Discover Our Collections
Limit your search
Tag- Digital item (6)
- new2023-Oct (2)
- new2024-June (1)
- new2024-Mar (1)
- Bundy, McGeorge, 1919-1996 (1)
- Joint Chiefs of Staff (1)
- Rostow, Eugene V. (Eugene Victor), 1913- (1)
- State Department (1)
- 1966-04-22 (2)
- 1962-xx-xx (1)
- 1963-xx-xx (1)
- 1965-xx-xx (1)
- NATO (6)
- Nuclear weapons (2)
- Brazil (1)
- Cuba (1)
- Defense (1)
- France (1)
- Germany (1)
- Laos (1)
- National Security Council (U.S.) (1)
- Population (1)
- Speeches, addresses, etc. (1)
- Vietnam criticism (1)
- War games (1)
- Western Europe (1)
- Text (6)
- Agency Files (2)
- National Security Action Memorandums (2)
- Files of Charles E. Johnson (1)
- Vice Presidential Security File (1)
- Folder (6)
6 results
- known that such arr~ements exist. What is the reason for holding this Mr. Conway said the Joint Conmittee had made this so closely? suggestion four years ago and he saw no reason why it would not be a good idea now. Prime Minister Erhard
Folder, "NSAM # 345: Nuclear Planning, 4/22/1966," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 8
(Item)
- for - - our minimum conditions? What are the prospects? If the negotiations fail, how will the U.S. record look -- in Germany, in Europe and at home? Will it be clear that de Gaulle alone is responsible? Are we making sure that Erhard understands that we
Folder, "NSAM # 345: Nuclear Planning, 4/22/1966," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 8
(Item)
- will retire in the fall. Erhard seems the logical and probable successor because of his popular appeal and the difficulty the king-makers (Brentano-Dufhues-Strauss) will face in agreeing on an alternative. The present coalition (CDU/FDP) will probably continue
- . Looming over all If large Germany will scale of this have to be a major source. political Erhard has said element publicly there And, given German will have to be an in any German loan decision. more than once that what Germany does