Discover Our Collections


  • Tag > Digital item (remove)
  • Collection > National Security Files (remove)
  • Subject > Arms control and disarmament (remove)

13 results

  • errectl\·.?·· defen;;e c.,tabhsh­ ment ever :itna\\"~ ~> m·,:1: Til'.? try_ !ca­ gotl::'.tcd nnd concluded -.nth the Inter·national Atomic Ener;y Aiiency" e.nd ture o! Uu:i dcc1s10•,m.,kmg tccl 1s 3 n that such D()~otiaUons commence within examination or e
  • that the Ta•k -F orce r-opo11t wlll be available lo• the Prealctoai by the end of Jaawu.-y 1965. la. ·• dclltlon to Mr. Qlpatrlc, the ·members· of tba Ta•k .Fo..c• U•s M•. Ar.ttar H. tu-. -A llen w. Dean Dulle• General Allred M. Oft.ea11-r Dr. Geor.s• B
  • On balance, some combination of pressures and inducements such as those examined in the next two alternatives below would seem preferable to relying solely on pressure. Moreover, given the fact that both the U.S. and Soviets have con­ tinuing interests
  • with restrictions contained in the donor's deed of gift. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION GSA FORM 7122 iREV. 5-82) CONFI DEN'fIAL DECLASSIFIED-~~-~- _::~ ,.~ w. w.. Rostow E.O. 12356. Sec. 3.4 _NY 2 7 - /lo;;J.. By ~ • NARA. Date 11-S"- g7 November 19, 1964
  • -proliferation in coordinated for military a pro• defense action in the contingencies. This memorandum examines a number of general iesues nuclear terms, form of the undertaking, and/or by the two major nuclear or by sny single or formal agreement
  • in preparing for the exercise. Efforts are made to obtain participants with detailed and expert knowledge of the subject to be examined. c. JWGA's politico-military games are generally conducted on an interagency basis with participants from the principal
  • coatrilMator lo tbe We•n ..._ of Ua.e armr ..,x1 •. U:CUT DECLASSIFIED E.O 1,:,,::n, Sec. 3.4 Ei'.4.a,J~. NARA, D3to~-/~ .. - .,, ~-OUTGOING TELEGRAM Department ~ATE, OCOWCI . ~~w ~ of ·state I . • ' '\ 'SECRET '\ 53 1 °' f I~ ,..,, DAC
  • to .prevent the spread .o f nuclear weapons. The Task Force has been asked to examine the problem in its broadest ramifications. It is expected that the Task Force report will be available for the President by the end of January 1965. In addition to Mr
  • research paper are self-explanatory. We would appreciate it it you could have the NSC tiles examined to ascertain whether there is a memorandum to or from President Eisenhower (presumably sometime in the latter part or.1958) describing the functions
  • of BETA I & II-67 was to examine some of the major issues, problems and questions associated with strategic weapons deployment; with particular emphasis on anti-ballistic missiles. In addition to this report, film summary of BETA I & II-67 813@IU!lT
  • ). The advantages of such an approach, largely psychological, are matters a£ judgm.ent. The disadvantages must be examined in the light of specifics~ These are some of the suggestions: diminished {a) Separation of nuclear visibility of the former;. from non
  • DECISIONSCONCERNING ACQUISITION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS Introduction This paper examines to advance or inhibit The study also nuclear a balance of incentives countries weapons. and sanctions of continued However, no attempt and pressures of nucle~r incentives
  • to Bonn had asserted that the United States .- SECRE'r - NOFURN B-II-1 B-II-1 .J 3 D or (Blue) (Red) Page 1 of 8 Pages _S_EC_R_lE':P __ ._!_fO_F'_O_R_N --.. had no choice but to "engage in basic re-examination of US policy toward Germany