Skip to main content

Discover Our Collections

18 results

Folder, "NSAM # 316: Military Exercises, 11/12/1964," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 5 (Item)

to incorporate your de sired changes. I have . reduced the time span covered in the preliminary notification from two years to one year, and have asked that a new schedule be supplied each quarter, instead of merely requesting monthly corrections to the original

Folder, "Multilateral Force - General," Files of Charles E. Johnson, NSF, Box 3 (Item)

but that certainly has no objection was rather if the u.s. more milj,. time for U.S. weapons, the Joint Committee to the PAL System for U.S. weapons. mentioned also that the destruct had been weapons at the bases visited, and he assumed on other weapons 1n

Folder, "NSAM # 348: Alternatives to US Facilities in Pakistan, 5/30/1966," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 8 (Item)

continue to be valid, i.e., that it remains in the U.S. interest to develop alternatives to U.So facilities in Pakistan and that measures toward that end are feasible. 2o The passage of time, however, has necessitated certain changes in specific

Folder, "NSAM # 298: Study of Possible Redeployment of U.S. Division now Stationed in Korea, 5/5/1964," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 4 (Item)

. Division Now Stationed in Korea Attached pursuant to your request in NSAM No. 298 is a coordinated State-AID-Defense study or a possible redeployment of' one or the two U.S. divisions now stationed in Korea. Appended to the study is a time-phased plan f'or

Folder, "NSAM # 301: Intelligence Installations, Ref NSAM 300, 5/19/1964," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 4 (Item)

, and agrees that it is not feasible to have such plans to cover every case. At the same time, the report leaves unanswered a number of questions. There is enclosed herewith a copy of the principal comments of the representative of the Department of State

Folder, "NSAM # 302: Dispersal Plan for NORAD Air Defense Service, 5/22/1964," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 4 (Item)

&ft &Dct·a1fJOelated rmde&r woapoo.• to Canadian buea aa aA -a1enda item 111 lhe US.Cana~ MlAl•terf.al Jola& Comnnuee cm Defo.uo on Juae ZS. It la undot'etood that the aovor~t ot Canada ha• no objecUon to CIJ,u lderatlon ot We Uem at thla time. z

Folder, "NSAM # 318: Future of Nuclear Defense of Atlantic Alliance, 11/14/1964," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 6 (Item)

tbere m&f ~ time tor careful couWeratloa aa4 ..claloa belu• tn1 mnttag wldl Prim• Mlal•te• Wllaon oa JJecembff 1 aad I. /s/ Lt3J 'l'OP !EGRET December 8, 1964 U. S. Comments on the UK Proposal of a Project for an Atlantic Nuclear Force 1. Preamble

Folder, "NSAM # 300: Review of Alternative Communications, Navigation, Missile and Space Tracking and Data Acquisition Facilities, 5/19/1964," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 4 (Item)

at this time, but a tentative .recommendation is included in the attachment. In the Near East, the only NASA stat1on concerned is the SAO Baker• . Nunn camera at Naini-Tal, India. In the event it would have to be ·.moved, NASA would propose to move it to one

Folder, "NSAM # 294: U.S. Nuclear and Strategic Delivery System Assistance to France, 4/20/1964," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 3 (Item)

judgment on the following: a. The technical, economic, quality, and timing importance of the item to the national weapons program. b. The use actually intended for the item. c. The alternative sources outside the u.s. for the item or a comparable

Folder, "Defence Briefing for Paris Discussions (Originally Unfoldered)," VP Papers, VP Security Files, Box 2 (Item)

been placed under ca'tegoiT A. and one ot tvo DD'a scheduled in 2. Adnnce planned acquisition ot 2 DDa ihe crew necesS&l"J'to man the FY 1963. Neces8&1"7lead time third aubmar:lneis~. :lnvolTed will preclude upediting and deJ.a¥ scrapping ot 2 DE

Folder, "NSAM # 321: Review of Strategic Stockpile Objectives, 12/1/1964," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 6 (Item)

purposes will not be adopted at this time. · I 2. Limited war stockpile objectives will be based upon: a. estimated essential shortages during a two-year emergency period {as opposed to the present three-year planning period), and b. the assumption

Folder, "December 4, 1967 - 12:23 p.m. Joint Chiefs of Staff," Papers of Tom Johnson, Box 1 (Item)

] '""a::-.·-; ·:.~- ~ ;-: '.~ '.~:s. : 1 0 i"5 ,. .1:i.. 1 H - 4 - ~:: -.- ,:. r:. l·tz:-L'.~ed ~; _ , ·. ; l'Jt?HTED ~ ;·. ·. : ~ u1n·s 1· ,...:· :.: . .-"$~;L t \ \/ ·;:.i . ., >~ ; ~!1:;.r-, n Secretary McNamara asked for more time to study this problem. He said

Folder, "NSAM # 289: Indian Ocean Naval Deployment, 3/19/1964," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 3 (Item)

time for adequate prepara tions. Since, in the Embassy's view, the government was likely to keep the matter confidential this per mission was granted. A request by Embassy Nairobi to inform on a confidential basis senior British officers serving

Folder, "NSAM # 359: Assignment of Highest National Priority to GRAVEL, CBU 24/29, and DRAGONTOOTH, 1/26/1967," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 9 (Item)

that he may come over and pick Uf> Defense 1 s copy as he did the last time. Florence NATIONAL SECURITY. ACTION MEMORANDUM NO. Toi Th• Vice P•••ident The Seoretary of Stat• Tho Sec:t'etl\ry o! Defenae · The. Seca.·etby of Commerce Tbe Chldrm.an. Atomic

Folder, "NSAM # 311: Review of the Problem of Assurance Against Any Missile Crisis in Cuba, 7/10/1964," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 5 (Item)

?. Or can't they? What about response time? Cloud coverage? Another problem is satellite coverage of Cuba as it might affect satellite coverage in other areas (e.g. Soviet Union, China). Then there is the matter of cost. A satellite launching costs between $8

Folder, "NSAM # 287: Release Procedures for Nuclear Weapons Assigned [Sanitized], 3/14/1964," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 3 (Item)

bases to isolated dispersal and deployment airfields to insure their survivability and to place forces in areas where they can best meet the developing threat. The proposed release procedure would permit the timely response which is essential

Folder, "NSAM # 358: Assignment of Highest National Priority to the Mk 84, Mod 1 2000 lb Bomb and to Project PRACTICE NINE, 1/13/1967," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 9 (Item)

handled these requests for assigning a DX priority to two Department of Defense procurement programs. I believe the memorandum for the President is self-explanatory. Some time ago I used to handle some of these DX priority requests and on the basis of my

Folder, "NSAM # 283: U.S. Overseas Internal Defense Training Policy and Objectives, 2/13/1964," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 3 (Item)

House, this would be an inopportune time to effect any changes to a NASM. It would be better to defer revisions of NASM 283 until after new staff has taken over. In the interim, the SIG will issue necessary instructions. Revised wording to be developed