Discover Our Collections


  • Type > Text (remove)
  • Specific Item Type > Folder (remove)
  • Tag > Digital item (remove)
  • Subject > Arms control and disarmament (remove)

Limit your search

Tag Contributor Date Subject Type Collection Series Specific Item Type Time Period

37 results

Folder, "National Security Council (II)," VP Papers, VP Security Files, Box 4 (Item)
  • 504th RSCMeeting NSC Control No. 94 ------ - 8ECR:6't- NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL RECORD OF ACTIONS NSC Action 2456 Reaulta of 1962 Nuclear Teat Program to Date and Teat• Proposed for Remainder of Program a. Di1cuaaed a draft Department
Folder, "The U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency During the Johnson Administration-Part 1," Arms Control and Disarmament Agency Administrative History (Item)
  • )............ 97 Secvirity Covincil Action on Security Assurances..................................... 102 Treaty Opened for Signature ................... 103 Renewed Effort for Strategic Arms Limitation Talks With the Soviet Union (1968)................ 104
Folder, "The U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency During the Johnson Administration-Part 2A - 2B," Arms Control and Disarmament Agency Administrative History (Item)
  • that the United States would not take any actions inconsistent with the resolution. It should also say that the United States was continuing to work toward the establlshjnent of an MLF^ which was consistent vvith the resolution. At the same time
Folder, "NUCLEAR - Non-Proliferation Treaty," Files of Charles E. Johnson, NSF, Box 36 (Item)
  • ;mna:ncnt Ar.~ncy for 3 y,:nrs etcse:~1e3 our overwhelming a1111ron\l-Cor IAEA saleguards as aornethi~ which environment. •• the Agency hns been In the lorcCront In ·exist n.nd can be relied upon to enforce Absent this o;:>tlu:-ithe United Srnt~s America
Folder, "The U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency During the Johnson Administration-Part 2G - 2L," Arms Control and Disarmament Agency Administrative History (Item)
  • "omnibus" resolution, approved by the Disarmament Commission on June 15, condemned continued testing, called for a comprehensive agreement, and asked all states to adhere to the limited test-ban treaty. The United States voted ^Summary of Action, Meeting
Folder, "September 9, 1968 - 5:45 p.m. President's meeting with House leadership," Papers of Tom Johnson, Box 4 (Item)
  • they are seven miles away -­ that 1 s rude -- hit them when they are two miles away. If there is one shred of interest in peace on the other side, we are ready to talk. Hanoi is rigid in its stance. LATIN AMERICA Loss of Ambassador Main was tragic. He was shot
Folder, "JCS -- BETA War Games‑SM Keeny, 1967 [1 of 2]," Agency Files, NSF, Box 32 (Item)
  • and a single control element. Each game will include a United States (Blue) and Soviet (Red) team which will be divided into senior and action-level components. Control will represent third nations, treaty organizations, fate, nature and other influencing
Folder, "NSAM # 355: Indian Nuclear Weapons Problem, further to NSAM 351, 8/1/1966," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 9 (Item)
  • SECURITY ACTION MEMORANDUM NO. 355 TO: The Secretary of State SUBJECT: The Indian Nuclear Weapons Problem, further to NSAM 351 The President has a pproved the recommendations contained in the Secretary of State 1 s memorandum to the President of July 25
  • Folder, "NSAM # 355: Indian Nuclear Weapons Problem, further to NSAM 351, 8/1/1966," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 9
  • National Security Action Memorandums
Folder, "NSAM # 335: Preparation of Arms Control Program, 6/28/1965," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 7 (Item)
  • WITHDRAWAL SHEET (PRESIDENTIAL .LIBRARIES) FORM OF DOCUMENT CORRESPONDENTS OR TITL E DATE RESTRICTION FILE LOCATION National Security File, National Security Action Memorandums, NSAM 335 RESTRICTION CODES (A) Closed by Executive Order 12356
  • Folder, "NSAM # 335: Preparation of Arms Control Program, 6/28/1965," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 7
  • National Security Action Memorandums
Folder, "April 23, 1968 - 2:15 p.m. Tuesday lunch with Rusk, Clifford, Wheeler, Helms, Rostow, Christian, Johnson," Papers of Tom Johnson, Box 3 (Item)
  • like this. We have the following courses of action: First, go back to RP 6 for 48 hours including Hanoi and Haiphong. Second, Third, Executing attacks selectively in Haiphong Executing attacks selectively in Hanoi. -:: TOP SECRET 0
Folder, "JCS -- BETA I & II‑67, Final Report, 4/67," Agency Files, NSF, Box 32 (Item)
  • .............. Summary of BETA.I ............ Summary of BETAII ......... Conclusion ............... A-1 A-2 A-8 A-15 thru. thru thru A-2 A-7 A-15 thru A-19 thru thru B-3 B-29 Senior Critique . . . . . . . . . . . . . C-1 • thru Action-level Critique .......... C
Folder, "Background Paper on Factors which Could Influence National Decisions re Acquisition of Nuclear Weapons (Garthoff)," Committee Files, NSF, Box 1 (Item)
  • that this the months ahead. * This paper is based upon a. more detailed study entitled, "Indian Nuclear Problem: Proposed Course of Action" which was prepared for and approved by the Committee on Nuclear Weapons Capabilities (the Thompson Committee), and submitted
Folder, "November 11, 1968 - 3 p.m. President and President-elect Nixon," Papers of Tom Johnson, Box 4 (Item)
  • action before January 20. W. \ tf. Rostow EYES ONLY Vl WRostow:rln '. !" ,_ NOTES OF THE PRESIDENT•s MEETING WITH THE PRESIDENT-ELECT RICHARD NIXON November 11, 1968 PRESENT AT THE MEETING WERE: The President President-elect Richard M
Folder, "The U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency During the Johnson Administration-Part 2C - 2F," Arms Control and Disarmament Agency Administrative History (Item)
  • that the United States did not p l a n to place any, weapons of mass destruction In orbit: Today there Is no doubt that either the United States or the Soviet Union could place thermonuclear weapons in orbit^ but such an action is just not a rational m i l i t a r
Folder, "[NSC Meeting on] Stockpile Criteria, 10/31/1968, Volume 5, Tab 74," National Security Council Meetings Files, NSF, Box 2 (Item)
  • recommendation when you have before you an appropriate action document to sign. II,..< J,Aj.o!JJ. R ostow SERVICE SET . l,n I ' , EXECUTIVE OrF ICE OF THE PRES IDENT Of"F"IC£ or £MER0£NCY PLANNING WASHIN GTON. 0 . C . 20504 o,.,.,cr; 0
Folder, "October 3, 1967 - 6:10 p.m. Rusk, McNamara, Rostow, Helms, Christian Robin Olds and Col. Cross," Papers of Tom Johnson, Box 1 (Item)
  • , why were they no longer shelled at the Marine site at Conthien. Secretary McNamara said he did not know if this was a result of our action or their decision. The Pre sic.ent asked if we shou1d move our people bad:;:, as ha.s been sugge s·i:e d
Folder, "JCS -- BETA War Games‑SM Keeny, 1967 [2 of 2]," Agency Files, NSF, Box 32 (Item)
  • . return, by the US to a "Fortress America f, philo­ sophy. This could lead to a shift away from reliance on US protection and is likely to induce non­ nuclear nations to initiate nuclear programs. Deployment of ABMsystems by both the US and USSR might
Folder, "Problem of Nuclear Proliferation Outside Europe (Murray)," Committee Files, NSF, Box 1 (Item)
  • be unwise to undertake the new commitments else­ where which might be necessary to reduce the urge to acquire de­ fensive· unclear wP.::inr,ns. / I Contra There is no course of action or inaction which can be undertaken without risk. We, Europe, _China
Folder, "Arms Control on the Seabed," Files of Charles E. Johnson, NSF, Box 19 (Item)
  • . 3, Approval Initial for Clearance Per Conversation As Requested Necessory Action Prepare Comment Note and Forward See Me Note and Return Signature For Your Information REMARKS OR ADDITIONAL Reply ROUTING .... FORM 2-u DS-10 r~7
Folder, "NSAM # 351: Indian Nuclear Weapons Problem, 6/10/1966," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 8 (Item)
  • , June 9, 1966 6:00p.rn. () 'V J '· {, ' ~· .If" \\ Mr. President: For your approval. This National Security Action Memo- \~ randum instructs the Secretary of / State to produce by July 15 specific recommendations for your considera­ tion as to how
  • Folder, "NSAM # 351: Indian Nuclear Weapons Problem, 6/10/1966," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 8
  • National Security Action Memorandums
Folder, "NSAM # 50: Official Announcement of Launching Into Space of Systems Involving Nuclear Power in any Form [Revised], 4/10/1965," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 1 (Item)
  • the poeslbility of radiological injury from · this source is slight and whether the launch of this source is· 0£ such a nature ae to meet with the exeeption from Prea1dential action as provided in ·NS.AM sa (Reviaed). lt: was agreed that the supply of radioactive
  • Folder, "NSAM # 50: Official Announcement of Launching Into Space of Systems Involving Nuclear Power in any Form [Revised], 4/10/1965," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 1
  • National Security Action Memorandums
Folder, "NSAM # 320: Task Force on Nuclear Proliferation, 11/25/1964," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 6 (Item)
  • µ~ g-)l-jC) ~c1&,0 By~ ~ NARA. Date 3- ~o -'l:J---
  • Folder, "NSAM # 320: Task Force on Nuclear Proliferation, 11/25/1964," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 6
  • National Security Action Memorandums
Folder, "Committee of Principals - General," Files of Charles E. Johnson, NSF, Box 2 (Item)
  • . E. Johnson {:::: C. Moor 1/)p'/// Executive SecretariaLv~ FR.OM: Carol Citing of NSC Action 2238 Attached is page 17a from the draft of a history of the Committee of Principals being prepared in the Department. You will note that it has been
Folder, "NSAM # 305: Nuclear Weapons Dispersal Authorization for FY 1964, 6/16/1964," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 5 (Item)
  • is subject to first providing for the requested DoD dispersal requirements. ~.I~) The current authority for dispersal of nuclear weapons in support of non-U. S. forces is derived from National Security Action Memorandum No. 143, as modified, and subsequent
  • Folder, "NSAM # 305: Nuclear Weapons Dispersal Authorization for FY 1964, 6/16/1964," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 5
  • National Security Action Memorandums
Folder, "[September 13, 1967 - 12:32 p.m. National Security Council Meeting]," Meeting Notes Files, Box 2 (Item)
  • pass. But I don't think it will and they will say it was a rebuff because of our unreasonable and inhumane action in the bombing. On balance, that would be a loss in my judgement. Goldberg said I don't agree. Katzenbach said he agrees with McNamara
Folder, "Memo on Security Guarantees and Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (ACDA)," Committee Files, NSF, Box 1 (Item)
  • -proliferation in coordinated for military a pro• defense action in the contingencies. This memorandum examines a number of general iesues nuclear terms, form of the undertaking, and/or by the two major nuclear or by sny single or formal agreement
Folder, "[Briefing Papers for National Security Council Meeting, September 15, 1966]," Meeting Notes Files, Box 1 (Item)
  • of many delegates and figure heavily in the general debate . . The Soviets and other Conununist delegations are likely to attack our policy and actions, and we think it probable that some non-aligned nations will display concern, ·if not out­ right
Folder, "[NSC Meeting on] Draft Treaty on Non/Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, 3/27/1968, Volume 5, Tab 66," National Security Council Meetings Files, NSF, Box 2 (Item)
  • not constitute a new commit ­ ment for the United States but rather gave promise of action by reaffirming our existing commitments under the UN Charter. He reported that the ENDC had now submitted to the UN its repoi-t forwarding the draft text of the trreaty
Folder, "A Way of Thinking about Nuclear Proliferation (Rostow)," Committee Files, NSF, Box 1 (Item)
  • is, of vulnerability position, Denmark and Norway enter is, military however, The Swedes, given special in Stockholm of the Swedish sense to the Soviet Israel The argument on Sweden sufficiently as a rational course costly that for the of action
Folder, "[Briefing Papers for] September 25, 1968 National Security Council Meeting," Meeting Notes Files, Box 3 (Item)
  • that have so far been willing to criticize Soviet intervention. In determining what actions the Assembly might take concerning Cz echoslovakia, there are at least three perti­ nent consid erations for the U.S.: what 't\lOuld b·e he lpful to the Czechs, what
Folder, "Arms Control on The Ocean Bottom Panel I (Nat'l Security)," Files of Charles E. Johnson, NSF, Box 19 (Item)
  • office and they said he had forgotten CEJ was on leave and asked that I send it on to Keeny. Keeny's office to keep me informed of what action is taken. 9/ 15/67 - I checked with Jean Barker and she informed me that Keeny w~s doing something on it now
Folder, "September 25, 1968 - 12:17 p.m. National Security Council," Papers of Tom Johnson, Box 4 (Item)
  • revanchism", Viet-Nam, and the Middle East) and generally will try to place Czech events in a cold war context in hopes of silencing the non­ aligned countries that have so far been willing to criticize Soviet intervention. In determining what actions
Folder, "November 28, 1967 - 12:10 p.m. Project Cabriolet," Papers of Tom Johnson, Box 1 (Item)
  • over Canada would make it extremely difficult politically .. The Soviets have never taken another interpretation. · They have never admitted their actions. DR. HORNIG: There will be two types of reaction. Here in this country I know the reaction
Folder, "The U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency During the Johnson Administration-Part 3," Arms Control and Disarmament Agency Administrative History (Item)
  • and limiting ABMs, the relationship and i n t e r ­ action b e t w e e n ABMs and limitations on offensive missiles, and the implication of possible overseas developments of A B M s . C l o s e l y related to the " a r e a ” contracts was a reimbursable
Folder, "The U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency During the Johnson Administration-Part 4," Arms Control and Disarmament Agency Administrative History (Item)
  • whose expertise is drawn upon by the Agency for special projects or other problems. INTERNAT IONAL RELA T IONS BUREAU T he Bureau has a dual responsibility: first to translate U.S. disarmament policies into action at. the conference table
Folder, "[September 5, 1967 - 1:05 p.m. Tuesday Luncheon]," Meeting Notes Files, Box 2 (Item)
  • . The President said he hopes they (Thieu and Ky) show action even though all the election returns are not in yet and even though they have not been inaugurated. The President said "instead of Dzu taking the headlines, Thieu and Ky should fill the news
Folder, "NUCLEAR - Freeze Strategic Nuclear Vehicles, U.S. Views (Committee of Principals)," Files of Charles E. Johnson, NSF, Box 33 (Item)
  • ...... ss 1382 , • ACTION: AmembaaayPAB.IS- Jt8 ~ \ ,..~ TOPOL PRI USMiaalon GENEVA TODIS PRIORITY 13 ,u ~•-·,, I INFO: G SP L AmembaaayANKARA (by pouch) " ATHENS (by pouch) " BONN " BRUSSELS (by pouch) COPENHAGEN (by pouch) THE HAGUE