Discover Our Collections
Limit your search
Tag- Digital item (19)
- new2024-Mar (19)
- Nuclear weapons (12)
- Outer space (4)
- Arms control and disarmament (3)
- India (3)
- NATO (3)
- China (1)
- Defense (1)
- France (1)
- Japan (1)
- Ocean floor (1)
- Text (19)
- Folder (19)
19 results
- who bas sp nt so y y in th field that probably preoccupi s of WI vi ha grea er uni 1 ty ban hat is he field of dis nt- .ls ion isiting th the elc f r ion for th plor as ron ut Aaaembly this ing. and gftUl~-•nt and r spect ordinary acbi«v1mK"1nt n
- .......................... Section I. II. WHATSHOULD THE FORCEDETER? ................ III. AVOIDINGANOTHER WAROF 'lllE KIND ONE HAS KOOWN •..•..••... IV. V. VI. PARTII. 11 o • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 16 HOWSHOULDTHE FORCEBE USEDIN WAR?........ 23 nIE TRIGGER
- hoost when then Secretary of the taken place: ,cientisls now know that is to be capable of locating and recov Navy Paul Nitze estahlished the post n11imal11and men are able lo exist for of Office of the Oceanographer of the ering small objects
Folder, "NUCLEAR - Indian Nuclear Problem [1 of 2]," Files of Charles E. Johnson, NSF, Box 33
(Item)
- capability may be pertinent. These concerns relate importantly to Indi~'s ~ - 6 to India's future position vis-a-vis Communist China in Asia, and to whether an effort to "go it alone" militarily (including nuclear as well) will come to be regarded
Folder, "NUCLEAR - Indian Nuclear Problem [2 of 2]," Files of Charles E. Johnson, NSF, Box 33
(Item)
- • • • . . • • • • Nuclear Sharing. • , . • • . • • • • (vi) The Plowshare Loophole . . • • . . • • • • 4. Conclusion. 5. Recommendation .. NLJ .....• • ...• of an Indian DECLASSIFIED E.O. 13292, Sec. 3.5 By • . . . . . . . . . . . . . ott- , , a_
- · States_ may, however, com• municate such information to the North Atlantic Treaty Orga,nization or, 3 when authorized by the United States, to other Member States the information for functions related to NATO missions~ requiring Article VI provides
- TECHNOLOGYCONSISTENT WitH tNTtLSAT ARRANGEMENT~,WE WILL BE IN POSITION TO HOvr AH£An VtS•••VIS NSAM 338 ON GOVfRNMENT,AND LATER ON AGENCy AND INDUSTRY LEVELS AS APPROPRIATE• ACTION ON PROPOSALS INVOLVING NSAM 29~ wr.uLo BE UNOERTA~ENroLL"WING APPROP~IATE AGR~EM~NTAS
- THIS VIEWWITHABOVESTATEMENT.IT IS MYFEELINGa PARTICULARLY IN VIEW OF EXCHANGE Of IDEASTHATTOOKPLACE DURINGRUSKfSVISIT ANDPROBABILITY Of U.K. ENTRYINTO COMMON MARKET THATWERE-EXAMINE OUR-PRESENT NUCLEAR SITUATIONVIS-A-VIS THE SIX NATIONSANDNATOUSINGCURRENT DISCUSSIONOF MRBM•SIN
- Party to this Treaty so desiring may, pursuant to a special agreement or agreements, obtain any such benefits on a bilateral basis or through an appropriate international body with adequate representation of non-nuclear-weapon States. f ARTICLE VI Each
- and subassemblies being considered here and to attain a reasonable production rates- ma.n.n.0unced spot checks of facilities subsequent to th-e ir~itial !.'1$pe ....tion should be adequate. 7. Undeclared Production Inspection teams wou.ld vis:1t, in accordance
- :..:.:E::..:L=-:A...:..::T::.:E::..::D:.__:U:..:::N.:..:..P~~G;:_:,R...:.::E _____ _ REPORTING U.S. ltarctic . S. Tre~ty.Art. Draft Treaty 'SR W. P. No. 4. 4. ;. . Treaty Art. 4 A State III Art. Draft conducting acti vi ti,_. o: celest;ial
- das1.NC- Ucn 1n orbit arul that. o\Q" Pd U i.an, aeti v1 t1co in epacie an not •~ivv and are, tbm-e!ont, peaoeful with\n tt.. ~ ot the uuted ••tie>M ~ c>4 eatU'll~ omHda'-mt. with UN reeolutlona dia411ng vi th ~ lltibject. 9-•t. re~ i I01 OtlP,010.f
- be bcereattld 1D • ~-; -::::.: ~:::!:::-::~:!'.93 c:-..::::,ltl c:! 01:= .:~;,~::10:1 u:::_.: ~:... ~::::.:.,:i t.:> t.::!~=~~~ •~Q::ly. ,::.:..~i:as vith ?r::r.ca do vi~ ~ cu,ply of tcee Wo:r=:, of U•233 ~~ich t~o !::~ h--vc :c~~~tccl to~ uoa