Discover Our Collections


  • Tag > Digital item (remove)
  • Collection > National Security Files (remove)
  • Type > Text (remove)

131 results

  • DECLA~IFlED 12356, Sec. 3,4 E.O. M.J Bv~ q1-1~ . NARA, .D ate Zit f1Y -2via Gromyko. 6/21/67 You may be abl e to smoke him out a little in advance. 5. With respect to ABM-ICBM, Kosygin is in a position where he must give you a simple Yes
  • Folder, "HOLLYBUSH ‑‑ June 23 & 25, 1967, Glassboro, New Jersey, Kosygin & Gromyko conversations," NSF, Files of Walt Rostow, Box 10
  • am. Kosygin Lyndon B. Johnson Kosygin: I welcome your message. We feel that it is the duty of all great states to s·ecure a speedy end to the military conflict, as indicated in Secretary Rusk's earlier message to Foreign Minister Gromyko
  • By.....__->-.. 'An,A, Da.......__.........,P'I 7 Referring to recent discussions in New York, the ·secret·ary recalled that he had informed Gromyko that while there appeared to be agreement in principle on refraining from placing weapons . of mass destruction- in orbit
  • Minister Gromyko may go. With respect to the Chinese Communist nuclear test, the short-run effect in Asia will be intense fear of fallout. A serious, long - run effect will be felt in Japan and India. Now is no time for a new policy toward Communist China
  • put Cairo right on this matter and help us eliminate that kind of needless inflammation. We have expressed to your government our views on the of Tiran in my letter to you of May 28 and Secretary of State Rusk's letter toForeign Minister Gromyko
  • · light on this major problem. I am going to MoscovJ on the 13th March along \.Ji th the Indian Jim1bassador in tl e USSR and - expect to see Mr. Gromyko • Mr. Khruschev there. ·ter having a talk with hem about our two major headaches he India-Pakistai.11
  • tell Gromyko that we are willing to check this out with our allies, we may not get a real test o'f Moscow -- and it would be harder to put the monkey on the Russians' back. ~ .~Il;-t~pr..opo&8PWoakl gw~ u ch:-mo:P~On:wncinw,publi:~ s-ewtha~ h~'?ffl>¥ed
  • . - - -- -----·-- ----- ...... · -· -_- · ----- _-- - . ·-:-- ---~--- ·--.---:- --=-.:___:: .~_ ----==-:=- ~ ~------ -~ ---~ -- -··- - -,.-. .. ·.. ~ ·:_',-.> ...., ~ ! ~ -- .j . ·., .. ~- .. Lun.c heon with the President SEGRE:r Tuesday. September 26, 1967. 1:00 p. m. Agenda 1. Sect. Rusk-Gromyko Dinner. A Report and Evaluation. (Under Sect. Katzenbach) 2. :ttegotiati:ng ·T rack: SituatiQn Report and Next Moves
  • • but they fit together 1n helplAg make clear the dilemma faced lsy Moscow at the present time -- 1n the Middle Eaat and elsewhere. 1. A leqthy l'eport from Arthar Goldbers cm hi• talk T9•terday with Gromyko and Dobryala. The e•aence o! 1t 1• that tba Soviet
  • , 1965 12:20 p. m. MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT Here is Dean Rusk's first report on his conversation with Gromyko. We seem to have had more to tell hi'm than he to tell us. The Secretary's own su·mmary is in the last paragraph. Jn.-t t:>. McG. B. ~l
  • governing the uses of celestial bodies. After some initial private conversations, and a letter from Gromyko to U Thant which indicated that" the USSR was interested in such a treaty, both the U.S. and the USSR tabled drafts. Ambassador Goldberg proposed
  • in the Soviet-Iranian exchange of notes 1962 in which Moscow accepted Tehran's would ~ot be deployed on Iranian for a Mediterranean of January reference to U Thant of March 10, 1962. to it was in Gromyko's letter There was no reference zone Union made
  • that Gromyko had clearly indicated the Russians want to reach an agreement on the inspection article. Once we and the Russians agree, however, we will then have hell with our allies , who over and over again have objected to provisions of the non­ proliferation
  • of the arsenal on a provisional basis~ strictly he tbUD \!scd terms rc.miniscot developed in 1962 and 1963 for retaining to the of the Gromyko so~a nuclear weapons the end of the process of general and complete disaroac.cnt. The impH.cation vas
  • been sent to 34 foreign governments . Further details are contained in a State Department memorandum attached.) The reaction from th e other side is not what it was last May when Hanoi rejected our note, Soviet Foreign Minist er Gromyko said the note
  • ). ,vith Secretary McNamara. and Nick Katzenbach. Mac suggests that Tommy Thompson might be invited, if we wish to discuss the possibility of stimulating a meeting between Sect. .Rusk and Foreign Minister Gromyko. I have since learned that Gromyko
  • of aa M-c..c.I'\.+ explanatory telegram to Harriman which gives the history of other discussions between us and the Soviets on military expenditures. The fundamental exchanges actua Uy occurred between Rusk and Gromyko, rather than between you