Discover Our Collections


  • Type > Text (remove)
  • Tag > Digital item (remove)
  • Specific Item Type > Folder (remove)
  • Subject > Nuclear weapons (remove)

31 results

  • enriched two year,. sive force of the fission triger. -tes Ma An Sdoaao, = ,,....., PRESERVATION cu.-Y PRESS RELEASE The UDlted Stat.a nuclear baa detected teat la the atmoapbere tu i8tb ol December uother Chine•• Comm-.mbt at taelr te•t
  • -80WOlEI _.ll)hidl _CHASE _COOPER AYNES n:: M f'_KLE,N I"> _j(CW_ - __a."tDY 5:::ilRs - N a:: ~ -;r~ Following publication of the John Finney article in the Paris edition of the NewYork Time·s on April 18, British press coverage of the subject
  • the presence SECRETARY RUSK: North Vietnam is not clearly on board in this. The acceptance of North Vietnam of South Vietnam at the conference table is a recognition that the Viet Cong are not sole government in the South. We must press for flat commitments
  • said yesterday that in both that case and the unpublicized one following the December 18 Soviet test the Russians had not given a very satisfactory response. However, the issue was not pressed in either case and no charge of violating the test ban
  • SECRE TA ~ y• S S T~M ~NT WHJC ~ FROV ! DED DETAI LS O~ TH ~ Department of State TELEGRAM UNCLASSIFIED PAGE ~2 ST AT E 67 963 SYSTEM • TRANSCRIPT 0~ SEC RETARY MCNAMA~A•S PRESS CONFERENCE '. WAS TRANSMITT ED I N US ! t, ~I i~EL~ SS FILE EUF 135
  • FRANCE DASA DCA DIA ./ZEN DSA · J.··. ·' ·, I 1 •.' ' .·.. ! ... , P. ."• DISTRIBUTION: . OASD(PA)- 10 -F. a·. -1 P&P~5 DIS-1 DSR-2 DCR-1. : l'l ,r-. e. c -/ .' INFO: .· PRESS SECRETARY .TO THE PRESIDENT :., . . 3179
  • lines 1n two critical areas and negotiations broke down in Pan1nunjom. The US pressed the ROKGovernment for moderation in view of already serious US commitments in Southeast Asia and Europe but the Park Government demanded immediate airlift from Vietnam
  • this memorandum to establish guidelines for this discussion. l. Unless I give specific instructions to the contrary, I do not wish any American official in any forum to press for a binding agreement at this time. I wish to maintain the position established in our
  • •s-u C. Secu.. aa -bd N....._ apace• • IUwr Te'""'• Geac
  • on the same basis as units of the US Sixth Fleet are currently supported. As the Council is aware, the US Sixth.Fleet is eannarked for assignment to NATO in view of 1 wish to reiterate the state­ recent inaccurate press reports, ... ·.•• .ment the United
  • . This will be a tough one to handle because the Department of Defense is pressing for this weapon even though the technical studies make it of more doubtful value than previously thought. I . New weapons in the other major categories of increase are the deployment of lv
  • uranium becomes available, there have been hints in the press that France is having difficultieswith its program. Should this be true, the first generation of both the land-based and subm11rine­ launched missile systems might have to use warheads developed
  • to be clear about two other matters, to the G·e rmana as well as among ourselves: a. It is Paris, not Washington, that is pressing oa the aerm.aaa a choice between ~....ranee anc:l the u. s. ; 5. We ought to accompany the NATO reorsanb:ation with as manr
  • Securi;: y Af:c..i:.· ;:; J::ick V.:;.lc:1::i, Special _.:,.ssistant to the President \'/alter Jenki ns, Special Assistant to the Presiden t: G...-or ~ e Ret::dy, Press Se cre t ;:i.ry to the ?:resident _..lajo ::- General Chester V . Cliiton, Militu.1-y
  • by aircraft a French firm is developing at the French missile Given this counter-deterrent. warheads that propellant, maintenance a dangerous to do so. to dAlivery On December 7, 1964, the French press survival. technology a decision adapted
  • with 40 Joel Le Theule, November 7, 1963, Journal officiel, p. 6729. 41 Journal officiel, p. 6735. 42 July 23, 1964, press conference, Le M:>nde, July 25, 1964. 43 Sondages, 1963, No. 3, p. 104. 44 charles de Chambrun, Journal officiel, p. 6765
  • a feasibility study brought about by the French, British, and U.S. SSTpro­ posals being publicized in the Western press. By 1962 Soviet press articles car­ ried sketches of an SST obviously derived from the Bounder bomber prototype. Al­ though not an economical
  • States to •1t a terrible price to pay for a pack o! Mr. HOS:\!ER. l\ir. Speakrr, today we ·selectively proliferate purely defensive words v.·hich could be quite meaningless re-~~!\·ed a message from the t>-residc:nt nuclear armaments to hard-pressed U.S
  • of the United States drawn than wa• the CUban For example, with respect Kennedy made the following in bis press confe~ence of May 8, 1963: "We support the security of both Israel and her neighborso We seek to limit the Near --COHF IDENTIJ.L can
  • - -tomorrow, Thursday, December 12, 2 - 3 :30 p. m Room SC-1042, Pentagon You may recall that you answered General Wheeler's invitation by saying that you would try to attend but could not promise. There is no pressing reason for you to do so unless you would
  • of mounting pressure in Parliament to go nuclear, is not clear. Lower -Indian officials have been quoted in the press as believing that a nuclear explosive for "peaceful purposes" "'- would not vioiate India's formal commitment to Canada to use plutonium from
  • to be an atomic bomb. United States drops atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Bishop Oxnam anc. John Foster Dulles ask suspension of atomic bomb use. Soviet press urges atomic knowledge pooling and hints at international rac:e to better US bomb. Major General
  • HOMELASTEVENINGA NUMBER OF FRENCHMEN SPOKETO HIM ABOUTTHE PRESIDENTfSCo.NENTSAT PRESS CONFERENCE AND EXPRESSED CONSID£RAB~E BITTERNESSOVERWORDS HE USEDIN CONDEMNING FRENCHNUCLEAR PROGRAM.THE WORD"INIMICAL" UNFORTUNATELY HASA MUCHSTRONGER CONNOTATION IN FRENCH
  • on. In early 1970, incontrovertible US intelligence that the Soviet Union was committed to achieving uclear su eriorit. It also had been confirmed In the Middle being pressed indicated strategic that the with outside-help. Although~ _ _.increased trade
  • be prudent to continue the techniee.l i'rork now unde:r-.·:ay revision cf tt.1;:, cu1'".i-entembargo c:.efini­ 2.-:d to press in cooa1tor a realistic tion. With respect to the computer complex that Control D:1.t.e.Co:..1>oration proposed to ID..'Portto East