Discover Our Collections


  • Subject > India (remove)
  • Collection > National Security Files (remove)
  • Type > Text (remove)
  • Date > 1966-xx-xx (remove)

7 results

  • ., and was receiving far less per capita aid than most. The President said that he had to prove three things to the Congress; iirst., that others were fully participating in help for India; second, that :ndia was doing everything that she could do for herself
  • ..yub's finance minister·· ill be her,e ne:xt wee1'" for informal talks with the orld Bank and AID. Ayub is still pressing for resumption of military aid, and we l.,vill have recomn-, e:ndations ,on that in a :L..N Ne k.:,. But we are ignoring both
  • V.irs. Gan hie ane if t e 22 o wan ed he aide o me tion to get explore The S cretary ma da e. FORM • l S- again behind the PreBident the importance nteersn. 4 of this point "None. He par icularly an energe including In a free ary
  • with the International Bank for Reconstruction and Developmento From 1958 to 1961 he was again in Washington, that time as Indian Commissioner General for Economic Affairs, a post especially created to deal on a global basis with questions of foreign aid for India. 0 0
  • work· .._ out a ·Kashmir settlement the United States will not give aid to , . either country .. This in effect would give Pakistan a veto on U.S. •• ..: .• aid to India. In effect this would permit one party to sabotage the •..•·· Tashkent Agreement
  • by India's need for US aid. She, and especially some of her advisers, are well awe.re o:f of the importance of the US to Indian development, so that no basic modification the Indian non-alignment poli~y is likely. Indeed, non-alignment as a slogan
  • Bundy ... Policy Team • • • • • .• .. ...... . . . . .. White House LGen David A. Burchinal • • • • JCS Mr. William S. Gaud • • • AID LGen Andrew J. Goodpaster, USA. • General Harold K. Johnson, USA. • Hon. u