Discover Our Collections


  • Tag > Digital item (remove)
  • Series > Files of Charles E. Johnson (remove)
  • Subject > Nuclear weapons (remove)

17 results

  • . 3/19/2009 ---- Initials - THE NEW YORK TIMES, 'Pf[URSDAY, JANUARY 4, 1968 China', Late,t At~m.. Teat I• -Believed a Failure . ~ IIY JORNW. FINNEY -.i .. '1'1111..., Tenll'lmle WASRINGTON,Jan. :f-Pre- '· ,. UJ. lfetn • Ducr,,-c1 off
  • of the That Section 24 of the of America in Congress assembled, Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, is amended by adding a new sub­ section "d. d. as follows: an Assistant who shall General l-Bnager for Military be an active commissioned officer and who
  • QUOTE1n the of our news in Genevao UNQUOTE lOo Para 13, second sentence. range would include with strategic in the freeze bomberse 11. Para 14. 12. Para 15, third primary mission 13. Also we have defined vehicles Delete last Add follo
  • the uranium waa needed "is ,' · , ,the same no matter what kind I n.f_Allhm.AJ!ln.• .VIOJLftnt..J.t. t .. " •• NEW YORK, SUNDAY, APRIL 17, 1966. ATOR1DENIED FUEL TOPARIS· SINCE '64 DESPITE U.S.PACT: ActionApparentlyintended to Penalizethe French
  • - ,.~Lrv) ID NOYember 1959, howeYel', after these new agreemat• for coopen.tlon had 1one Into effect, the Committee wu lnformallJ adriaed of a plaD whenbJ a U. S. nuclear weapon, the MB-1 (th6''Genie"air•to-air rocket) the nucleai- componBnt, would be mated
  • ", Box 33] o~n Lt/l&/12 OS an9ram New Delhi A-9 70 c- ~ 4f~9f66 94 A'l8A'l9 G. .IORR68R &oReeten s 2 5~~88 05 memo Keeny to Rostow s 1 4/29/66 A Optn 'lbO/tSptt R,l'tC'11~ opU1 q/1'5/ll ijt;S oq-1&.1-e I\- i-7 ,fl,,. [Sanitized per
  • the atudy of to ■peed tb1 ■ problem. the •tudy of tho Indian nuclea~ problem au Mid be wow.cl laaue a NSAM ahortly. PRESERVATION COPY ~/DRAFT June•• 1966 MEMORANDUM FOR THI: PR.E;IDENT We picked the Indian nucleu in your new ••ri••of meettaa
  • only 5% to 15% of the capability of this new machine. Therefore it seems to me our denial would be effective to forestall a significant contribution to French nuclear warhead and delivery capabilities. Accordingly, I would propose IBM not be authorized
  • to be much less and perhaps to satisfy interests. At a later of death," and of the new force policy France's the military probably and military engage in lobbying, successors for a French and will full not have This feeling difficult need
  • Treaty, ln:;l.1!11tlonof thing which cnn be relied upan ·for U1e •. Absent this option natior,~ such as ,;~· •..··the ..hc,thnc-;· r..new Ontcr Spacr! Trcnty, heavy purpose of polichl% this treaty i.1 .Indln and Japan, !or e:,n.;nple. !acerl ,,,·ith
  • . Has not the French govemmer.: Commerce. There were C.T.V. news reports noUfled· Canada that it will not accept U:e over the week end which indicated that France principle of inspection; and is lt not a fac: had rejected Canadian control but that 1he
  • of gill Page2 LBJ LIBRARY DOCUMENT WITHDRAWAL SHEET Doc# DocType Doc Info ,OSIG .Q'.ll "IAelex" Classification ~8·2--\~ Pages Date Restriction s 13 [e/661 A NL){y\•\~ 10b cable Deptel 2296 to New Delhi s 5 5/24/66 A 10e draft
  • , New Menco ALBERT GORE, TennTHOMAS 0. MORRIS, New Mm.co HENRY M. JACKSON, Wuhlncton JOHN YOUNG, Tena BOURKE B. HIOKENLOOPER, Iowa ORAIO HOSMER, Califomla GEORGE D, ALKEN, Vennonl WILLIAM H. BATES, Muucbu11ettl WALLACE I'. BENNETT, Utah JOHN B. ANDERSON
  • be continuously evaluated in terms of both the potential end intention of the recipient country to engage in n mrtional program. 7. Mo new control mechanisms or formalized inter-llecncy committee:i i,ra required, but improved coorclinntion, cr.chnnna of views
  • be required. The Secretary has worked out an agreement wit:4 Minister von Hassel under which our Joint Chiefs will work with the FRG military authorities to make a new joint study of the potential military effectiveness of ADM 1 s. The Secretary 1 s • request
  • • we )lave ,-tten. Ual• ••• aot •w-ar to M the ca••• Tber.lore. 11111•••aomeou can ••tabUah tut tbl• lan•t ao. or that the Fr•adl p1aa to••• it on a new Muaa• W-1' da&t ba• •tnteatc: Y&bae. da•r• would •••m lo be little maAMI-W.l'laa ll'OUd I.or u here
  • ~tta.l'~iN: Vi~ .THE POLICY Of T_HE_UNITEDSTATtS.• -~)-~'--.1-_, . .'. . . . "1 WAS PRESENT AT THE .eACKGR()JNC)SR1tr1~ .r:uR NEW YORK: • M~N, NG T!--ilT NOT IN ACCORD\✓ I"'." ••• ,, . . \.'HtCHMR. RAYMONDc, ir __ AS THE SOURCE FOR HIS STORY