Discover Our Collections
Limit your search
Tag- Digital item (7)
- new2023-Oct (2)
- new2024-Mar (2)
- 1966-04-22 (2)
- 1965-xx-xx (1)
- 1966-12-13 (1)
- NATO (7)
- Nuclear weapons (2)
- Defense (1)
- France (1)
- Germany (1)
- Population (1)
- Speeches, addresses, etc. (1)
- Vietnam criticism (1)
- War games (1)
- Text (7)
- Agency Files (2)
- Files of Charles E. Johnson (2)
- National Security Action Memorandums (2)
- National Security Council Meetings Files (1)
- Folder (7)
- Meeting notes (1)
7 results
- their costs normal tendency were in deficit position member countries, the foreign by several down. reinforce to buy at home. payments union might be helpful. which would undertake for any purpose Some kind Countries could then spend for defense
Folder, "NSAM # 345: Nuclear Planning, 4/22/1966," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 8
(Item)
- for - - our minimum conditions? What are the prospects? If the negotiations fail, how will the U.S. record look -- in Germany, in Europe and at home? Will it be clear that de Gaulle alone is responsible? Are we making sure that Erhard understands that we
- to the allies. They must understand that the demands on u s to me e t home front needs ar e serious - that we are facing a budge t of 142 billion with revenue estimat es of 120 billion. The labor unions are going to get raises and U.S . Government employees