Discover Our Collections


  • Tag > Digital item (remove)
  • Series > Files of Charles E. Johnson (remove)
  • Specific Item Type > Folder (remove)

23 results

  • errectl\·.?·· defen;;e c.,tabhsh­ ment ever :itna\\"~ ~> m·,:1: Til'.? try_ !ca­ gotl::'.tcd nnd concluded -.nth the Inter·national Atomic Ener;y Aiiency" e.nd ture o! Uu:i dcc1s10•,m.,kmg tccl 1s 3 n that such D()~otiaUons commence within examination or e
  • of' the Atomic Energy Act. what Congressman Holifield for details some time lO If., for example., we have megatons here? Mr. Holifield asked if there would be any- objection to saying that we have (say) 6,000 weapons in Europe, and no one raised any
  • information to foreign governments. He understood that a group in Defense was also engaged in such a re-examination. Mr. Parrott noted that one State proposal would appear to put the USIB in the position of inspector general, charging it with preparing damage
  • ._,.,.. Jela&ieUel' .. me el May II, 1964. ,- n--m•••• ... a propo•ecl MW NATO 1.a Alffemnt Nhreea Ille Ooffnn 1 t el llaie Um_. ---• el. America_. all.._. member --• el tlrie Nutla .•tl•etl• Treaty Oe•nt• ...... ,_ coeperaeloa ~ lo ._ 1 ■ 1ts•·• ol atendc
  • coatrilMator lo tbe We•n ..._ of Ua.e armr ..,x1 •. U:CUT DECLASSIFIED E.O 1,:,,::n, Sec. 3.4 Ei'.4.a,J~. NARA, D3to~-/~ .. - .,, ~-OUTGOING TELEGRAM Department ~ATE, OCOWCI . ~~w ~ of ·state I . • ' '\ 'SECRET '\ 53 1 °' f I~ ,..,, DAC
  • Arrangementlooooooooooooooo••··········· 29 39 JOINT COMMITTEEON ATOMIC ENERGY TOP SECRET­ oocuMENrNO... ~_e,..,.O __ ~I....__________ 11.L~ TABLE OF CONTENTS lo INTRODUCTION Ao Purpoae al Inapectlon lo General o "o o o o o o. o "o o o o o o o ,, o o o o o o o o o
  • and searching counsel. of their - ~ PkESS RELEASE Jumary The Preelclent met today wUb hi• Committee 21, 1965 on Nucl•ar Pr lU•rati.oa. !leaded by Mr. :aoaw.U Ollp&tric, aad received an AO\U'• lo report ef after noon. were &he ten aember• of all
  • • b11.-,.1. :1• J'Ol11aow. aa ~ Jl&'OIRIII to dnelop tba teahnolo.,. amt tho toOaaic1u ,a nqalnd lo --S 'Widl JrioatUe 1acH1111 •..Wtea-tac die capabWty to d•! ,:ro, tbem-•Anl4_ncia a tbNat .... .,.117 pnND& i&a.U. I&. '11• cu. clemOllatn.te C.t OU u.u
  • to day i.Qple:JOnta~ioD G/PM:OOrwicksfeaa 1n tho on.._oi.nq ~ aetiona ..... •- iii&fl u iiS T: ...... 11111_ .. .,r'IIG'l•ttl!lO •-Nr .. ,... SiiaMil• DF.a.ASSIFIED - • ~J-D?o'?-~ ll,:C.1>. NARA,Date~ 11 lneJDO .:.0:::1:r.J~ ~;;.;.c
  • nxport to France of any material,·equipment, to be used in devising,· ' t~st or evaluating or information any sort of nuclear ' as lo~g as the French contemplate prohibited by th.e Treaty. of "significant" some direct II. conducting, February
  • . to protect accordance the atomic information released with the 1964 Agreement and its Recipients will be required under this determination in supporting Annexes. When se;,o.ratcd trom inclosures hand lo this documont as EXCLU~ED ?HO!! l\!JT0:4/\TIC
  • problemo refer anc:1 ~ -,C representa­ Dept in New York which to l, on ad & const! ute At conclusioa points to mutually meeting, respective govern- ments: lo Within 60 days US will enriched uranium necessary Further, US will give
  • believe that this change reflects a serious examination during the past few weeks of alternatives open to the GOI and particularly since Dharma Vira' s previous remarks on the subject (see A-805, March 4, 1966). He added that the High Commission believes
  • -.. ~ : :"'. par­ ticularly like to ! - c· :1 L...· . -~ • .: , -: ·. Riebmond , Jr . of your stnff --Ol~ hi:-- ~ s sorv:Lco. ~ incerely ··. yours , . ~'!GNfD. Lo... ~ J •· Ii..'\WOl""th Director· cc: Mr. Hof f Mr. Ohl ke Mr. Bolton O/D: D
  • examined. rent for of current out of which the American departs, Continuation for granted. with talking this intellectual of the present The political and learning about nuclear strategy proficiency will will opponents are at best
  • national p progr po ding th nat wit o t other 0 s programs ons programs are orian.1:eo. t e in th first ha .rmtamet uch cooperation t ituations which ould ot o hrough accid or mi cal 1 OU lo 1 p el ~ p t i OU· n sp programs Man's p .ac duct of d
  • out to be true, it's conceivable that they could achieve an initial operational capability during the next year, 1968.. 2. Some years ago we ourselves examined the desirability of the FOBS system, and there was agreement among civilian and military
  • . iEOMiil lo Jovemb r 2, 1965 Dear Hae, Control Aa to our telephone temporary proareas report (from tract fora puter thia. Data conversation onlyt yesterday, this i• a so .. how or other our contract.people 1ot inatructiona Co111Mrce?) to make
  • research paper are self-explanatory. We would appreciate it it you could have the NSC tiles examined to ascertain whether there is a memorandum to or from President Eisenhower (presumably sometime in the latter part or.1958) describing the functions
  • external aid and levels of Indian military expenditure. -- We are seeking to negotiate arms control proposals, including a non-proliferation agreement, and we are examining new proposals, notably a threshold test ban. -- We are exploring assurances
  • it is in the U.S. interest to go in meeting Indian security concerns, what form such action might take, and what the optimum timing might be. -- Whether there are other approaches problem whtch need to be pursued. to the B. Basic Considerations 1. In examining