Discover Our Collections


19 results

Folder, "NUCLEAR - JCAE (Study of U.S. - NATO Nuclear Weapons Arrangement)," Files of Charles E. Johnson, NSF, Box 35 (Item)
Folder, "JCS -- War Games, Vol. 3, 1/65 ‑ 11/65 [1 of 2]," Agency Files, NSF, Box 31 (Item)
  • " wanted France out of the Alliance. really b. Both the"United States" and "France" wanted the US troop presence continued in West Germany. (The 'French" proposed a Four Power US-UK-FRG and French command over national forces in Germany). c. Neither
Folder, "NSAM # 345: Nuclear Planning, 4/22/1966," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 8 (Item)
  • an etfe
Folder, "NSAM # 345: Nuclear Planning, 4/22/1966," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 8 (Item)
  • these alternatives it i _s . important to get away from the false and troublesome dichotomy between alliance consultation and hardware control as alternative and competing routes to increased allied participation in nuclear affairs. 1. Alliance consultation should
Folder, "Multilateral Force - General," Files of Charles E. Johnson, NSF, Box 3 (Item)
  • the Alliance. with the reaction or and said that this was a very 1hL the PALSystem had now been installed ta.ry is satisfied seemed quite capability Mr. Holifield for weapons now seems much improved, and summarized by saying that the problems noted
Folder, "State Department, Policy Planning, Vol. 5," Agency Files, NSF, Box 52 (Item)
  • is changed General French participation to see NATOreplaced alliance. if the·alliance re-elected, some NATO at some after to pull in major respects 1969 out before then. In this be three One: situation there S€em, broadly speaking
Folder, "NATO - US Atomic Information to," Files of Charles E. Johnson, NSF, Box 5 (Item)
  • . Johnson to Keeny & Bundy Sl
Folder, "National Security Council - 1961 [2 of 3]," VP Papers, VP Security Files, Box 4 (Item)
  • 2. Suspicion pendable ally. will gro tI~a the United States is an tmde­ 3. This general notion will have specific adverse effect on our alliances such as NATO, CENTOand SEATO. Some of the members of these alliances have felt that their tri
Folder, "NSAM # 294: U.S. Nuclear and Strategic Delivery System Assistance to France, 4/20/1964," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 3 (Item)
  • supreme national interests were at stake, used only for the defense purposes of the Alliance. Given current French policy, it continues to be in this government's interest. not to con.t ribute to or assist in the development of a French nuclear warhead
Folder, "[Briefing Papers for National Security Council Meeting, June 19, 1968]," Meeting Notes Files, Box 3 (Item)
  • HOUSE (/ INFORMATION WASHINGTON SECRET June 18, 1968 MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT SUBJECT: NSC Meeting on NATO, Wednesday, June 19, noon The purpose of the NSC meeting on NATO is to discuss our policy on several Alliance issues which will come up
Folder, "[Briefing Papers for] September 4, 1968 National Security Council Mtg," Meeting Notes Files, Box 3 (Item)
  • on that occasion. I agree with you entirely on the importance of a strong North Atlantic Alliance. We have just witnessed an example of unprovoked aggression against a small nation very close to your country. The existence of NATO can provide the people
Folder, "July 24, 1968 - 1:30 p.m. Tuesday lunch with Foreign Policy Advisors," Papers of Tom Johnson, Box 3 (Item)
  • consultation with our NATO allies and in accordance 'with agreed Alliance procedures, have been achieved without undermining the •. ' II 1. I /~----~-----~U--____,,,__-~\L .. I I • -2­ cohesiveness e.nd strength of NATO and with the U.S. adhering
Memorandum # 294, U.S. Nuclear and Strategic Delivery System Assistance to France, 4/20/1964 (Item)
  • at stake, used only for the defense purposes of the Alliance. Given current French policy, it continues to be in this government's interest. not to contribute to or assist in the development of a French nuclear warhead capability or a French
Folder, "[NSC Meeting on] Current NATO Issues, 6/19/1968, Volume 5, Tab 70," National Security Council Meetings Files, NSF, Box 2 (Item)
  • . On the other hand, NATO recently had been debated in Norway and the Norwegians strongly voted for continued supp ort of the Alliance . Assistant Secretary Leddy By way of introduction, Leddy said that NATO is in a better state of health than the pessimists
Folder, "National Security Council (I)," VP Papers, VP Security Files, Box 4 (Item)
  • judgment of this plan not only \J\ terms of its immediate political attraction, but also in terms of its durable v~ue as an instrument for strengthening the alliance. I want your judgment on the preferred means of command and control -­ and in particular
Folder, "NATO - 144B," Files of Charles E. Johnson, NSF, Box 4 (Item)
  • . organization countries' Unclassified s. States role in alliance upon release under is needed delivery bilateral of NATO atomic NATO member under which we can exchange of information use of nuclear creation has hitherto itself of information
Folder, "Paris Talks-Sept. 30, 1961," VP Papers, VP Security Files, Box 2 (Item)
  • a lliance itself is "mo r e important than the buildup." He said that Khrushchev's major objective in Berlin had been t o smash the alliance but this had not been achieved. The European allies, he said, "now think the United States has leadership
Folder, "[NSC Meeting on] NATO, 12/13/1966, Volume 4, Tab 48," National Security Council Meetings Files, NSF, Box 2 (Item)
  • he dissolution of the alliance means the loss of our diplomatic cards in dealing with the Russians . We must t a l k t o Congress every chance we get about the continuing b ut changed NA TO structure. SE CRET/SENSITIV E ­ ser.vmESE' .r~ /Cl
Folder, "Defence Briefing for Paris Discussions (Originally Unfoldered)," VP Papers, VP Security Files, Box 2 (Item)
  • ,but there have been several adverse BAC·and SYGreactions to recent quadripartite steps. Steps now in process to bring the whole Alliance much more~ into Berlin contingency planning will, it is hoped, improve the atmosphere and elicit NATO-widesupport