Discover Our Collections


  • Type > Text (remove)
  • Collection > National Security Files (remove)
  • Tag > new2024-Dec (remove)
  • Tag > Digital item (remove)

36 results

  • ~ I THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON January TO BOB KOMER FROM: Bill Moyers • ', ,_ ... · 31, 1966 JAMll:9 0, 11:ASTLAND, AIIK, JOHN L, MCCLELLAN, SAM J, ERVIN, JR,, N,C, THOMAS J, DODD, CONN, PHILIP A, HART, MICH, EDWARD Y, LONG, MO, 11
  • EMBASSY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA New Delhi, India, December 2 2, Dear Bob: I am enclosing a photostat of a. recent essay by Harrison Salisbury of the New York Times in which he analyzes the forces which are shaping Asia and comes up
  • a su.cces$~ he also saw :new ourth waiting till he could get etter sens•e of w.hat Congress o.eri.t in repared to go for. 5. You ight ex1,resa your hope tliat there ia no misapprehe1 that U ,e ua.ting In,dia with Pak.is.tan. llas·tri visi'te
  • knows the difference between campaign promises mitmenta and aa one who ls himself' wrestling with running a major with those who talk in term• of concrete country, he is most impressed program•• not just visionary goals. One note o! warning. I hope
  • 2111i4 ....L.. l.,..,-..----·• Indian ab de(e ..:Je ,- ci ion. ~·uea·tion ol tontmg .nt i offe ..r to to.dians if they'll s i-a.p ~ 1.JQ.• 21 production ~1@ rill pz,o'ba.bly·be 1.1....ain ubject your talk with ,. awlea tat .._.orrcr.r,, and l hope cot
  • JUN 2 EMBASSY OF THE UNITED This document consists No _ of _£copies, J_ STATES OF AMERICA of _::?'--pages. Series A. New Delhi, India, May 20, 1965. Dear Bob: I am enclosing a copy of a memorandum on South Asia which I have just sent
  • with tha J?M1 s tastGs.) It 1s hoped tc..at :..t ca.vi caxry o=i the cover either the Great Seal or the President's seal and be caa.o a.~ item for to the :1?11 a. few weeks after his return to Nevt Delhi. presentation For the Count~J Publio .l:ffe.irs
  • standing annual offer of $50 mi 11 ion mi 1 i'tary assista nee credit without being in any way directed ag?inst,Pakistan. Bob Komer concurred in going ahead on this. Ton1Mann at State has informally approved the transaction. AID does not oppose the trans­
  • political than economic. Birla reported that L. K. Jha had told him exactly the same thing. But he returned to the importance of machinery and people to translate intentions into performance. The Indian Government is not highly effective so he hoped the US
  • - earnestly hope of both you and Mrs. Gandh:t so encouragingly Tashkent. Sincerely, Lyndon B. Johnson begun at DEP.-\RT>IEYI' Assr~TA~T OF .;,;TATE Si::cRETARY ~ TO The Secretary THROUGH: S/S FROM NEA- Raymond Ao Hare SUBJECT: Suggested Letter
  • v .., SEGRE~ Dear Bob: I assume military not yet to read am a bit confused by your letter of April 24, and can only that the various messages in regard to the Indian five year plan, high performance aircraft and other questions 11:ad reached your
  • I'll try to ge-t a .fuU readout from Bob on the Gan~ talks. but £or your own protecti-on alter Bob leaves. you may want to- do the same. Here are th•e two ~uestions to ask: i. The kex qu,es tin is whether the President is sufficiently satisfied
  • is in fact sector. will attracted of investment The final test of be the magnitude to India . CO~L ,. Mar ch 21., 19 66 Mr. Robert W. Komer The White House Washington., D. C. Dear Bob: This is the letter you requested on Indian Economic Prospects
  • ________________ , -of telegram to~--~--,-:._ _ TOP'i&~T . I problem becomes one of findjJlg a formula .for peaceful settlement as a substitute for settlement by force. i Desj,ite the problems you mention, I d,eeply hope that you can . reach an agreement, and thereby
  • the Paks have openly flaunted both the Indians and the United States by inviting the Chinese to visit Pakistan at the time the Indian Prime Minister is in Washington and secondly by displaying Chinese tanks '\ openly in a recent parade. Indian leaders hope
  • President, The White House, WASHINGTON, D.C. sincerely, Bahadur -::-_i..T iONAL August SECURITY cou ~crL 4, 1964 Bob The attached is from a· recent to me from Chet Bowles. ( letter 11 drawing with The issue" is the old chestnut India
  • the Prime Minister re with dates meetkt hers on Jam,11ar.y10. the State of the tl1mi©nmeissage an.d (»the!' ®haents and first understands that a December wi~it is oot wcrkabl~p and while the Preaident would very much like convenient fully hopes
  • or Pakistan. is one of international not making any new I very much appreciate your writing and hope that hospital in In~lia will somehow receive relief from ---- '11 ~ /4 .. ,. est per. sonal __ ' ~ L) ,,~ regar~ ~ ..- - 1.1 taA__. rr
  • AND RA.W .MATERIALS AND TO SIMPLIFY PROCEDURES. GOVERNMENTPRESS NOTV '.EXPRESSED HOPE THAT WITH SUFFICIENT ASSISTANCE FORTHCOMING••FROM : FRL ..NDLY COUNTRIES AND INSTITUTINS, IMPORTS CAN BE LIBERALIZED IN VERY NEAR FUTURE. •,·. . ,; .1
  • to undue ties with Peiping. If the Pak military, who were Ayub's power base, became convinced that there was no hope of any more MAP from the US this would powerfully risk their moving closer to the Chicoms. We Americans felt that India• had for too long
  • ---- /)li..!;r DEC . e.o.13 ~.l~,N 4 . _· --- , 196 - February ac l've been sitting on attache ption you' har paper, on ass • u ine a. icon nuclear ly fin it ur ent first hope is that LBJ ml look at tne (at .y sugge·.stion he w ,.r .1.arize
  • in the falL ;;. HHS ~ ..~NTIAL DECLASSIFIED E.O. 'i3 Se, NSC Memo, 1/3 , ....r":< By...,... __ , , Dm- line (I Ne Del i - pril 28, 1964. De r Bob: h ve recently .] 1ic t •ons for Ind· en g·v·n gr t d a of hou ht tot e and other deve o i g
  • tie. •o o emphasize both aelf-help and I dia' ed to co • up ltb 100d oll.lti n to th P proble . If Ayub sets ere fir t (which la in the lap of th aode), it' rucial that ha.tri neith r pout n.or isunder tan . c an 1.hope you'll rive Chi• b t L. K. Jha
  • . ether ( 1) to ti-y th• .a.iv-erro·ute in hope, it ould be e-aaier but i11, knowle tre that oece a.ry con ·ultations on the ill may foi-ee us into s.ee' ing le tislatio or· ( ) to as. •· we•i-e U ely o ••iid u, on the le ,.islati:ve route anyway
  • ! j Classification Page_~3- C'.1LJ.11:i.tLfh ZS: M~Y~~~M~xm:M~~Xi'.'!~~~,~~~X~K~~~g:k~~~J~; ~~~~ XEX'.p~RXD:X:iiiqt{~~~}t~~ti'.~'-!~~ 6. In su~uent c.onversation tlehru noted he. was r:eturn.!ng to India. after. ehri&tcnas and hoped befone de
  • : • A. Our arming of Pakistan befcre 1965 compounded the existing mistrust between Pakistan and India and lesser, ed whatever hope there might have been of r aching an agr ement on outstanding issues. 1 B. In the meantime, the Indians were bitt ly dil
  • ) ~ Page2 LBJ LIBRARY DOCUMENT WITHDRAWAL SHEET Classification Pages Date Restriction Doc# DocType Doc Info 31 memo Johnson to Bundy TS- 1 11/5/64 A 32 memo BOB control sheet TS- 1 11/64 A 33 rpt "Estimated Costs" TS- 2 11/5/64
  • pact? : , . ,J. .... ........ -4S:ZCRE'i' ~SENSITIVE pne last pohit: while it hui·ts me to agree with a:ny close friend and collcaeue, I think Bob Kon'lcr'a memo of this afternoon on this subject, which l have just read, is excellent. ) Francis
  • confirmed Lal Bahadur State• in February Waahington details Shastri today that Prime of India will make an official 1966. The Indian Prime £or talks with the President "Mr. Johnaon welcome• Thia will be Mr. Sbaatri's the Prealdent hopes
  • with the two major problems facing India - the modernization of agriculture and the control of population. I believe these two papers are factually accurate and balanced. I hope that you will have an opportunity to read them. With warm regards, Sincerely
  • in the hope that a transaction old friend. me that Lady Bird joins me in our good talk at the Karachi a close eye on your negoti you will be able to arrange informed it is to be cooped up in a sick work to be done. hope that your recovery I have
  • that someone had told been willing. I am sorry you will be leaving so shortly after my having taken over here. It was a pleasure getting to know you and I hope there will be other opportunities in the future for us to meet. I look forward to them
  • as from this comp it-" on and, thereby, to he nd of the co the US and the USSR would then ha e nothin to fi ht over and nothin which they coul hope divide between hem elv sand to om te). At the same time, the added emp as·s placed on this poli y 1·ne sine
  • Indian need running at least 11 million tons, it will be terribly difficult as a practical matter to get more than two million tons from other sources. This is the town's best judgment, though I hope we're wrong. Sensible guidelines. So the guts of the n1
  • , more than 20 countries··now have vigorous atomic energy programs, and several of them are pressing toward the construction of atomic'power plants to turn out useful amounts of electricity. "In 1946, our nation earnestly hoped that worldwide agree­ ment