Skip to main content
-
Subject >
Major force deployment
(remove)
-
Series >
Meeting Notes
(remove)
Limit your search
Tag
Contributor
Date
Subject
Type
Collection
Series
Specific Item Type
Time Period
5 results
- . Clifford and Rusk)
Staff work on support for Thieu 1 s proposition: to provide between
100, 000 and 125, 000 additional men in six months. How to nail it down?
Will there be conflicts between build-up of Vietnamese and U.S. forces?
(See Tab A)
4.
Pueblo
- of the
senior U.S. commanders. I also talked with Ambassador Bunker,
President Thieu and Vice President Ky. There were a number of
factors which surprised me. I certainly learned things I did not know
before:
The TET attack was very powerful and nationwideo
- to the
South Vietnamese and their determination~
I don't appreciate Thieu saying he needed more
A~erican
troops. I would
think he would be looking for more ways to get more of his own men.
But i f six battalions will help him exp~oit this opportunity, I am
- into
the Tet offensive, Thieu's state:rrent wasn't what more they
could do but that "it is time for more U.S. troops." There
is no easy answer to this.
If we continue with our present policy of adding more
troops and increasing our commitment, this policy may
-
tional 75,000 recruits. President Thieu has mentioned possible increases
ranging from 65,000 to 125,000. General Westmoreland estimates that a
total RVNAF strength of 751 ,739 can be reached by December 31 of this
year. This would mean 66,000 recruits