Discover Our Collections


Limit your search

Tag Contributor Date Subject Type Collection Series Specific Item Type Time Period

293 results

  • of unfair coverage in Vietnam, or unfair analysis? S: Oh, yes. Bill Moyers did, and Bob McNamara did. But that went with the turf. You know, Truman did, Eisenhower did. We did a debate with Khrushchev--no, not a debate; we did "Face the Nation
  • . In ..the U-2 • Incident and Its ,.!t • CONSIDER first Soviet·: two major Chinese cities, botched handling got 1n the:: relations with Communist . Nannlng and . Canton, ·there __,,tway,Khrushchev wu trying , China Before the Paris peace· have been ·public
  • policies in Asia paralleling our own interests. To be sure, there may be occasions when for. tactical reasons we will momentarily find ourselves on the same side of the table. But a little more than three years ago Khrushchev was threatening Jack Kennedy
  • and more steel for more and more steel plants. As Khrushchev once put it: you can't eat steel. They are struggling to make the beginnings of a modern consum.er economy of the kind enjoyed already in Western Europe and Japan as well as here in the United
  • kind of friends can the President be with Khrushchev, Brezhnev or now Andropov? It's nonsensical to think that one does anything because all of a sudden personal friendship has developed. Every diplomat must look to the interests of his own country
  • 27 A p r il 1965 SPECIAL MEMORANDUM NO. 11-65 SUBJECT; Future S o v i e t Moves in Vietnam 1, in Vietnam. S tep by s t e p , t h e USSR i s g e t t i n g more d e e p ly in v o lv e d The r e c e n t reco rd c l e a r l y shov;s t h a t Khrushchev
  • in Russia's way more than anyone else. Page 50. Views on peace by Ike, Dulles, Khrushchev, Pope Pius, page 83. How the World looks to a Troubled Ally France's Premier Gaillard gives candid answers, in an exclu­ sive interview, to big questions facing his
  • of seventy, thereby giving a substantial, and for the first six mpnths, disciplined majority. And fourth was, really, the combination of Lyndon Johnson and Jack Kennedy who just kept the pressure on. Then fifth, I think I should in candor add, Khrushchev, who
  • with Khrushchev, I was with him. But to the best of my recollection, Senator Johnson had nothing to do with it other than getting the appropriation through the Senate. F: Now the same year, you went back to South America, Mexico, and so on. You came back
  • . beyond our needs. We had a big surplus far It was useful to the Department of Agriculture; it was useful to the nation in terms of balance of payments; and it was useful, terribly useful, to the Soviets, because Khrushchev's LBJ Presidential Library
  • . It was Russia, The President represented us, Khrushchev and Bulganin--they were still doing the dual act then--they represented the Russians of course. Sir Anthony Eden represented the British, I believe; Pinay the French. It was at this conference
  • /exhibits/show/loh/oh Rostow -- II -- 8 got permission from both Mao and Khrushchev to resume the war on the South, and they came back and announced it. You see the pickup of the infiltration in 1958. It's all discussed in there. So, there's a perfectly
  • these subtle insinuations that they had been bandying about, that was one of the main themes of their campaign--something corrupting about Johnson. Yet right at that very moment--this was all spaced within two or three days if you'll remember--Khrushchev
  • and Communist China in Africa. Since the latter: part of 1963, both the Soviets and the Communist Chinese have markedly in­ creased their activ1ties--visits, (Chou En-lai to ten African countries; Khrushchev to the UAR), diplomatic approache~ aid, cultural
  • Justic e Warren to be your Commissar? Do ~ you want Mrs . Khrushchev in there with the DAR You cannot trust your nei ghbors or eve n next of kin . If Mammie is a Commis then you gotta turn her in . Oh we ' re the John Birch Society ••• the John Birch
  • parties along proMoscow or pro-Peiping lines. The new Soviet leadership undoubtedly has in mind some modification of Khrushchev's policies. But it is highly unlikely that the Soviets would or could yield sufficiently on enough m Jor issues to satisfy
  • . In Russia, Khrushchev treated me with respect, because I sat next to Stalin when he was at the lower end of the tableo Kosygin met me first when he was an assistant to Mikoyan at a time when I was negotiating with Stalin. I know Harold Wilson from his days
  • instructions to prepare for movement of government and to Chicago, when the crisis had escalated while the President was out of the White House for a brief period. How many days unfolded before Khrushchev blinked, I don't recall now. But really
  • : http://discoverlbj.org/exhibits/show/loh/oh 9 took place after the removal of Khrushchev--and incidentally this is a point worth noting about the fall of '64 . It's a strand in the story although it didn't have any great effect on us . M: Stronger
  • . January 20, 1g64 148 120 Remarks to Members of the National Congress of Amer­ ican Indians. January 20, 1¢4 149 121 Remarks to Members of the Budget Bureau Sta.ff at the Signing of the 1965 Budget. January 20, 1g64 122 Letter to Chairman Khrushchev
  • -- these nations are hypersensitive to the possibility of American hypocrisy toward Asia. Considering the Vienna talks with Khrushchev -- which, to the Asian mind, emphasize estern rather than Asian concerns -- and considering the negative line of various domestic
  • but but the month henceforth munist Khrushchev, of November. Within course because ) 7 served • In the thinking ~ad o'f-sijij'jif.P-riT.g=i~-::::pc·l"iey .1.. ways to winnow out was to the perhaps intense OL 1.':.>tlt:=~,4 ~-saw-a.n-w.-po