Lt3J 'l'OP !EGRET December 8, 1964 U. S. Comments on the UK Proposal of a Project for an Atlantic Nuclear Force 1. Preamble
- at this time, but a tentative .recommendation is included in the attachment. In the Near East, the only NASA stat1on concerned is the SAO Baker• . Nunn camera at Naini-Tal, India. In the event it would have to be ·.moved, NASA would propose to move it to one
- judgment on the following: a. The technical, economic, quality, and timing importance of the item to the national weapons program. b. The use actually intended for the item. c. The alternative sources outside the u.s. for the item or a comparable
- purposes will not be adopted at this time. · I 2. Limited war stockpile objectives will be based upon: a. estimated essential shortages during a two-year emergency period {as opposed to the present three-year planning period), and b. the assumption
- time for adequate prepara tions. Since, in the Embassy's view, the government was likely to keep the matter confidential this per mission was granted. A request by Embassy Nairobi to inform on a confidential basis senior British officers serving
- that he may come over and pick Uf> Defense 1 s copy as he did the last time. Florence NATIONAL SECURITY. ACTION MEMORANDUM NO. Toi Th• Vice P•••ident The Seoretary of Stat• Tho Sec:t'etl\ry o! Defenae · The. Seca.·etby of Commerce Tbe Chldrm.an. Atomic
- ?. Or can't they? What about response time? Cloud coverage? Another problem is satellite coverage of Cuba as it might affect satellite coverage in other areas (e.g. Soviet Union, China). Then there is the matter of cost. A satellite launching costs between $8
- bases to isolated dispersal and deployment airfields to insure their survivability and to place forces in areas where they can best meet the developing threat. The proposed release procedure would permit the timely response which is essential
- handled these requests for assigning a DX priority to two Department of Defense procurement programs. I believe the memorandum for the President is self-explanatory. Some time ago I used to handle some of these DX priority requests and on the basis of my
- House, this would be an inopportune time to effect any changes to a NASM. It would be better to defer revisions of NASM 283 until after new staff has taken over. In the interim, the SIG will issue necessary instructions. Revised wording to be developed