Discover Our Collections


  • Tag > Digital item (remove)
  • Series > Files of Charles E. Johnson (remove)
  • Collection > National Security Files (remove)

28 results

  • be necessary. 3. We should avoid direct threats that we would cut back (or eliminate) economic aid in the event of a pro­ nuclear decision. However, if India's leaders should ask us what our reaction woµld be, we should consider expressing the view that we
  • ..... ,.. .... ef lta _, ladla Jau --•• la eacb cu• We baYe t. declcle MW c:Wc•. ... •--• It ••:aid N wonla ._ •••• 1. ladla c...W Mly • DD aay ef..., •• mlp& tq .. laa-• IMla elf .. Wlalcll ar• •• ....... ... tnad• a. ps-, ■•ale cvnat
  • ~ rV INFO PARIS VIENNA BRUSSELS LONDON •• L P ■O .AID AG" co"' "'"" FROM U.S. Embassy OTTAWA INT LAIi TA" SUBJECT: Proposed Sale of Canadian Uranium to France T" ARMY 010 INOICATO" a XM ■ Al" CIA NAVY DATE: )0 June 1965 REF r
  • of "going nuclear" expenditures future ·aid levels.· dual emphasis.on and on the need to hold down defense can be expected to encou~age India·'s to hold the line a$ainst nuclear weapons. unless ways can be found of 111eeting India's
  • A 2·2.,\·\\ N~bt\·Z-~b 06f draft "Draft Aide-Memoire" s 3 10/18/63 A 07 cable London 2114 s 2 10/29/63 A 09 cable London 2089 s 3 10/28/63 A 10 cable Deptei 2673 to London s 4 10/24/63 A 11 cable Deptei 2709 to London s
  • of the Export Control Act we of course try to give reasonable consideration to our other special responsibilities to promote and expand our export trade, to encourage our private foreign investments, and generally to aid our national efforts to improve the U.S
  • capabilities, operating independently, are expensive, prone to obsolescence, and ·lacking in credibility as a deterrent." While our policy with respect to denying any aid to French nuclear deterrent program is thus firm and unchanged, we are also being careful
  • funds under Public Law 480. (2) A formal proposal of the program would be made to Madras University by FSU and Madras University would forward this program to UGC for approval·. UGC would seek AID financing from the United States and use , rupees
  • ,•vE HAD A VERY SUCC!SSFll. MEETING•WITHDALEY AND HIS AIDES. IT WAS SIMILAR, HE SAID, 'TO A NEETIN8 RE HADLAST WEEKWITHILLINOIS GOV. OTTO KIRNER. SEABORGSAID THAT CHICAGO•vILL PLAY AN IMPORTANTROLi II MAINTAININS THE NECESSARYENVIRONIINT FORTHE
  • successors will hardly most of whom now accept military matters belong to his not only the size of the military budget will the "reserved but also the again become sub­ of contention. In a pinch, aid funds de Gaulle to the nuclear
  • UNCLASSIFIED 1722132 JUN 64 THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINCilTON 12 June 1964 Forwarded from Commander Josephson, Naval Assistant Military Aide, at the request Captain Dowdell. to the of ~ ~~~1~ =.:~i'i ..,. QlEV, 6-61) NAVY DEP~RTMENT -r-c J 67 41
  • ? In my opinion, there is a common interest in the four nuclear nations having a policy ofstopping additional Nth nations from developing their own atomic-hydrogen weapons. I do not believe the Soviets, any more than the United States, want to aid
  • 43 Action . SCI · Info SS GPM · SP SC L H NEA p I ­ I.l' USIA NSC :INR CIA ·NSA I· I. ~ ;I ~ DOD 1',11 SFW AID tI. cu COM I I f DOI INT UNCLASS IF I,=ED::::-..--­ l RSR J I It : t I ! I l 1 1 l {r
  • of our problems in this area are likely to arise, with weexpiatned -CONFlOEN'r1AL - 6 - our policy in an Aide•Memoire given the French Government last The purporrt the Aide•Merrioire is that (?f the US will not find it possible· to p~rinit
  • to the General Aasembly by its Foreign Minister, Mr. Gromyko, on 19 ..-•,...t as here Septeaber 1963, declar d that the Sovi t Gov•Y'"l' and now ready to take ■easur s to prohibit the arms r c fr apreading to outer apace. Mr~ Gromyko al o aid that wer desirO\d
  • •• t•hn!Ml .)> tar r tar ranmsi, £#))(1) PIIIOt ■ ldll ~ QllS no m.dw• data to .,,_ Son aid Cbicaa DOV • pdata but Mrelt than that waured not. be danpl- ot tbia lllgbt <-hcN&bWa aboal.d imtieatien ..-.1¥ to Jl'Nnch tran.d.Nien
  • -Moooy -RE(by -SAUND£Rs -SAYRE -THOMSON EMBTEL844, DEPTELs·l062, 1085. Text .aide memoire received words deleted~ from SAG January 6 supe:rfluous DOD DAC A.EC WHB IU'iI{ Begin Quote. With referencf~. aide memoire left by Ambassador Satterthwaite
  • on nuclear proliferation. By the time of the latest French pur­ chase request in late 1964, the U.S. had come out agalMt proliferation rnd decided a,alnst aiding France further In atomic delivery systems. The French are thqht to be· producing enoueh enriched
  • 'between the cirilian and the m;Htary a,encle• of the U. S. Cion~ npre•ented by the Atomic Ener17 Commi••ion on one aide and the Defeue Department oa t:ha other~ Thi• baa rn;_,nffeated it.elf in maay way■ but la DO way more pl"O• IIOUDCedtbaa la the al"ea
  • ? 1mpllcat.lons. Tqo many are accevtlng the for, and to construct, adntinlster, and.· Mr. ASPINALL. I will be ,Ind to yield words of the President and his aides mnintaln an ext.ension ot tte Blue Ridse to the gentleman. without crl,ic,il scrutiny ~ to the ultl
  • vate these measures 10 that defense comes before exploration. It is futile to assume that the imag­ ination-capturing moon program will aid us herein. Knowledge of tre• mcndous value is being gained, but national defense against a hostile, racing Soviet
  • and efforts In Today he aid he bad uked 17 per cent Increase over the,_., the United Nations 'that the Secretary of State ..to ex- funds for the fiscal year 1967, }· eventually would produce a plore with-other nations their Mr. Humphrey said. ~ 1 treaty
  • ON NEW APPROACHESTO ABM DE.FENS· ANO ON DEVE OPMENT OF SOPHlSTlC.ATPD PEN ·'TRATI.ON DEVICES FOR OUR OFFENSIVE FORCESo IN ADDITION)VASTSUMS@HAVEBEBNSPENTFOR PENE~RATION AIDS TO­ OURE'ISTING MISSILE FORCE. A LIGHTAB!-1SYSTEM WHICHWOULD GIVE APDITIONAL
  • that our !nt~retation ot t~e Export Control Act _includes ~ •• •iet tl·.at any aid to the build--.ip ot the economic potential ot bloc .. .-ions ~houl.d be con::;;.:..'9\le;o. g,o g. ..-~olation ot the Act. This is a I:list ..~ • .. ..)ressi.)n. ·::~1eAct c