Discover Our Collections


  • Tag > Digital item (remove)
  • Collection > National Security Files (remove)
  • Subject > Outer space (remove)
  • Type > Text (remove)

11 results

Folder, "Military Use of Space," Files of Charles E. Johnson, NSF, Box 15 (Item)
  • would take the place or arms." with blood. death, and rlara." Daily News on June 7, Jt63, respectively, Th.la Ls the official 1983 reafflrmatl n ot that Parley clearly 1ot forgiven his old concerning the ll!e a~ business career boee. September 1981
Folder, "Bombs in Orbit - General (Ballistic Missiles in Orbit, FOBS, MOBS, etc.)," Files of Charles E. Johnson, NSF, Box 11 (Item)
  • which originated the document. (C) Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in the donor's deed of gift. 1/13/2009 QJ ~ NEWS CONFERENCE of SECRETARY OF DEFENSE Robert S. McNamara at Pentagon Friday, November 3, 1967 * * * Mr. Goulding
Folder, "Cooperation in Space - US - Germany," Files of Charles E. Johnson, NSF, Box 13 (Item)
  • thing that now stands between them and final success is the daily quota of their Chancellor •s cigars. Mr. Chancellor, ~n welcoming you to these shores during our Christmas season, we are aware that we have much to be thankful for: a stable political
Folder, "Outer Space Treaty [1 of 2]," Files of Charles E. Johnson, NSF, Box 16 (Item)
  • placed ln orbi around th e RatheT, this resolution c lls for abstention. It would repreae t inte tional r cognit on that the a rac in oute sp ce at no be ex nded Lnto thi new nvir en that while a es eking w ye of l iting and rd cing ezieting P111U1nuants
Folder, "Outer Space Treaty [2 of 2]," Files of Charles E. Johnson, NSF, Box 16 (Item)
  • this morning from New York. Ben~«~d~ Executive Secretary Enclosure: As stated. -COWFIDENTIAL ENCLOSURE * ., -~-~-.,.......,. ....... ---..----- .. ,.__ ,.,. t If• • -- ' • it . t ..•.... it .,._..i. CQNi!II>iNTJAJ FOR MOYERS.AT.TEXAS
Folder, "NSAM # 285: Cooperation with the USSR on Outer Space Matters, 3/3/1964," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 3 (Item)
  • to test the Soviets 1 intentions by further conversation. If, however, the next round of conversation is fruitless, NASA should be requested to develop some specific action proposal that would represent a new initiative on our part. At the last meeting
Folder, "Bombs in Orbit - Committee of Principals," Files of Charles E. Johnson, NSF, Box 11 (Item)
  • By.....__->-.. 'An,A, Da.......__.........,P'I 7 Referring to recent discussions in New York, the ·secret·ary recalled that he had informed Gromyko that while there appeared to be agreement in principle on refraining from placing weapons . of mass destruction- in orbit
Folder, "NSAM # 271: Cooperation with the USSR on Outer Space Matters, 11/12/1963," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 2 (Item)
  • response to the proposals for cooperation already made by President Kennedy and by you. (b) No new high-level US initiative is recommended until the Soviet Union . has had a fur-ther opportunity (possibly ·t hree months) to discharge its current obligations
Folder, "NSAM # 300: Review of Alternative Communications, Navigation, Missile and Space Tracking and Data Acquisition Facilities, 5/19/1964," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 4 (Item)
  • Chile plus Peru and/or Ecuador are denied. i. Establish two new stations, one in Hawaii, and one in either Fiji Islands or American Samoa. A mobile station for special equatorial coverage would possibly be required. 2. Cost: Approximately $14.ooo
Folder, "NSAM # 50: Official Announcement of Launching Into Space of Systems Involving Nuclear Power in any Form [Revised], 4/10/1965," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 1 (Item)
  • in connection with the orbiting and testing of nuclear devices in space. This new draft would replace the old NSAM No. 50 which had been originally issued in connection with orbiting TRANSIT satellites in 1961.- It has been checked out with ·t he responsible
Folder, "NSAM # 354: U.S. Cooperation with European Launcher Development Organization (ELDO), 7/29/1966," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 9 (Item)
  • which they are willing to support. This has the effect of withholding specific Presidential approval of every single detailed item of the long statement. I believe, however, that the new form will have the same value as the long one without