Discover Our Collections
Limit your search
Tag- Digital item (13)
- Johnson, W. Thomas, 1941- (8)
- Christian, George E. (George Eastland), 1927-2002 (3)
- Fleming, Bob (2)
- Hackler, Loyd, 1926-1996 (1)
- Jones, James R. (1)
- Maguire, Charles Martin, 1930-2009 (1)
- Okun, Arthur M., 1928-1980 (1)
- Robert, Juanita (1)
- 1968-10-14 (2)
- 1968-10-29 (2)
- 1967-07-xx (1)
- 1967-08-xx (1)
- 1967-09-xx (1)
- 1967-10-xx (1)
- 1968-04-xx (1)
- 1968-05-xx (1)
- 1968-06-26 (1)
- 1968-09-12 (1)
- 1968-09-25 (1)
- 1968-10-25 (1)
- 1968-10-28 (1)
- Elections - 1968 Presidential (13)
- Vietnam (12)
- Peace negotiations (6)
- Nixon, Richard M. (Richard Milhous), 1913-1994 (4)
- 1968 transition (3)
- Presidency (3)
- Public relations (3)
- Urban affairs (3)
- Civil disorders (2)
- Press relations (2)
- Taxes (2)
- Australia (1)
- Ball, George W. (George Wildman), 1909-1994 (1)
- Berlin (Germany) (1)
- Business (1)
- Text (13)
- Meeting Notes (13)
- Folder (13)
- Meeting notes (13)
13 results
- available to the press. He read the papers, he said, and noted that Gov. fttnney had explained his Vietnam views by saying he 1d been "brain-washed" in Saigon. 'lhe President observed that an;y man "brain-washed" by diplomats and generals might have problems
- Vietnam
- . The President: Summarize it. Secretary Rusk: Recommend you wait to hear from Bunker. I take the long view. President Kennedy said we would make a battle there to save South Vietnam. That set us on course. After the Tonkin Gulf, you put in troops to keep South
- Vietnam
- I" / April 26, 1968 NOTES FROM THE PRESIDENT'S MEETING WITH MUTUAL BROADCASTING COMPANY EXECUTIVES October 2, 196, Points made by the President on Vietnam: 1. Defending Vietnam is important to the security of this country
- Vietnam
- . It will be a setback for our re~ationship. It's a shame. Today a Soviet diplomat told a Frenchman after Vietnam, we could move to settlement on the basis of 19&2 accords. 2. . . ·.· ·,, · ~ Go back and insist upon the 2nd. 3. Meet on the 4th -- look as though we
- Vietnam
- asked for the President 1 s . views of comments on the Hill that were critical of the Thieu-Ky attitude toward the South Vietnam elections. The President said some mistakes were being made, but that we might be surprised there were not more. Even in our
- Vietnam
- countries, trade, security matters, or helping build a stable peace. Question: Does the President think there is a serious possibility of productive talks taking place with Ho Chi Minh leading to a peaceful settlement in Vietnam.? Answer: We simply do
- Vietnam
- during lunch on the status of the Paris talks today. The President: Fine, let's go on. Walt Rostow: Ambassador Bunker has a good report on Vietnam. shows action in land reform and other areas. The President: Huong has a good image with our press. before
- Vietnam
Folder, "October 14, 1968 Meeting with Foreign Policy Advisory Group," Papers of Tom Johnson, Box 4
(Item)
- : What do you think of Abrams views? General Wheeler: I agree with Abrams' views. The President: Do you anticipate problems if we stop bombing if they include the Government of South Vietnam at the Conference Table, assuming we believe they will A. Stop
- Vietnam
- . SECRETARY RUSK: Let's amend the GVN so that South Vietnam are at the table the next day. THE PRESIDENT: Are we all in agreement that we should stop the bombing if the GVN are there? If the GVN are not there do we resume the bombing? SECRETARY RUSK: Yes
- Vietnam
- Secretary Clifford: I would not put in the line about recognition of the parties. Secretary Rusk: South Vietnam is concerned about our recognizing the NLF. The President: We imply recognition. We'll have a hard time explaining this between now
- Vietnam
- of the southern boundary of the DMZ"; this language could be inserted. THE PRESIDENT: What do we do if he comes across the DMZ? GENERAL WHEELER: THE PRESIDENT: out of the DMZ? He has immediate authority to respond. Do you assume that North Vietnam
- Vietnam
- of the post-Vietnam defense outlook mentioning the $60 billion ,,,, ,.,. ....,..,.,.-.. - 2 benchmark figures, but indicating he regarded it as a lower limit. (He must have had a good memo or briefing on that recently from DOD.) We had to remain first