Discover Our Collections


  • Tag > Digital item (remove)
  • Collection > National Security Files (remove)
  • Series > Files of Charles E. Johnson (remove)

36 results

  • was very light. Attached are articles appearing April 19 in the Daily Telegraph and The Guardian, and also the Paris edition of the Herald Tribune. 7 The Guardian carried a press wire service dispatch :f'romParis stating that the French confirmed
  • . 3/19/2009 ---- Initials - THE NEW YORK TIMES, 'Pf[URSDAY, JANUARY 4, 1968 China', Late,t At~m.. Teat I• -Believed a Failure . ~ IIY JORNW. FINNEY -.i .. '1'1111..., Tenll'lmle WASRINGTON,Jan. :f-Pre- '· ,. UJ. lfetn • Ducr,,-c1 off
  • but that certainly has no objection was rather if the u.s. more milj,. time for U.S. weapons, the Joint Committee to the PAL System for U.S. weapons. mentioned also that the destruct had been weapons at the bases visited, and he assumed on other weapons 1n
  • use of of nucloar weapons. I confim that the Memorandum Understanding -enclosed viith your letter correctly reJresent,s the position of my Government. J"t the s~~a time I note your reference to the continuing validity of the underta.'d.ngs g1van
  • are still basically the same as·those developed in 1952, at a time when substantial U. S. a.nd Allied forces and resources were engaged in Korea and therefore not available in Europe. Because of this history ·and-the size of the nuclear shield provided
  • this the approach is not likely leaders At the same time, security needs, to deter an Indian nuclear weapons program indefinitely. 4. Possibility of a "Peaceful" Explosion. other· immediate issue worth noting at this S~&IMITED ... There is one time
  • leaders that there was no need for our country to develop a FOBS system. While develop­ ment of it could be initiated at any time for relatively rapid deployment, our analyses conclude that it would not improve our strategic offensive posture
  • with respect to the Indians is to buy time during which, hopefully, we can move forward on broader fronts to bring under more permanent control the dangers inherent in the proliferation of nuclear weapons. /s/ DeanRusk Dean Rusk •• ·CEIVED ~-os I 0\1'S
  • in advance of presentation . 3. The U.S -. statement would include language designed to provide a basis in the public record for re-opening the queo?tion of verification at a future time should it become desirable to do so and for withdrawing if necessar y
  • . should be prepared to pay for such agreements. security optimum c. How far it is in the U.S. interest to go in meeting Indian concerns, what form such action mi'~t take, and what the timing might be. d. Whether need to be pursued. there are other
  • repairs to the ship to place her in pre-casualty con­ dition. When this point is reached, there will be material and legal questions which must be negotiated and solved be­ fore we can determine what future course of action we will takeo At the time
  • that the I:ldians have yet decided to begin weapons development. At the same time, evcrythiJ:1« the Indians have done so far would be compatible "1th a wce.J?.Onsproe;ram 11' at sane future date it appeared desirable to start one. 'lbis is probably no accident. One
  • on the part of any foreign government by that time to take her. As you may know. there is a "last ditch" effort being made by a small group of private individuals, Acericans and Indians, to persuade the Indian Government to reverse its recent decision and take
  • keep NAC fully and proq,tly informed of developments at Geneva • • You should express readiness consider any points 3. by allies and offer such further clarm.cations raised as may be posoible in next two weeks; at same time you should make
  • moat crltlcal time adcla ao al1nUlcant n11elear coatrllMatlOD to tbe exploalve rleld al tbe bigb exploalYe •J•te.m (ao al1alficant auclear Jleld baa beea 1eaerallJ deflaed aa about 4 pDllada el HE equlvalellt)o -2- In any aucb take-over lt l
  • i4fo~1at~on of the U.S. delegation~ a space veh cle fox these purposes ca be taken to be one which completes at least one orbit around pe:d.od the earth, or entere outer space fox some substantial of time~ That is, the prohibition is not inte ded
  • and provisions of the Treaty are being realized. ARTICLE IX 1. This Treaty shall be open to all States for signature. Any State which does not sign the Treaty before its entry into force in'.accordance with paragraph 3 of this Article may accede to it at any time
  • it nuclear forces. to delineate (France's timing, quality, country. which would be strategic nuclear or cost, or collaborator." and useful the export to that of denying to France those things weapons program) by significantly would identify
  • less than 2o estimate 60 days [US will of f.M-. duration (that is until contract~d make Pelindaba Reactor consideration making every if this at same time place under nuclear fuels needed additional IJrDB&XR!UUtlHIX/Of deliver
  • be reflected in a treaty, subject only to reasonable safety precautions. The USSR has sought to qualify the right of access with such concepts as nreciprocityn and agreement as to the timing of visits. b. Reporting - Our treaty article as tabled provides
  • On the orders of the da7: .(Tn1naration] Mr. Real Caouette
  • relatively long-range mis­ siles; at this time we have not determined the exact nature or status of the program. 4 IMPAt:l' OF CHINESE COMMUNIST NUCLEAR W!.APONB S. FrfflCI. N'tldmr Te,t Pror,,am Turning to the French nuclear .test J>?OP.1
  • regard and the deep affection in which I personally hold you. That regard and that affection are reflected throughout America. There is no truth to the rumor that your reputation as an economist prompted us to invite you here to visit us at budget time
  • . -Fnacla coepentioa la botb tbe ''ceautructlft and •11U11Ctlw" aapecta of wclau Wrff. Ha look• ~ to aDOtber vlalt to tile UaltiN State• Dest ,-a.r wbea Ile wUa the AEC mlpt, ban more time to ..... atalf _. Yl•Hiac AEC flldllU.a. r f.raia &om •Jial that I f
  • to their is favorable no doubt attempt the unpopular cause. to bring who are likely nuclear ownership greatness "merchants have to be discreet, officers since pressure de Gaulle's connnitted than de Gaulle. these also time they on the general's
  • of ncr space and outer space. These rocket forces, promises categorically two zones relate quite diJfercntly to that Soviet rockets could be launched our security. from satellites "at any desirable time Outer space engulfs the limitless and at any point
  • lnformaUon. (B) Closed by statute or by the agency which originated the documenL (C) Closed In accordance with restrictions contained In the donor's deed at gift. ' j P' DD~sn~ I u , , l\Ilt.l lll,} JdU1 USP f • , • I • r ) TH~ NEW YORK TIMES
  • of the existiI!g ~iological, chemical end physica~ processes end ·balances; Each State shall provide timely announcement and c.ny necessary amplifying - ... information of any mt.rine activity or ex.:;ieriment planned by it or its nationals that coul~ harmfully
  • HAMPTON BLVD. IF TRANSPORTAT ION INFORMATION IS 'PROVIDED WILL ARRANGE FOR PICKUP AT AIRPORT. 31 ACT 00 09 03 33 92 IP FLAGPLOT BFR CONTROL NO. 33733/ CIRCUIT NO. A422 PAGE 1 OF PAGES TIME 1 or DATE TIME GROUP RECEIPT 18/00382 JUN
  • the possibility of our denial being effective, at least to hinder the timing of the French nuclear effort. Therefore I would withhold approval until the British had been approached and given a brief period to respond. The IBM computer is in a much different
  • , the NATO exercise scheduled to begin October 12, or to eliminate atomal play therefrom. The time urgency is due to the fact that the U. S. security authorities concerned must make final determinations covering procedures and regulations for transmitting
  • anything to do with the Committee of Principals. It might be possible to find something by talking personally to Bromley, but the time hasn't seemed to arrive; if you want to talk with him, that might help. * Attached. Ina
  • : IN OU~ ·REL~ti-pNS, -~~o.:sq . TIMELY WITH RESPECT TO DISCUSSIONS NOW:GOlNG ON WJTHIN··GOJ coNcERN I NG oRGAN I z Ar I oN AND ~ui'uRE ·THRust· ·oF ri's owNsPAcE PROGRAM,THAT I t-.Jrr 1 AL PRESENT Ai'ioN SHOULDeE :HADEto PRi HE PAG~ 2 RUALO! 4765D 4 9 ti
  • to facilitate these efforts by significantly affecting timing, q,uality or costs or would identify the U·.s. as a major supplier or collaborator. However, •· this directive is not intended to restrict unduly full and useful .cooperation in non-•trategic programs