Discover Our Collections


  • Type > Text (remove)
  • Tag > Digital item (remove)
  • Series > Files of Charles E. Johnson (remove)

34 results

  • in a recent memorandum has stated his belief that a major non-nuclear option for NATO is feasible and 11Possible measures of arms control, including ~esirable. He has stated, actions to halt the spread of nuclear weapons, are facilitated by the kind
  • into the atmosphere during the period of warning of the missile attack. That is the primary advantage of BMEWS. What the FOBS does is circumvent BMEWS. So if you were a Soviet planner, possibly concerned about the bomber element of our force; this might be one action
  • would make the Allies Hasn't this they now have? He thoust+e realize better sort of information of information understand the actions what the actual the U.S. has ot more information, the arrangements tor release present situation
  • advisory committee for space and aeronautics, has declared, "The ad­ ministration's negligence in military space dcvclopmcnt is a disastrous course for the future of America," and his alarm is ccbocd by such noted Scnaton as Barry Goldwater and Margaret
  • S~/LIMITED some prospect intentions, DISTRIBUTION now be SECRtT/LIMITED DISTRIBUTION > without further narrowing our freedom of action us in undue Congressional - For India, the problem is how such US assurances, planning discussions
  • ;mna:ncnt Ar.~ncy for 3 y,:nrs etcse:~1e3 our overwhelming a1111ron\l-Cor IAEA saleguards as aornethi~ which environment. •• the Agency hns been In the lorcCront In ·exist n.nd can be relied upon to enforce Absent this o;:>tlu:-ithe United Srnt~s America
  • COMMISSION New NATO 144b Agreement In your joint letter that I approve Government states to me of a proposed States Atlantic to the exchange -------- , you recommended new NATO 144b Agreement of the United of the North relevant c. of America
  • would probably influence which would threaten a democratic b. and probably and enhance Soviet the other action It would greatly the Indians strains .. needs, Union. in India, Such drastic to develop its to look at once
  • Page 1 LBJ LIBRARY DOCUMENT WITHDRAWAL SHEET Doc # DocType Doc Info Classification Pages Date Restriction 04 report "Chronology of Correspondence & Actions on Additional Fuel. .. " s 4 12/63-7/65 A 07 cable Deptel 5307 to Paris C 2
  • THE INDIAN NUCLEAR WEAPONS PROBLEM 5 A. ,Background . . . 5 Basic Considerations . . B. 5 c. Courses of Action 8 Economic Pressures Inducements 1. & 8 a.. Discussion . 8 b. Recommendations . 10 2. Security Aspects .. 12 . a. Discussion .. . 12 b
  • imbalances" in. South Africa as their guest in June. The "banning" action taken against the Mideast. A less sanguine view came from the newspaper Al Abram, mouth­ Robertson,· from which there is no ap- • piece of the NassC'rjtovcrnment. It was, peal
  • QI • In - 3 INCOMING TELEGRAM Department of State 89DJEJP71 I £ii£ 85 Control: Rec'd: Action SCI Pretoria FROM: 18999 December 26, 1964 2:56 P.M. -BUNDY-SMir., -BATOR Info .ss G_ Secstate ACTION: INFO: SP L_ DATE: ~E IO 822
  • is predicated the former suggests force would funds some years or the power that limitations implied but also transfer But de Gaulle's Those opposed to the nuclear stringent action of his hold on the voters deputies. foreign to allot "normal
  • n all by tM Un on of Soviet Statee of America of outer space any object ■ kinds of weapona of mass Statu~ (a) To refrain from placing in orbit around the earth carrying nuclear weapons or any other kinda of weapons of ma•• truction. inatalli
  • ~ ~ Mr. Wilson - '£OP SEORgf No Objection To Declassificat ion 2004/03/25 : NLJ-030-011-2-1-6 UTGOING TELEGRAM NDICATE: 0 Department of State COLLEct CHARGE TO -CONFIDENTIAb 57 Orlg!n USUN NEW YORK ACTION: IO Info, I NFO ~ ss ' > Amembas
  • -nuclear.weapons program Parliament. ••rve LYON WGM t " • . r. • r ... • •• , . .: .; lleBI :, . • l- Jepart1ne.~t INCOMlhG "TELEGRAM .f 'J iilM!!:P 35 ~ Action • FROM: Paris ss TO: Secretary SR G NO:. ~47, Jul! 24, 7 ••• AC:ION
  • . 3, Approval Initial for Clearance Per Conversation As Requested Necessory Action Prepare Comment Note and Forward See Me Note and Return Signature For Your Information REMARKS OR ADDITIONAL Reply ROUTING .... FORM 2-u DS-10 r~7
  • \ J' 1/ September 9, 1966 Note for Mr. Smith I underetand that no action le required on thie. Both Ambaeaador Goldberg and Secretary Ruak have talked to the P:reaident alnce this wae prepared. CEJohnaon DEPARTMENT OF STATE WASHINGTON
  • to Tbe Committee queatioaed the le1ality of auch a plan and in DecemboT 1959 i-equeated that ao further action be taken until t:·A Committee collld nriew it futbor in lipt of the lc,gislati.n hiatory of the 1958 &mud• nwnt• aad the 1959 &1nemanta
  • weapons by the US, embaJrgo, as •Was A policy of US dehial can make the weapons­ but US denial from attaining action alone a nuclear ~o desires. that the US· peaceful contributed and delivery potential construct .. OOUP!!!HHAL program
  • ■ of tlut fac .. alMI pr•••at policy ae &bey met. I cumot ••e llow Commerce can aay further In MWldoo. Juab capacity eompater equipment or &ecluaolo1Y to Fraace. tiler• le a proltlam of wlaat enforce.meat action ■11.ould be taken aaaiut CDC. A Mm&D.d
  • . E. Johnson {:::: C. Moor 1/)p'/// Executive SecretariaLv~ FR.OM: Carol Citing of NSC Action 2238 Attached is page 17a from the draft of a history of the Committee of Principals being prepared in the Department. You will note that it has been
  • of and concurs in the above action. It has been noted that previous determinations have been made which permit limited dissemination of the atomic information involved to NATO member states and the Channel Command and that the proposed determination would permit
  • --k;;l-,-- A ri Department of State UNCLASSIFIED PAGE 01 , TOKYO05369 TELEGRAM I, 225 0707042 ACTION E 15 !NFC EA 10,L· 03,0C 06,CCO 00,0TM 02,FCC 02,NASA 04,GPM ~3,INR CIAE 00,NSAE 00,NSC 10,DOOE 00,0ST RSC 01,MM 01,1079 01,COM 08,SCI
  • . Rostow, White House Staff, dated , June 11, 1968 1 stated th~t plans were being made to · trans­ fe:rr ANTON BRUUN to GSA for disposal. Prior to taking. this action, the State Department and the Marine Science Council , Staff were formally asked
  • °"""' ss ACTION: C >.:. ASSADCR CilLT - f ~ II l CUUR bacqround baaia. In rtev -~· . wi~ •hou.ld AOt be dietribut~ be d.11cuased w1th local baTe &lreadT .., ... incpiriH ppeared o! • &I o!!ici II or preee. ahoul ■ pecul.ati ve rt1 c t
  • we recommend that NSAM 294 be construed to DECLA.. I i E.0. BycJ»k ID l ~ .3-IZ~'i a~o1'=» - 2 call for denial of exports covered by NSAM 294 only when our denial action would be effective to impede the French nuclear weapons program
  • office and they said he had forgotten CEJ was on leave and asked that I send it on to Keeny. Keeny's office to keep me informed of what action is taken. 9/ 15/67 - I checked with Jean Barker and she informed me that Keeny w~s doing something on it now
  • _eowMANV ~~~!~R - Y RECD: 3 4:55 P~ FEBRUARY _JE~UP _JO FROM: OTTAWA AMEMBASSY _KOMER _MOODY JEEDY _$AUNDERS· _$AYRE _THOMSON G H p USIA NSC ACTION: INR CIA DATE: NSA • FEBRUARY 3 5 PM DOD SCI E AEC COM L'l'ff TRSY RMR Ci IIFlB!!!IH I
  • ---- Initials -- .. DECLASSIFIED E.O. 13526,Sec.3.5 NLJ D ~ • ;2 1/:l, NARA,Date -:,.~-2 • II --- r -·•· • - of State •~~ Department lt\COMING TELEGRAM I, W., tiillllkl 33 034 Action I !.'~I I I I DY-SMITH NDER · ss Info
  • planning for the forthcoming visit to the United States of the HMS RESOLUTION. In response to your request for a recommendation as to whether the President should send a message of welcome 1 Mr. Baird recommends that no such action be taken. ~~~ Staff
  • derived from the United States. The Director, DIA did not feel that any drastic action was justifiec. on the basis of the &?ecific evidence cited to date. General Carroll believel that we should take account only of the broader ?roblem in stating intellige
  • repairs to the ship to place her in pre-casualty con­ dition. When this point is reached, there will be material and legal questions which must be negotiated and solved be­ fore we can determine what future course of action we will takeo At the time
  • ...... ss 1382 , • ACTION: AmembaaayPAB.IS- Jt8 ~ \ ,..~ TOPOL PRI USMiaalon GENEVA TODIS PRIORITY 13 ,u ~•-·,, I INFO: G SP L AmembaaayANKARA (by pouch) " ATHENS (by pouch) " BONN " BRUSSELS (by pouch) COPENHAGEN (by pouch) THE HAGUE