Discover Our Collections


15 results

  • S~/LIMITED some prospect intentions, DISTRIBUTION now be SECRtT/LIMITED DISTRIBUTION > without further narrowing our freedom of action us in undue Congressional - For India, the problem is how such US assurances, planning discussions
  • ;mna:ncnt Ar.~ncy for 3 y,:nrs etcse:~1e3 our overwhelming a1111ron\l-Cor IAEA saleguards as aornethi~ which environment. •• the Agency hns been In the lorcCront In ·exist n.nd can be relied upon to enforce Absent this o;:>tlu:-ithe United Srnt~s America
  • would probably influence which would threaten a democratic b. and probably and enhance Soviet the other action It would greatly the Indians strains .. needs, Union. in India, Such drastic to develop its to look at once
  • Page 1 LBJ LIBRARY DOCUMENT WITHDRAWAL SHEET Doc # DocType Doc Info Classification Pages Date Restriction 04 report "Chronology of Correspondence & Actions on Additional Fuel. .. " s 4 12/63-7/65 A 07 cable Deptel 5307 to Paris C 2
  • THE INDIAN NUCLEAR WEAPONS PROBLEM 5 A. ,Background . . . 5 Basic Considerations . . B. 5 c. Courses of Action 8 Economic Pressures Inducements 1. & 8 a.. Discussion . 8 b. Recommendations . 10 2. Security Aspects .. 12 . a. Discussion .. . 12 b
  • imbalances" in. South Africa as their guest in June. The "banning" action taken against the Mideast. A less sanguine view came from the newspaper Al Abram, mouth­ Robertson,· from which there is no ap- • piece of the NassC'rjtovcrnment. It was, peal
  • is predicated the former suggests force would funds some years or the power that limitations implied but also transfer But de Gaulle's Those opposed to the nuclear stringent action of his hold on the voters deputies. foreign to allot "normal
  • -nuclear.weapons program Parliament. ••rve LYON WGM t " • . r. • r ... • •• , . .: .; lleBI :, . • l- Jepart1ne.~t INCOMlhG "TELEGRAM .f 'J iilM!!:P 35 ~ Action • FROM: Paris ss TO: Secretary SR G NO:. ~47, Jul! 24, 7 ••• AC:ION
  • to Tbe Committee queatioaed the le1ality of auch a plan and in DecemboT 1959 i-equeated that ao further action be taken until t:·A Committee collld nriew it futbor in lipt of the lc,gislati.n hiatory of the 1958 &mud• nwnt• aad the 1959 &1nemanta
  • ■ of tlut fac .. alMI pr•••at policy ae &bey met. I cumot ••e llow Commerce can aay further In MWldoo. Juab capacity eompater equipment or &ecluaolo1Y to Fraace. tiler• le a proltlam of wlaat enforce.meat action ■11.ould be taken aaaiut CDC. A Mm&D.d
  • of and concurs in the above action. It has been noted that previous determinations have been made which permit limited dissemination of the atomic information involved to NATO member states and the Channel Command and that the proposed determination would permit
  • we recommend that NSAM 294 be construed to DECLA.. I i E.0. BycJ»k ID l ~ .3-IZ~'i a~o1'=» - 2 call for denial of exports covered by NSAM 294 only when our denial action would be effective to impede the French nuclear weapons program
  • _eowMANV ~~~!~R - Y RECD: 3 4:55 P~ FEBRUARY _JE~UP _JO FROM: OTTAWA AMEMBASSY _KOMER _MOODY JEEDY _$AUNDERS· _$AYRE _THOMSON G H p USIA NSC ACTION: INR CIA DATE: NSA • FEBRUARY 3 5 PM DOD SCI E AEC COM L'l'ff TRSY RMR Ci IIFlB!!!IH I
  • derived from the United States. The Director, DIA did not feel that any drastic action was justifiec. on the basis of the &?ecific evidence cited to date. General Carroll believel that we should take account only of the broader ?roblem in stating intellige
  • ...... ss 1382 , • ACTION: AmembaaayPAB.IS- Jt8 ~ \ ,..~ TOPOL PRI USMiaalon GENEVA TODIS PRIORITY 13 ,u ~•-·,, I INFO: G SP L AmembaaayANKARA (by pouch) " ATHENS (by pouch) " BONN " BRUSSELS (by pouch) COPENHAGEN (by pouch) THE HAGUE